Microbial community structure of an anaerobic side-stream coupled anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor (AOMBR-ASSR) for an in-situ sludge reduction process.
Xinqiang Ning, Jialun Hu, Jiao Yue, Tang Tang, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Microbial community structure of an anaerobic side-stream coupled anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor (AOMBR-ASSR) for an in-situ sludge reduction process.","authors":"Xinqiang Ning, Jialun Hu, Jiao Yue, Tang Tang, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00449-024-03019-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor (AO-MBR, CP) as a reference, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to reveal the characteristics of the microbial community structure in the anaerobic side-stream anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor sludge reduction process (AOMBR-ASSR, SRP). After the stable operation of two processes for 120 days, the average removal efficiencies of TN and TP in the effluent of SRP were increased by 5.6% and 29.8%, respectively. The observed sludge yields (Y<sub>obs</sub>) of the two processes were 0.14 and 0.17 gMLSS/(gCOD), respectively, and the sludge reduction rate of the SRP was 19.5%. Compared to the CP, the microbial richness and diversity index of SRP increased significantly. Chloroflexi, which is responsible for the degradation of organic substances under an anaerobic condition, seemed to be reduced in the SRP. Meanwhile, other phyla that involved in the nitrogen cycle, such as Nitrospirae and Planctomycetes, were found to be more abundant in the SRP than in the CP. A total of 21 identified classes were observed, and primarily hydrolyzed fermented bacteria (Sphingobacteriia, Betaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria) and slow-growing microorganisms (Bacilli) were accumulated in the SRP. At the genus level, the inserted anaerobic side-stream reactor favored the hydrolyzed bacteria (Saprospiraceae, Rhodobacter and Candidatus_Competibacter), fermented bacteria (Lactococcus and Trichococcus), and slow-growing microorganisms (Dechloromonas and Haliangium), which play a crucial role in the sludge reduction. Furthermore, the enrichment of bacterial species related to nitrogen (Nitrospir and Azospira) provided the potential for nitrogen removal, while the anaerobic environment of the side-stream reactor promoted the enrichment of phosphorus-accumulating organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9024,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1027-1037"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-024-03019-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor (AO-MBR, CP) as a reference, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to reveal the characteristics of the microbial community structure in the anaerobic side-stream anoxic-aerobic membrane bioreactor sludge reduction process (AOMBR-ASSR, SRP). After the stable operation of two processes for 120 days, the average removal efficiencies of TN and TP in the effluent of SRP were increased by 5.6% and 29.8%, respectively. The observed sludge yields (Yobs) of the two processes were 0.14 and 0.17 gMLSS/(gCOD), respectively, and the sludge reduction rate of the SRP was 19.5%. Compared to the CP, the microbial richness and diversity index of SRP increased significantly. Chloroflexi, which is responsible for the degradation of organic substances under an anaerobic condition, seemed to be reduced in the SRP. Meanwhile, other phyla that involved in the nitrogen cycle, such as Nitrospirae and Planctomycetes, were found to be more abundant in the SRP than in the CP. A total of 21 identified classes were observed, and primarily hydrolyzed fermented bacteria (Sphingobacteriia, Betaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Deltaproteobacteria) and slow-growing microorganisms (Bacilli) were accumulated in the SRP. At the genus level, the inserted anaerobic side-stream reactor favored the hydrolyzed bacteria (Saprospiraceae, Rhodobacter and Candidatus_Competibacter), fermented bacteria (Lactococcus and Trichococcus), and slow-growing microorganisms (Dechloromonas and Haliangium), which play a crucial role in the sludge reduction. Furthermore, the enrichment of bacterial species related to nitrogen (Nitrospir and Azospira) provided the potential for nitrogen removal, while the anaerobic environment of the side-stream reactor promoted the enrichment of phosphorus-accumulating organisms.
期刊介绍:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering provides an international peer-reviewed forum to facilitate the discussion between engineering and biological science to find efficient solutions in the development and improvement of bioprocesses. The aim of the journal is to focus more attention on the multidisciplinary approaches for integrative bioprocess design. Of special interest are the rational manipulation of biosystems through metabolic engineering techniques to provide new biocatalysts as well as the model based design of bioprocesses (up-stream processing, bioreactor operation and downstream processing) that will lead to new and sustainable production processes.
Contributions are targeted at new approaches for rational and evolutive design of cellular systems by taking into account the environment and constraints of technical production processes, integration of recombinant technology and process design, as well as new hybrid intersections such as bioinformatics and process systems engineering. Manuscripts concerning the design, simulation, experimental validation, control, and economic as well as ecological evaluation of novel processes using biosystems or parts thereof (e.g., enzymes, microorganisms, mammalian cells, plant cells, or tissue), their related products, or technical devices are also encouraged.
The Editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their impact on biotechnological production and their contribution to the advancement of bioprocess and biosystems engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocess engineering (e.g., routine application of established methodologies, and description of established equipment) are discouraged.