Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0166
Adam Grice, Amy S Izon, Nada F Khan, Robbie Foy, Rebecca J Beeken, Suzanne H Richards
{"title":"Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations.","authors":"Adam Grice, Amy S Izon, Nada F Khan, Robbie Foy, Rebecca J Beeken, Suzanne H Richards","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical guidance recommends promoting physical activity during general practice consultations. The frequency and content of physical activity discussions in UK general practice are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the content of physical activity discussions during routine consultations between patients and GPs.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Secondary analysis was undertaken of video-recorded UK general practice consultations from the One in a Million study, which was conducted in the West of England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In total, 294 consultation transcripts were available; these were screened to identify consultations that included or omitted physical activity advice when recommended by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. The content, quality, and depth of advice provided by GPs were scored to ascertain how meaningful the advice was.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Physical activity was relevant to management according to clinical guidance in 175/294 (59.5%) consultations. In 64 (36.6%) of these consultations, physical activity was discussed as part of clinical management; the depth of discussion was judged as 'meaningful' in 22 (12.6%) consultations. Although physical activity advice tended to be given most often for musculoskeletal problems, depth of advice did not appear to be related to the presenting problem. When physical activity advice was relevant and omitted, consultations prioritised another overriding presenting problem, or clinical management focused on another intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical activity advice, following national guidance, was potentially relevant to more than half of GP consultations; GPs delivered advice of varying depth in a third of these consultations. Future work should explore ways of delivering physical activity advice effectively, efficiently, and equitably within the constraints of general practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidance recommends promoting physical activity during general practice consultations. The frequency and content of physical activity discussions in UK general practice are poorly understood.

Aim: To explore the content of physical activity discussions during routine consultations between patients and GPs.

Design and setting: Secondary analysis was undertaken of video-recorded UK general practice consultations from the One in a Million study, which was conducted in the West of England.

Method: In total, 294 consultation transcripts were available; these were screened to identify consultations that included or omitted physical activity advice when recommended by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. The content, quality, and depth of advice provided by GPs were scored to ascertain how meaningful the advice was.

Results: Physical activity was relevant to management according to clinical guidance in 175/294 (59.5%) consultations. In 64 (36.6%) of these consultations, physical activity was discussed as part of clinical management; the depth of discussion was judged as 'meaningful' in 22 (12.6%) consultations. Although physical activity advice tended to be given most often for musculoskeletal problems, depth of advice did not appear to be related to the presenting problem. When physical activity advice was relevant and omitted, consultations prioritised another overriding presenting problem, or clinical management focused on another intervention.

Conclusion: Physical activity advice, following national guidance, was potentially relevant to more than half of GP consultations; GPs delivered advice of varying depth in a third of these consultations. Future work should explore ways of delivering physical activity advice effectively, efficiently, and equitably within the constraints of general practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全科医学中有关体育活动的讨论:对视频录像咨询的分析。
背景 临床指南建议在全科诊疗过程中推广体育锻炼。人们对英国全科医生讨论体育锻炼的频率和内容知之甚少。目的 探讨患者与全科医生(GPs)在常规咨询中讨论体育锻炼的内容。设计和环境 对 "百万分之一 "研究中的英国全科医生咨询录像进行二次分析。方法 我们筛选了 294 份问诊记录,找出了国家健康与护理卓越研究所 (NICE) 指南推荐的包含或遗漏体育锻炼建议的问诊内容。我们对全科医生提供的建议的内容、质量和深度进行了编码。结果 在 175/294 次(59.5%)咨询中,根据临床指南,体育锻炼与管理相关。在其中的 64/175 次(36.6%)会诊中,体育锻炼作为临床管理的一部分进行了讨论,22 次(12.6%)讨论的深度被评为 "有意义"。虽然体育锻炼建议往往是针对肌肉骨骼问题提出的,但建议的深度似乎与出现的问题无关。当体育锻炼建议具有相关性且被省略时,咨询者会优先考虑另一个最主要的问题,或将临床管理重点放在另一种干预措施上。结论 根据国家指南提供的体育锻炼建议可能与一半以上的全科医生会诊相关;全科医生能够在三分之一的会诊中提供不同深度的建议。今后的工作应探索如何在全科医生的限制条件下有效、高效、公平地提供体育锻炼建议。关键词 体育锻炼;全科医生;录像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1