In Vivo Challenge Trials with Dietary Antiparasitics Reveal New Insights into the Practical Use of Fenbendazole against Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea) Infection in Sparus aurata (Teleostei)

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES Aquaculture Research Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1155/2024/5515748
Paolo Merella, Francisco Esteban Montero, Luca Parma, Lorenzo Morsiani, Roberto Cerri, Andrea Di Biase, Marta Polinas, Claudio Murgia, Elisabetta Antuofermo, Giovanni Garippa
{"title":"In Vivo Challenge Trials with Dietary Antiparasitics Reveal New Insights into the Practical Use of Fenbendazole against Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea) Infection in Sparus aurata (Teleostei)","authors":"Paolo Merella,&nbsp;Francisco Esteban Montero,&nbsp;Luca Parma,&nbsp;Lorenzo Morsiani,&nbsp;Roberto Cerri,&nbsp;Andrea Di Biase,&nbsp;Marta Polinas,&nbsp;Claudio Murgia,&nbsp;Elisabetta Antuofermo,&nbsp;Giovanni Garippa","doi":"10.1155/2024/5515748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The microcotylid <i>Sparicotyle chrysophrii</i> is one of the most harmful parasites for the aquaculture of the gilthead seabream <i>Sparus aurata</i>, for which effective treatments are needed. The efficacy of dietary praziquantel (PZQ, 30–50 mg kg body weight<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>), emamectin benzoate (EMB, 0.015–0.050 mg kg BW<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>), and fenbendazole (FBZ, 40–75 mg kg BW<sup>−1</sup> day<sup>−1</sup>) against <i>S. chrysophrii</i> on gilthead seabream was tested in four different <i>in vivo</i> challenge trials. Specimens of gilthead seabream naturally infected with <i>S. chrysophrii</i> were maintained in three separate recirculating aquaculture systems of 142 L (1 control vs. 2 treated). Fish were fed (ration 1.2% BW day<sup>−1</sup>) 5 days a week for 4 weeks, alternating weeks with medicated and control feed. On days 0, 14, and 28, samples of 7–9 fish per group were collected and the gills were examined for <i>S. chrysophrii</i>. The gills of hosts treated with EMB and FBZ were evaluated by histopathology. The trials showed that in-feed PZQ has low palatability, causing rejection which did not allow its efficacy to be adequately investigated. While dietary EMB was associated with adverse effects, such as gill de-epithelialisation and necrosis, with no demonstrated efficacy against <i>S. chrysophrii</i>. On the other hand, all the fish treated with FBZ lost all parasites, showing 100% efficacy and also suggesting a preventive/repellent action against the monogenean. In conclusion, the present study provides indications for the use of dietary FBZ as a medical device for the treatment/prophylaxis of sparicotylosis in aquaculture.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8104,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5515748","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquaculture Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5515748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The microcotylid Sparicotyle chrysophrii is one of the most harmful parasites for the aquaculture of the gilthead seabream Sparus aurata, for which effective treatments are needed. The efficacy of dietary praziquantel (PZQ, 30–50 mg kg body weight−1 day−1), emamectin benzoate (EMB, 0.015–0.050 mg kg BW−1 day−1), and fenbendazole (FBZ, 40–75 mg kg BW−1 day−1) against S. chrysophrii on gilthead seabream was tested in four different in vivo challenge trials. Specimens of gilthead seabream naturally infected with S. chrysophrii were maintained in three separate recirculating aquaculture systems of 142 L (1 control vs. 2 treated). Fish were fed (ration 1.2% BW day−1) 5 days a week for 4 weeks, alternating weeks with medicated and control feed. On days 0, 14, and 28, samples of 7–9 fish per group were collected and the gills were examined for S. chrysophrii. The gills of hosts treated with EMB and FBZ were evaluated by histopathology. The trials showed that in-feed PZQ has low palatability, causing rejection which did not allow its efficacy to be adequately investigated. While dietary EMB was associated with adverse effects, such as gill de-epithelialisation and necrosis, with no demonstrated efficacy against S. chrysophrii. On the other hand, all the fish treated with FBZ lost all parasites, showing 100% efficacy and also suggesting a preventive/repellent action against the monogenean. In conclusion, the present study provides indications for the use of dietary FBZ as a medical device for the treatment/prophylaxis of sparicotylosis in aquaculture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用膳食抗寄生虫药的体内挑战试验揭示了芬苯达唑在实际应用中对抗鮨科鱼类 Sparicotyle chrysophrii (Monogenea) 感染的新见解
金头鲷(Sparicotyle chrysophrii)是对水产养殖最有害的寄生虫之一,需要有效的治疗方法。在四项不同的体内挑战试验中,测试了吡喹酮(PZQ,30-50 毫克/千克体重-1 天-1)、苯甲酸戊酯(EMB,0.015-0.050 毫克/千克体重-1 天-1)和芬苯达唑(FBZ,40-75 毫克/千克体重-1 天-1)对金头鲷上的金头鲷寄生虫的疗效。将自然感染金头鲷的标本分别饲养在三个 142 升的循环水养殖系统中(1 个对照组与 2 个处理组)。连续 4 周每周 5 天喂鱼(日粮为 1.2% 体重-1),药物饲料和对照饲料交替喂食。第 0 天、第 14 天和第 28 天,每组收集 7-9 条鱼的样本,并检查鱼鳃是否有干酪痢疾杆菌。用 EMB 和 FBZ 处理的宿主的鳃通过组织病理学进行评估。试验表明,饲料中的 PZQ 适口性低,会引起排斥反应,因此无法充分研究其功效。而投喂 EMB 会产生不良影响,如鳃脱皮和坏死,但对金眼鲷没有明显的疗效。另一方面,所有用 FBZ 处理过的鱼都失去了所有寄生虫,显示出 100% 的有效性,同时也表明对单细胞虫有预防/驱避作用。总之,本研究为在水产养殖中使用饲料添加剂 FBZ 作为治疗/预防麻风病的医疗器械提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquaculture Research
Aquaculture Research 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
464
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: International in perspective, Aquaculture Research is published 12 times a year and specifically addresses research and reference needs of all working and studying within the many varied areas of aquaculture. The Journal regularly publishes papers on applied or scientific research relevant to freshwater, brackish, and marine aquaculture. It covers all aquatic organisms, floristic and faunistic, related directly or indirectly to human consumption. The journal also includes review articles, short communications and technical papers. Young scientists are particularly encouraged to submit short communications based on their own research.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Different Feeding Habits on Metabolomics Profiles and Microbiota Composition and Functions of Tilapia Gut Effect of Dietary Protein and Lipid Ratios on Zootechnical Performance and Body Composition of African Native Freshwater Prawn Macrobrachium macrobrachion (Herklots, 1851) Juveniles Organic Aquaculture Regulation, Production, and Marketing: Current Status, Issues, and Future Prospects—A Systematic Review Morphological Characteristics, Genetic Diversity, and Microsatellite Analysis of the Progenies (F1, F2, and Backcross Descendant) of Siniperca chuatsi and Siniperca scherzeri Dietary Nanozeolite Powder to Reduce Water Total Ammonia Nitrogen (TAN) and Improve Growth Performance and Plasma Biochemical Indices of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1