Arkajyoti Dutta , Zoltan Szekely , Hakan Guven , Xiao-Ping Li , John E. McLaughlin , Nilgun E. Tumer
{"title":"A fluorescence anisotropy-based competition assay to identify inhibitors against ricin and Shiga toxin ribosome interactions","authors":"Arkajyoti Dutta , Zoltan Szekely , Hakan Guven , Xiao-Ping Li , John E. McLaughlin , Nilgun E. Tumer","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2024.115580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ricin is one of the most toxic substances known and a type B biothreat agent. Shiga toxins (Stxs) produced by <em>E. coli</em> (STEC) and <em>Shigella dysenteriae</em> are foodborne pathogens. There is no effective therapy against ricin or STEC and there is an urgent need for inhibitors. Ricin toxin A subunit (RTA) and A1 subunit of Stx2a (Stx2A1) bind to the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the ribosomal P-stalk proteins to depurinate the sarcin/ricin loop. Modulation of toxin-ribosome interactions has not been explored as a strategy for inhibition. Therefore, development of assays that detect inhibitors targeting toxin-ribosome interactions remains a critical need. Here we describe a fluorescence anisotropy (FA)-based competitive binding assay using a BODIPY-TMR labeled 11-mer peptide (P11) derived from the P-stalk CTD to measure the binding affinity of peptides ranging from 3 to 11 amino acids for the P-stalk pocket of RTA and Stx2A1. Comparison of the affinity with the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay indicated that although the rank order was the same by both methods, the FA assay could differentiate better between peptides that show nonspecific interactions by SPR. The FA assay detects only interactions that compete with the labeled P11 and can validate inhibitor specificity and mechanism of action.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"692 ","pages":"Article 115580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269724001246/pdfft?md5=a6c263d17695c84cc0f06483b236bcd5&pid=1-s2.0-S0003269724001246-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269724001246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ricin is one of the most toxic substances known and a type B biothreat agent. Shiga toxins (Stxs) produced by E. coli (STEC) and Shigella dysenteriae are foodborne pathogens. There is no effective therapy against ricin or STEC and there is an urgent need for inhibitors. Ricin toxin A subunit (RTA) and A1 subunit of Stx2a (Stx2A1) bind to the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the ribosomal P-stalk proteins to depurinate the sarcin/ricin loop. Modulation of toxin-ribosome interactions has not been explored as a strategy for inhibition. Therefore, development of assays that detect inhibitors targeting toxin-ribosome interactions remains a critical need. Here we describe a fluorescence anisotropy (FA)-based competitive binding assay using a BODIPY-TMR labeled 11-mer peptide (P11) derived from the P-stalk CTD to measure the binding affinity of peptides ranging from 3 to 11 amino acids for the P-stalk pocket of RTA and Stx2A1. Comparison of the affinity with the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) assay indicated that although the rank order was the same by both methods, the FA assay could differentiate better between peptides that show nonspecific interactions by SPR. The FA assay detects only interactions that compete with the labeled P11 and can validate inhibitor specificity and mechanism of action.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.