Enhancing clinical data warehousing with provenance data to support longitudinal analyses and large file management: The gitOmmix approach for genomic and image data
{"title":"Enhancing clinical data warehousing with provenance data to support longitudinal analyses and large file management: The gitOmmix approach for genomic and image data","authors":"Maxime Wack , Adrien Coulet , Anita Burgun , Bastien Rance","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><div>If hospital Clinical Data Warehouses are to address today’s focus in personalized medicine, they need to be able to track patients longitudinally and manage the large data sets generated by whole genome sequencing, RNA analyses, and complex imaging studies. Current Clinical Data Warehouses address neither issue. This paper reports on methods to enrich current systems by providing provenance data allowing patient histories to be followed longitudinally and managing the linking and versioning of large data sets from whatever source. The methods are open source and applicable to any clinical data warehouse system, whether data schema it uses.</div></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><div>We introduce <span>gitOmmix</span>, an approach that overcomes these limitations, and illustrate its usefulness in the management of medical omics data. <span>gitOmmix</span> relies on <em>(i)</em> a file versioning system: git, <em>(ii)</em> an extension that handles large files: git-annex, <em>(iii)</em> a provenance knowledge graph: PROV-O, and <em>(iv)</em> an alignment between the git versioning information and the provenance knowledge graph.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Capabilities inherited from git and git-annex enable retracing the history of a clinical interpretation back to the patient sample, through supporting data and analyses. In addition, the provenance knowledge graph, aligned with the git versioning information, enables querying and browsing provenance relationships between these elements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div><span>gitOmmix</span> adds a provenance layer to CDWs, while scaling to large files and being agnostic of the CDW system. For these reasons, we think that it is a viable and generalizable solution for omics clinical studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 104788"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046425000176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background:
If hospital Clinical Data Warehouses are to address today’s focus in personalized medicine, they need to be able to track patients longitudinally and manage the large data sets generated by whole genome sequencing, RNA analyses, and complex imaging studies. Current Clinical Data Warehouses address neither issue. This paper reports on methods to enrich current systems by providing provenance data allowing patient histories to be followed longitudinally and managing the linking and versioning of large data sets from whatever source. The methods are open source and applicable to any clinical data warehouse system, whether data schema it uses.
Method:
We introduce gitOmmix, an approach that overcomes these limitations, and illustrate its usefulness in the management of medical omics data. gitOmmix relies on (i) a file versioning system: git, (ii) an extension that handles large files: git-annex, (iii) a provenance knowledge graph: PROV-O, and (iv) an alignment between the git versioning information and the provenance knowledge graph.
Results:
Capabilities inherited from git and git-annex enable retracing the history of a clinical interpretation back to the patient sample, through supporting data and analyses. In addition, the provenance knowledge graph, aligned with the git versioning information, enables querying and browsing provenance relationships between these elements.
Conclusion:
gitOmmix adds a provenance layer to CDWs, while scaling to large files and being agnostic of the CDW system. For these reasons, we think that it is a viable and generalizable solution for omics clinical studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.