Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Stress and Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/smi.3523
Sinem Yapıcı, Tuğba Uzer
{"title":"Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective.","authors":"Sinem Yapıcı, Tuğba Uzer","doi":"10.1002/smi.3523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study tested predictions from Processing Mode Theory, Self-Distancing Theory, and the Construal Matching Hypothesis by manipulating processing mode (abstract vs. concrete), self-perspective (self-distanced vs. self-immersed), and the construal level of emotion (high-level vs. low-level) to examine their effects on negative emotional reactivity. A total of 247 emerging adults were randomly assigned to one of eight experimental conditions, where they recalled either low-level or high-level negative emotional experiences. Participants visualised these events from either a self-immersed or self-distanced perspective and then wrote essays focusing on either the abstract or concrete aspects of the events. Emotional reactivity was assessed both before and after these interventions to evaluate the effects of the manipulations. Results indicated that abstract processing significantly reduced negative emotional reactivity, regardless of self-perspective and construal level. No significant interaction effects were observed between self-perspective and processing mode, nor between processing mode and the construal level of emotion. These findings suggest that transitioning to a reflective abstract processing mode facilitates emotion regulation independently of psychological distance or the nature of the negative emotion. Implications for theories of self-reflection and directions for future research, including distinctions between adaptive and maladaptive reflection, are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":"41 1","pages":"e3523"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study tested predictions from Processing Mode Theory, Self-Distancing Theory, and the Construal Matching Hypothesis by manipulating processing mode (abstract vs. concrete), self-perspective (self-distanced vs. self-immersed), and the construal level of emotion (high-level vs. low-level) to examine their effects on negative emotional reactivity. A total of 247 emerging adults were randomly assigned to one of eight experimental conditions, where they recalled either low-level or high-level negative emotional experiences. Participants visualised these events from either a self-immersed or self-distanced perspective and then wrote essays focusing on either the abstract or concrete aspects of the events. Emotional reactivity was assessed both before and after these interventions to evaluate the effects of the manipulations. Results indicated that abstract processing significantly reduced negative emotional reactivity, regardless of self-perspective and construal level. No significant interaction effects were observed between self-perspective and processing mode, nor between processing mode and the construal level of emotion. These findings suggest that transitioning to a reflective abstract processing mode facilitates emotion regulation independently of psychological distance or the nature of the negative emotion. Implications for theories of self-reflection and directions for future research, including distinctions between adaptive and maladaptive reflection, are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反思性抽象处理减少独立于自我观点的负面情绪。
本研究通过操纵加工模式(抽象与具体)、自我视角(自我疏离与自我沉浸)和情绪解释水平(高水平与低水平)来检验加工模式理论、自我疏离理论和解释匹配假说的预测,以检验它们对消极情绪反应的影响。共有247名刚成年的人被随机分配到8个实验环境中,在这些环境中,他们要么回忆低水平的负面情绪经历,要么回忆高水平的负面情绪经历。参与者从自我沉浸或自我疏离的角度来想象这些事件,然后写文章,重点关注事件的抽象或具体方面。在这些干预之前和之后评估情绪反应,以评估操作的效果。结果表明,无论自我视角和解释水平如何,抽象加工都能显著降低消极情绪反应。自我视角与加工方式之间、加工方式与情绪解释水平之间均无显著交互作用。这些发现表明,向反思性抽象加工模式的转变促进了独立于心理距离或负面情绪性质的情绪调节。讨论了自我反思的理论意义和未来的研究方向,包括适应和不适应反思的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
期刊最新文献
Destructive Self-Leadership? Self-Leadership, Maladaptive Coping, and Stress in College Students. Global Research on Cyberchondria: Scientometric and Visual Analysis From 2003 to 2022. Psychological Distress, Resources, and Coping Strategies Among Evacuees and Non-Evacuees From an Armed Conflict Zone: A Network Analysis. Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective. The Impact of Physical Activity on the Disability-Related Stress of Individuals With Physical Disabilities: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1