Parental Attitudes toward Gifted Students and Gifted Education: Attitude Profiles and Predictors.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12050048
Jae Yup Jung, Jihyun Lee
{"title":"Parental Attitudes toward Gifted Students and Gifted Education: Attitude Profiles and Predictors.","authors":"Jae Yup Jung, Jihyun Lee","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12050048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, an investigation was conducted into the types of attitudes that parents may have of gifted students and gifted education, and the predictors of these attitudes. Using data collected from 331 parents of students enrolled in a Christian faith-based school system in one of the eight states/territories of Australia, multiple analyses, including exploratory factor analysis and latent profile analysis, were performed. The results revealed three subgroups of parents, each representing distinct attitude profiles (i.e., \"strong\", \"moderate\" and \"weak\" supporters of gifted students and gifted education). Furthermore, we found nine variables to be potential predictors of parent attitudes, including perceptions of the giftedness of one's child, and the anticipated socio-emotional and academic impacts of giftedness and gifted education. Some of the important contributions of the study to the research literature included the distinction made by parents between attitudes toward gifted education adaptations and attitudes toward special gifted education settings, and the comparatively large number of parents who are moderately (rather than strongly or weakly) supportive of gifted students and gifted education.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11122637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12050048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, an investigation was conducted into the types of attitudes that parents may have of gifted students and gifted education, and the predictors of these attitudes. Using data collected from 331 parents of students enrolled in a Christian faith-based school system in one of the eight states/territories of Australia, multiple analyses, including exploratory factor analysis and latent profile analysis, were performed. The results revealed three subgroups of parents, each representing distinct attitude profiles (i.e., "strong", "moderate" and "weak" supporters of gifted students and gifted education). Furthermore, we found nine variables to be potential predictors of parent attitudes, including perceptions of the giftedness of one's child, and the anticipated socio-emotional and academic impacts of giftedness and gifted education. Some of the important contributions of the study to the research literature included the distinction made by parents between attitudes toward gifted education adaptations and attitudes toward special gifted education settings, and the comparatively large number of parents who are moderately (rather than strongly or weakly) supportive of gifted students and gifted education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长对资优学生和资优教育的态度:态度概况与预测因素。
本研究调查了家长对资优学生和资优教育的态度类型,以及这些态度的预测因素。研究利用从澳大利亚八个州/领地之一的基督教信仰学校系统的 331 名学生家长收集到的数据,进行了多项分析,包括探索性因子分析和潜在特征分析。结果显示了三个家长分组,分别代表了不同的态度特征(即对资优学生和资优教育的 "强烈"、"温和 "和 "微弱 "支持者)。此外,我们发现有九个变量可预测家长的态度,包括对子女资优程度的看法,以及资优和资优教育对社会情绪和学业的预期影响。这项研究对研究文献的一些重要贡献包括:家长对资优教育调整的态度和对特殊资优教育环境的态度有所区别,以及有相当多的家长对资优学生和资优教育持中度支持(而非强烈或微弱支持)态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking: Complementary Metacognitive Processes or Strange Bedfellows? Using Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Evaluate the Two-Process Theory of Matrix Reasoning. Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence. The Relationship Between Learning Environment Perception, Achievement Goals, and the Undergraduate Deep Learning Approach: A Longitudinal Mediation Model. Indirect Effects of Executive Planning Functions and Affectivity on the Work Ethic of University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1