Artificial Intelligence in Drug Identification and Validation: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Drug Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1055/a-2306-8311
Mukhtar Lawal Abubakar, Neha Kapoor, Asha Sharma, Lokesh Gambhir, Nakuleshwar Dutt Jasuja, Gaurav Sharma
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Drug Identification and Validation: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Mukhtar Lawal Abubakar, Neha Kapoor, Asha Sharma, Lokesh Gambhir, Nakuleshwar Dutt Jasuja, Gaurav Sharma","doi":"10.1055/a-2306-8311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The end-to-end process in the discovery of drugs involves therapeutic candidate identification, validation of identified targets, identification of hit compound series, lead identification and optimization, characterization, and formulation and development. The process is lengthy, expensive, tedious, and inefficient, with a large attrition rate for novel drug discovery. Today, the pharmaceutical industry is focused on improving the drug discovery process. Finding and selecting acceptable drug candidates effectively can significantly impact the price and profitability of new medications. Aside from the cost, there is a need to reduce the end-to-end process time, limiting the number of experiments at various stages. To achieve this, artificial intelligence (AI) has been utilized at various stages of drug discovery. The present study aims to identify the recent work that has developed AI-based models at various stages of drug discovery, identify the stages that need more concern, present the taxonomy of AI methods in drug discovery, and provide research opportunities. From January 2016 to September 1, 2023, the study identified all publications that were cited in the electronic databases including Scopus, NCBI PubMed, MEDLINE, Anthropology Plus, Embase, APA PsycInfo, SOCIndex, and CINAHL. Utilising a standardized form, data were extracted, and presented possible research prospects based on the analysis of the extracted data.</p>","PeriodicalId":11451,"journal":{"name":"Drug Research","volume":"74 5","pages":"208-219"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2306-8311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The end-to-end process in the discovery of drugs involves therapeutic candidate identification, validation of identified targets, identification of hit compound series, lead identification and optimization, characterization, and formulation and development. The process is lengthy, expensive, tedious, and inefficient, with a large attrition rate for novel drug discovery. Today, the pharmaceutical industry is focused on improving the drug discovery process. Finding and selecting acceptable drug candidates effectively can significantly impact the price and profitability of new medications. Aside from the cost, there is a need to reduce the end-to-end process time, limiting the number of experiments at various stages. To achieve this, artificial intelligence (AI) has been utilized at various stages of drug discovery. The present study aims to identify the recent work that has developed AI-based models at various stages of drug discovery, identify the stages that need more concern, present the taxonomy of AI methods in drug discovery, and provide research opportunities. From January 2016 to September 1, 2023, the study identified all publications that were cited in the electronic databases including Scopus, NCBI PubMed, MEDLINE, Anthropology Plus, Embase, APA PsycInfo, SOCIndex, and CINAHL. Utilising a standardized form, data were extracted, and presented possible research prospects based on the analysis of the extracted data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在药物鉴定和验证中的应用:范围综述。
药物发现的端到端过程包括候选治疗药物的确定、已确定靶点的验证、热门化合物系列的确定、先导化合物的确定和优化、表征以及制剂和开发。这一过程漫长、昂贵、繁琐且效率低下,新药发现的损耗率很大。如今,制药业正致力于改进药物发现过程。有效地寻找和选择可接受的候选药物会极大地影响新药的价格和利润。除成本外,还需要缩短端到端流程时间,限制各阶段的实验数量。为此,人工智能(AI)已被应用于药物发现的各个阶段。本研究旨在确定近期在药物发现各阶段开发基于人工智能模型的工作,找出需要更多关注的阶段,介绍药物发现中人工智能方法的分类,并提供研究机会。从2016年1月到2023年9月1日,该研究确定了所有在电子数据库中被引用的出版物,包括Scopus、NCBI PubMed、MEDLINE、Anthropology Plus、Embase、APA PsycInfo、SOCIndex和CINAHL。利用标准化表格提取数据,并根据对提取数据的分析提出可能的研究前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Research
Drug Research PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Drug Research (formerly Arzneimittelforschung) is an international peer-reviewed journal with expedited processing times presenting the very latest research results related to novel and established drug molecules and the evaluation of new drug development. A key focus of the publication is translational medicine and the application of biological discoveries in the development of drugs for use in the clinical environment. Articles and experimental data from across the field of drug research address not only the issue of drug discovery, but also the mathematical and statistical methods for evaluating results from industrial investigations and clinical trials. Publishing twelve times a year, Drug Research includes original research articles as well as reviews, commentaries and short communications in the following areas: analytics applied to clinical trials chemistry and biochemistry clinical and experimental pharmacology drug interactions efficacy testing pharmacodynamics pharmacokinetics teratology toxicology.
期刊最新文献
In Silico Identification of Promising PDE5 Inhibitors Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Natural Derivatives: A Study Involving Docking and ADMET Analysis. Amputation Risk in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients Treated with SGLT-2 Inhibitors: A Systematic Literature Review of Randomized Clinical Trials. Bioflavonoid Daidzein: Therapeutic Insights, Formulation Advances, and Future Directions. Unraveling the Interplay of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 and N-methyl-d-aspartate Receptors in Seizure Susceptibility. A Comparative Analysis of ADRs under Obeticholic Acid and Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Cholestatic Liver Diseases Using the FAERS Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1