Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228
Keigo Ban, Sheila Greenfield, Michael Burrows, Nicola Gale, Ian Litchfield
{"title":"Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.","authors":"Keigo Ban, Sheila Greenfield, Michael Burrows, Nicola Gale, Ian Litchfield","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern general practice is characterised by increased demand and growing multidisciplinarity, including ring-fenced funding for additional non-clinical roles. For practice receptionists, however, training has remained unchanged for decades despite primary care being under greater pressure than ever, with receptionists becoming a growing focal point for abuse and unprecedented numbers leaving the role.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present the evidence of the range of tasks that receptionists continue to perform, describing their impact on primary care delivery and how the role might be better supported.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review of research conducted in the UK.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of evidence contained in the major medical databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, ASSIA, Cochrane Library, and Embase) from January 2000 to March 2024 was conducted, including hand searches of the bibliographies of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 29 studies were identified that grouped into three themes: service delivery, patient attitudes, and receptionist experience. The theme 'service delivery' confirms the continuing role of receptionists in providing administrative support alongside the clinical tasks of prioritising patients for consultations, facilitating repeat prescriptions, and communicating blood test results. The theme 'patient attitudes' describes how patients lacked trust in receptionists, who were viewed as unqualified and unnecessarily obstructive. Finally, in considering receptionist experience, the contrast between their confidence in performing administrative roles and the anxiety induced from the clinically related tasks was described, particularly the mounting pressure from patients to meet their preferences for clinician appointments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although confident performing administrative tasks, receptionists described uncertainty and anxiety when providing clinically oriented support or managing patients when their requests for appointments could not be met. More appropriate training or professionalisation might improve staff retainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modern general practice is characterised by increased demand and growing multidisciplinarity, including ring-fenced funding for additional non-clinical roles. For practice receptionists, however, training has remained unchanged for decades despite primary care being under greater pressure than ever, with receptionists becoming a growing focal point for abuse and unprecedented numbers leaving the role.

Aim: To present the evidence of the range of tasks that receptionists continue to perform, describing their impact on primary care delivery and how the role might be better supported.

Design and setting: Systematic review of research conducted in the UK.

Method: A systematic review of evidence contained in the major medical databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, ASSIA, Cochrane Library, and Embase) from January 2000 to March 2024 was conducted, including hand searches of the bibliographies of included studies.

Results: In total, 29 studies were identified that grouped into three themes: service delivery, patient attitudes, and receptionist experience. The theme 'service delivery' confirms the continuing role of receptionists in providing administrative support alongside the clinical tasks of prioritising patients for consultations, facilitating repeat prescriptions, and communicating blood test results. The theme 'patient attitudes' describes how patients lacked trust in receptionists, who were viewed as unqualified and unnecessarily obstructive. Finally, in considering receptionist experience, the contrast between their confidence in performing administrative roles and the anxiety induced from the clinically related tasks was described, particularly the mounting pressure from patients to meet their preferences for clinician appointments.

Conclusion: Although confident performing administrative tasks, receptionists described uncertainty and anxiety when providing clinically oriented support or managing patients when their requests for appointments could not be met. More appropriate training or professionalisation might improve staff retainment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索现代全科诊所接待员的角色和影响:叙事综合系统综述。
背景:现代全科医疗的特点是需求增加、多学科性日益增强,包括为额外的非临床角色提供专项资金。然而,对于诊所接待员的培训几十年来一直未变,但基层医疗却面临着比以往更大的压力,接待员日益成为滥用职权的焦点,离开这一岗位的人数也空前增多:我们对主要医学数据库(Medline/PubMed、CINAHL、ASSIA、Cochrane Library 和 EMBASE)中截至 2023 年 7 月的证据进行了系统性回顾,包括对纳入研究的书目进行人工检索:我们确定了 28 项研究,并将其分为三个主题:服务提供:确认了前台接待员在提供行政支持的同时,还承担着优先安排患者就诊、为重复开处方提供便利、传达血液检测结果等临床任务的持续作用;患者态度:描述了患者如何对被视为不合格和不必要阻碍的前台接待员缺乏信任;最后,在考虑前台接待员的经验时,描述了他们在执行行政任务时的自信与临床相关任务所引发的焦虑之间的对比,尤其是患者为满足其对临床医生预约的偏好而不断增加的压力:结论:尽管前台接待人员在执行行政任务时信心十足,但在提供临床支持或管理病人时,他们还是会因无法满足病人的预约要求而感到不确定和焦虑。更适当的培训或专业化可能会提高员工的留任率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. Paramedic or GP consultations in primary care: prospective study comparing costs and outcomes. Exploring rural Scottish GPs' migration decisions: a secondary qualitative analysis considering burnout.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1