People from ethnic minorities seeking help for long COVID: a qualitative study.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-28 Print Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2023.0631
Nina Smyth, Damien Ridge, Tom Kingstone, Dipesh P Gopal, Nisreen A Alwan, Alexa Wright, Ashish Chaudhry, Sophie Clark, Rebecca Band, Carolyn A Chew-Graham
{"title":"People from ethnic minorities seeking help for long COVID: a qualitative study.","authors":"Nina Smyth, Damien Ridge, Tom Kingstone, Dipesh P Gopal, Nisreen A Alwan, Alexa Wright, Ashish Chaudhry, Sophie Clark, Rebecca Band, Carolyn A Chew-Graham","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2023.0631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People from ethnic minority groups are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, less likely to access primary health care, and have reported dissatisfaction with health care. Although the prevalence of long COVID in ethnic minority groups is unclear, such populations are underrepresented in long-COVID specialist clinics and long-COVID lived-experience research, which informed the original long-COVID healthcare guidelines.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the lived experiences of long COVID in people from ethnic minority groups.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study of people living with long COVID in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with people who self-disclosed long COVID were conducted between June 2022 and June 2023 via telephone or video call. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted. People who were living with long COVID, or caring for someone with long COVID, advised on all stages of the research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interviews were conducted with 31 participants representing diverse socioeconomic demographics. Help-seeking barriers included little awareness of long COVID or available support, and not feeling worthy of receiving care. Negative healthcare encounters were reported in primary health care; however, these services were crucial for accessing secondary or specialist care. There were further access difficulties and dissatisfaction with specialist care. Experiences of stigma and discrimination contributed to delays in seeking care and unsatisfactory experiences, resulting in feelings of mistrust in health care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Empathy, validation of experiences, and fairness in recognition and support of healthcare needs are required to restore trust in health care and improve the experiences of people with long COVID.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e814-e822"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2023.0631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People from ethnic minority groups are disproportionately affected by COVID-19, less likely to access primary health care, and have reported dissatisfaction with health care. Although the prevalence of long COVID in ethnic minority groups is unclear, such populations are underrepresented in long-COVID specialist clinics and long-COVID lived-experience research, which informed the original long-COVID healthcare guidelines.

Aim: To understand the lived experiences of long COVID in people from ethnic minority groups.

Design and setting: Qualitative study of people living with long COVID in the UK.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with people who self-disclosed long COVID were conducted between June 2022 and June 2023 via telephone or video call. Thematic analysis of the data was conducted. People who were living with long COVID, or caring for someone with long COVID, advised on all stages of the research.

Results: Interviews were conducted with 31 participants representing diverse socioeconomic demographics. Help-seeking barriers included little awareness of long COVID or available support, and not feeling worthy of receiving care. Negative healthcare encounters were reported in primary health care; however, these services were crucial for accessing secondary or specialist care. There were further access difficulties and dissatisfaction with specialist care. Experiences of stigma and discrimination contributed to delays in seeking care and unsatisfactory experiences, resulting in feelings of mistrust in health care.

Conclusion: Empathy, validation of experiences, and fairness in recognition and support of healthcare needs are required to restore trust in health care and improve the experiences of people with long COVID.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少数民族寻求 Long Covid 帮助:一项定性研究。
背景:少数族裔群体受 COVID-19 影响的比例过高,较少获得初级医疗保健服务,并对医疗保健服务表示不满。虽然朗格威在少数族裔群体中的发病率尚不清楚,但这些群体在朗格威专科诊所和朗格威生活体验研究中的比例较低,而朗格威的生活体验研究为最初的朗格威医疗指南提供了依据:对英国朗格威患者进行定性研究:在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,通过电话或视频通话对自我披露患有长效Covid的患者进行了半结构化访谈。进行了专题分析。长效Covid患者或照顾长效Covid患者的人就研究的各个阶段提供了建议:对 31 名参与者进行了访谈,他们来自不同的社会经济领域。寻求帮助的障碍包括:对朗格威或可用支持知之甚少,以及觉得自己不值得接受治疗。据报告,在初级医疗保健中遇到了负面的医疗服务;然而,这些服务对于获得二级或专科医疗服务至关重要。在专科治疗方面也存在更多的困难和不满。污名化和歧视的经历导致了寻求医疗服务的延迟和不满意的经历,从而导致了对医疗服务的不信任:污名化和歧视的经历导致了负面的医疗体验和对医疗服务的不信任,为寻求帮助制造了障碍。要恢复人们对医疗保健的信任,就必须在承认和支持医疗保健需求方面给予同情、经验验证和公平对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1