Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence13020021
Gina C Lemos, M Adelina Guisande, Leandro S Almeida
{"title":"Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence.","authors":"Gina C Lemos, M Adelina Guisande, Leandro S Almeida","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence13020021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The school curriculum is increasingly aligned with real-world contexts and transversal skills. Simultaneously, conceptions of intelligence now emphasize contextual, motivational, and emotional dimensions. These shifts raise questions about the relevance of classical intelligence tests in predicting academic achievement, particularly during adolescence, a time of major curricular and developmental changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent samples of students, sixth-ninth grades (<i>n</i> = 1708) and tenth-twelfth grades (<i>n</i> = 3007), were randomly selected from public schools across Portugal. Cognitive abilities were measured by \"Bateria de Aptidões Cognitivas\" (BAC-AB), with nine subtests combining three contents (spatial, verbal, numerical) and three cognitive processes (comprehension, reasoning, problem solving). School achievement considers students' grades in Portuguese and Mathematics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subtest scores were higher in advanced grades, particularly in early adolescence. The correlations between cognitive subtests and academic achievement suggested that alignment between test item content and curriculum subjects is more influential than cognitive processes. Subtest scores explained a larger proportion of variance in academic achievement in basic education than in secondary education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Curricular changes may reduce reliance on classical cognitive abilities for academic achievement, though correlations remain significant. More integrated cognitive skills are emphasized as the curriculum aims to prepare students for understanding complexity, adapting to societal changes, and applying knowledge to respond effectively to challenges in and outside of school.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13020021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The school curriculum is increasingly aligned with real-world contexts and transversal skills. Simultaneously, conceptions of intelligence now emphasize contextual, motivational, and emotional dimensions. These shifts raise questions about the relevance of classical intelligence tests in predicting academic achievement, particularly during adolescence, a time of major curricular and developmental changes.

Methods: Two independent samples of students, sixth-ninth grades (n = 1708) and tenth-twelfth grades (n = 3007), were randomly selected from public schools across Portugal. Cognitive abilities were measured by "Bateria de Aptidões Cognitivas" (BAC-AB), with nine subtests combining three contents (spatial, verbal, numerical) and three cognitive processes (comprehension, reasoning, problem solving). School achievement considers students' grades in Portuguese and Mathematics.

Results: Subtest scores were higher in advanced grades, particularly in early adolescence. The correlations between cognitive subtests and academic achievement suggested that alignment between test item content and curriculum subjects is more influential than cognitive processes. Subtest scores explained a larger proportion of variance in academic achievement in basic education than in secondary education.

Conclusions: Curricular changes may reduce reliance on classical cognitive abilities for academic achievement, though correlations remain significant. More integrated cognitive skills are emphasized as the curriculum aims to prepare students for understanding complexity, adapting to societal changes, and applying knowledge to respond effectively to challenges in and outside of school.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:学校课程越来越与现实世界的背景和横向技能相一致。与此同时,智力概念也开始强调情境、动机和情感维度。这些变化对传统智力测验在预测学业成绩方面的相关性提出了质疑,尤其是在课程和发展发生重大变化的青春期:方法:从葡萄牙各地的公立学校随机抽取了两个独立的学生样本,分别是六至九年级(1708 人)和十至十二年级(3007 人)。认知能力通过 "Bateria de Aptidões Cognitivas"(BAC-AB)进行测量,共有九个分测验,包括三个内容(空间、语言、数字)和三个认知过程(理解、推理、解决问题)。学校成绩考虑了学生的葡萄牙语和数学成绩:结果:高年级,尤其是青春期早期的学生的分测验成绩较高。认知分测验与学业成绩之间的相关性表明,测验项目内容与课程科目之间的一致性比认知过程更有影响力。在基础教育的学业成绩变异中,子测验分数所占的解释比例大于中等教育:课程改革可能会减少学业成绩对经典认知能力的依赖,尽管相关性仍然显著。由于课程旨在培养学生理解复杂性、适应社会变化以及运用知识有效应对校内外挑战的能力,因此强调了更多的综合认知技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking: Complementary Metacognitive Processes or Strange Bedfellows? Using Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Evaluate the Two-Process Theory of Matrix Reasoning. Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence. The Relationship Between Learning Environment Perception, Achievement Goals, and the Undergraduate Deep Learning Approach: A Longitudinal Mediation Model. Indirect Effects of Executive Planning Functions and Affectivity on the Work Ethic of University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1