Enhancing the coverage of SemRep using a relation classification approach

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104658
Shufan Ming , Rui Zhang , Halil Kilicoglu
{"title":"Enhancing the coverage of SemRep using a relation classification approach","authors":"Shufan Ming ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Halil Kilicoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>Relation extraction is an essential task in the field of biomedical literature mining and offers significant benefits for various downstream applications, including database curation, drug repurposing, and literature-based discovery. The broad-coverage natural language processing (NLP) tool SemRep has established a solid baseline for extracting subject–predicate–object triples from biomedical text and has served as the backbone of the Semantic MEDLINE Database (SemMedDB), a PubMed-scale repository of semantic triples. While SemRep achieves reasonable precision (0.69), its recall is relatively low (0.42). In this study, we aimed to enhance SemRep using a relation classification approach, in order to eventually increase the size and the utility of SemMedDB.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>We combined and extended existing SemRep evaluation datasets to generate training data. We leveraged the pre-trained PubMedBERT model, enhancing it through additional contrastive pre-training and fine-tuning. We experimented with three entity representations: mentions, semantic types, and semantic groups. We evaluated the model performance on a portion of the SemRep Gold Standard dataset and compared it to SemRep performance. We also assessed the effect of the model on a larger set of 12K randomly selected PubMed abstracts.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Our results show that the best model yields a precision of 0.62, recall of 0.81, and F<sub>1</sub> score of 0.70. Assessment on 12K abstracts shows that the model could double the size of SemMedDB, when applied to entire PubMed. We also manually assessed the quality of 506 triples predicted by the model that SemRep had not previously identified, and found that 67% of these triples were correct.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>These findings underscore the promise of our model in achieving a more comprehensive coverage of relationships mentioned in biomedical literature, thereby showing its potential in enhancing various downstream applications of biomedical literature mining. Data and code related to this study are available at <span>https://github.com/Michelle-Mings/SemRep_RelationClassification</span><svg><path></path></svg>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104658"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424000765/pdfft?md5=77a4a794708142e6489b4749a7eb4bc1&pid=1-s2.0-S1532046424000765-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424000765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:

Relation extraction is an essential task in the field of biomedical literature mining and offers significant benefits for various downstream applications, including database curation, drug repurposing, and literature-based discovery. The broad-coverage natural language processing (NLP) tool SemRep has established a solid baseline for extracting subject–predicate–object triples from biomedical text and has served as the backbone of the Semantic MEDLINE Database (SemMedDB), a PubMed-scale repository of semantic triples. While SemRep achieves reasonable precision (0.69), its recall is relatively low (0.42). In this study, we aimed to enhance SemRep using a relation classification approach, in order to eventually increase the size and the utility of SemMedDB.

Methods:

We combined and extended existing SemRep evaluation datasets to generate training data. We leveraged the pre-trained PubMedBERT model, enhancing it through additional contrastive pre-training and fine-tuning. We experimented with three entity representations: mentions, semantic types, and semantic groups. We evaluated the model performance on a portion of the SemRep Gold Standard dataset and compared it to SemRep performance. We also assessed the effect of the model on a larger set of 12K randomly selected PubMed abstracts.

Results:

Our results show that the best model yields a precision of 0.62, recall of 0.81, and F1 score of 0.70. Assessment on 12K abstracts shows that the model could double the size of SemMedDB, when applied to entire PubMed. We also manually assessed the quality of 506 triples predicted by the model that SemRep had not previously identified, and found that 67% of these triples were correct.

Conclusion:

These findings underscore the promise of our model in achieving a more comprehensive coverage of relationships mentioned in biomedical literature, thereby showing its potential in enhancing various downstream applications of biomedical literature mining. Data and code related to this study are available at https://github.com/Michelle-Mings/SemRep_RelationClassification.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用关系分类方法增强 SemRep 的覆盖范围。
目的:关系提取是生物医学文献挖掘领域的一项基本任务,可为数据库整理、药物再利用和基于文献的发现等各种下游应用带来显著优势。覆盖范围广泛的自然语言处理(NLP)工具SemRep为从生物医学文本中提取主谓宾三元组奠定了坚实的基础,并已成为语义MEDLINE数据库(SemMedDB)--一个PubMed规模的语义三元组存储库--的支柱。虽然SemRep达到了合理的精确度(0.69),但其召回率相对较低(0.42)。在本研究中,我们旨在使用关系分类方法来增强 SemRep,以便最终扩大 SemMedDB 的规模并提高其实用性:方法:我们结合并扩展了现有的SemRep评估数据集,以生成训练数据。我们利用预训练的PubMedBERT模型,通过额外的对比预训练和微调来增强该模型。我们试验了三种实体表征:提及、语义类型和语义组。我们在部分 SemRep 黄金标准数据集上评估了模型的性能,并将其与 SemRep 的性能进行了比较。我们还评估了该模型在更大的 12K 随机选取的 PubMed 摘要集上的效果:我们的结果表明,最佳模型的精确度为 0.62,召回率为 0.81,F1 得分为 0.70。对1.2万份摘要的评估结果表明,如果将该模型应用于整个PubMed,它可以使SemMedDB的规模扩大一倍。我们还对模型预测的506个三元组的质量进行了人工评估,发现其中67%的三元组是正确的:这些发现凸显了我们的模型在更全面地覆盖生物医学文献中提到的关系方面的前景,从而显示了它在加强生物医学文献挖掘的各种下游应用方面的潜力。本研究的相关数据和代码可在 https://github.com/Michelle-Mings/SemRep_RelationClassification 上获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Enhanced heart failure mortality prediction through model-independent hybrid feature selection and explainable machine learning Precision Drug Repurposing (PDR): Patient-level modeling and prediction combining foundational knowledge graph with biobank data Enhancing clinical data warehousing with provenance data to support longitudinal analyses and large file management : The gitOmmix approach for genomic and image data. From GPT to DeepSeek: Significant gaps remain in realizing AI in healthcare. Improving entity recognition using ensembles of deep learning and fine-tuned large language models: A case study on adverse event extraction from VAERS and social media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1