Indirect Effects of Executive Planning Functions and Affectivity on the Work Ethic of University Students.

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13020020
Jorge Vergara-Morales, Milenko Del Valle, Nancy Lepe
{"title":"Indirect Effects of Executive Planning Functions and Affectivity on the Work Ethic of University Students.","authors":"Jorge Vergara-Morales, Milenko Del Valle, Nancy Lepe","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence13020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Work ethic represents a key factor for professional performance, as it guides behaviors relevant to the transparency and quality of work practices. Although a wide field of study has been developed, less research has analyzed the indirect influence of affective and cognitive factors involved in work ethic. Therefore, this study aims to assess the indirect effects of executive planning functions and affectivity on the work ethic of Chilean university students. The purpose is to test the following hypotheses: (1) executive planning functions have an indirect effect on work ethic through moral reasoning; (2) affectivity has an indirect effect on work ethic through moral intuition. The participants were a total of 582 Chilean university students from a university in the north (38.5%), one in the center (35.9%), and one in the southern area (25.6%). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, structural equation models (SEMs), and SEM mediation analysis. The results show the direct effect of moral reasoning (β = 0.47, <i>p</i> < .01) and moral intuition (β = 0.85, <i>p</i> < .01) on work ethic. Furthermore, they support the indirect effect of executive planning functions (β = 0.06, <i>p</i> < .01) and affectivity (β = 0.46, <i>p</i> < .01) on work ethic. The model explains 98% of the variance of work ethic, highlighting the critical roles of moral reasoning and moral intuition as psychological mechanisms that intervene and drive the effect of cognitive and affective factors. Theoretical and practical implications for teaching-learning processes in higher education are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Work ethic represents a key factor for professional performance, as it guides behaviors relevant to the transparency and quality of work practices. Although a wide field of study has been developed, less research has analyzed the indirect influence of affective and cognitive factors involved in work ethic. Therefore, this study aims to assess the indirect effects of executive planning functions and affectivity on the work ethic of Chilean university students. The purpose is to test the following hypotheses: (1) executive planning functions have an indirect effect on work ethic through moral reasoning; (2) affectivity has an indirect effect on work ethic through moral intuition. The participants were a total of 582 Chilean university students from a university in the north (38.5%), one in the center (35.9%), and one in the southern area (25.6%). The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, structural equation models (SEMs), and SEM mediation analysis. The results show the direct effect of moral reasoning (β = 0.47, p < .01) and moral intuition (β = 0.85, p < .01) on work ethic. Furthermore, they support the indirect effect of executive planning functions (β = 0.06, p < .01) and affectivity (β = 0.46, p < .01) on work ethic. The model explains 98% of the variance of work ethic, highlighting the critical roles of moral reasoning and moral intuition as psychological mechanisms that intervene and drive the effect of cognitive and affective factors. Theoretical and practical implications for teaching-learning processes in higher education are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执行计划职能和情感对大学生职业道德的间接影响。
职业道德是专业表现的关键因素,因为它指导与工作实践的透明度和质量相关的行为。虽然这方面的研究已经发展得很广泛,但很少有研究分析情感和认知因素对职业道德的间接影响。因此,本研究旨在评估执行计划功能和情感对智利大学生职业道德的间接影响。目的是检验以下假设:(1)行政规划职能通过道德推理对职业伦理产生间接影响;(2)情感通过道德直觉对职业伦理产生间接影响。参与者为582名智利大学生,分别来自北部地区(38.5%)、中部地区(35.9%)和南部地区(25.6%)。采用描述性统计、结构方程模型(SEM)和SEM中介分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,道德推理(β = 0.47, p < 0.01)和道德直觉(β = 0.85, p < 0.01)对职业道德有直接影响。此外,他们还支持执行计划职能(β = 0.06, p < 0.01)和情感(β = 0.46, p < 0.01)对职业道德的间接影响。该模型解释了98%的职业道德差异,强调了道德推理和道德直觉作为干预和驱动认知和情感因素影响的心理机制的关键作用。讨论了高等教育教学过程的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teachers' Self-Efficacy in Dyscalculia: Development and Psychometric Validation of a New Scale. Predictors of Psychological Well-Being Among Pre-Service Teachers: Emotional Intelligence and Occupational Anxiety. The Moderating Role of Intelligence and Prior Knowledge for the Effectiveness of a Computer-Based Mathematics Intervention in Students with Low Mathematics Performance. Beyond IQ: Systemic Resources in STEM Achievement. Dark Emotions Are Not Always Bad: The Role of Emotions and Professional Training in Predicting Patterns of Engagement and Burnout Among Preschool Teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1