Applications of Machine Learning in Prognostication of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551
Patrick F Yao, Pranjan A Gandhi, Eric P McMullen, Marlin Manka, Jason Liang
{"title":"Applications of Machine Learning in Prognostication of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Patrick F Yao, Pranjan A Gandhi, Eric P McMullen, Marlin Manka, Jason Liang","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to review the literature regarding the current state and clinical applicability of machine learning models in prognosticating the outcomes of patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the early clinical presentation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Databases were searched for studies including machine learning and mild traumatic brain injury from inception to March 10, 2023. Included studies had a primary outcome of predicting post-mild traumatic brain injury prognosis or sequelae. The Prediction model study Risk of Bias for Predictive Models assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias and applicability of included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1235 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, including data from 127,929 patients. The most frequently used modeling techniques were support vector machine and artificial neural network and area under the curve ranged from 0.66 to 0.889. Despite promise, several limitations to studies exist such as low sample sizes, database restrictions, inconsistencies in patient presentation definitions, and lack of comparison to traditional clinical judgment or tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning models show potential in early stage mild traumatic brain injury prognostication, but to achieve widespread adoption, future clinical studies prognosticating mild traumatic brain injury using machine learning need to reduce bias, provide clarity and consistency in defining patient populations targeted and validate against established benchmarks.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to review the literature regarding the current state and clinical applicability of machine learning models in prognosticating the outcomes of patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the early clinical presentation.

Design: Databases were searched for studies including machine learning and mild traumatic brain injury from inception to March 10, 2023. Included studies had a primary outcome of predicting post-mild traumatic brain injury prognosis or sequelae. The Prediction model study Risk of Bias for Predictive Models assessment tool was used for assessing the risk of bias and applicability of included studies.

Results: Out of 1235 articles, 10 met the inclusion criteria, including data from 127,929 patients. The most frequently used modeling techniques were support vector machine and artificial neural network and area under the curve ranged from 0.66 to 0.889. Despite promise, several limitations to studies exist such as low sample sizes, database restrictions, inconsistencies in patient presentation definitions, and lack of comparison to traditional clinical judgment or tools.

Conclusions: Machine learning models show potential in early stage mild traumatic brain injury prognostication, but to achieve widespread adoption, future clinical studies prognosticating mild traumatic brain injury using machine learning need to reduce bias, provide clarity and consistency in defining patient populations targeted and validate against established benchmarks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习在 mTBI 诊断中的应用:系统回顾
目的回顾有关机器学习(ML)模型在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者早期临床表现预后方面的现状和临床适用性的文献:设计:在数据库中搜索了从开始到 2023 年 3 月 10 日期间有关 ML 和 mTBI 的研究。纳入研究的主要结果是预测 mTBI 后的预后或后遗症。预测模型研究偏倚风险评估工具(PROBAST)用于评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和适用性:在 1235 篇文章中,有 10 篇符合纳入标准,包括 127929 名患者的数据。最常用的建模技术是支持向量机(SVM)和人工神经网络(NN),曲线下面积(AUC)在 0.66-0.889 之间。尽管前景看好,但研究仍存在一些局限性,如样本量少、数据库限制、患者表现定义不一致以及缺乏与传统临床判断或工具的比较等:ML模型在早期mTBI预后中显示出了潜力,但要实现广泛应用,未来使用ML对mTBI进行预后的临床研究需要减少偏倚,在定义目标患者人群时提供清晰度和一致性,并根据既定基准进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Surface acoustic wave attenuation in polycrystals: Numerical modeling using a statistical digital twin of an actual sample
IF 4.2 2区 物理与天体物理UltrasonicsPub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106585
Tomáš Grabec , István A. Veres , Martin Ryzy
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over the Supplementary Motor Area on Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis. Comparing Prefabricated and 3D-Printed Foot Orthoses for the Management of Flat Foot Condition: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Comparison of Combined Virtual Reality Combined With Standing Balance Training Versus Standard Practice in Patients With Hemiplegia: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Axillary Nerve Improves Chronic Shoulder Pain and Dysfunction After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Case Report. Comparative Study Between Aquatic Therapy and Land-Based Exercises in Hemiplegic Patients After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1