Biocompatibility of 3D printed plastics for use in bioreactors

Q1 Computer Science Bioprinting Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00347
Joseph P. Licata, Helena Slupianek, Shahrizoda Rizokulova, Jonathan A. Gerstenhaber, Peter I. Lelkes
{"title":"Biocompatibility of 3D printed plastics for use in bioreactors","authors":"Joseph P. Licata,&nbsp;Helena Slupianek,&nbsp;Shahrizoda Rizokulova,&nbsp;Jonathan A. Gerstenhaber,&nbsp;Peter I. Lelkes","doi":"10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Three-dimensional (3D) printing has the potential to be used for rapid-prototyping and inexpensive fabrication of bioreactors for advanced cell and tissue culture. However, the suitability of materials used for 3D printing these bioreactors that will be in direct contact with cells and culture media remains to be established. Many of the most common low-cost materials have not been thoroughly tested under stringent cell culture conditions, especially not with highly sensitive human cell types, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). This study aims to characterize some 3D printed plastics, such as thermoplastics and photopolymers, focusing on the toxicity/cytocompatibility of the materials as assessed by hiPSC viability, retention of pluripotency, and cardiogenic differentiation potential. Experiments were conducted in a manner that simulates contact between 3D printed plastics and cell culture media, as found in a 3D printed bioreactor. Both photopolymers tested here reduced the viability of hiPSCs, but not of primary human fibroblasts, highlighting the importance of carrying out these tests with the cells of interest. The thermoplastics did not adversely affect stem cell viability, pluripotency, or cardiac differentiation potential. However, except for Nylon12, all thermoplastics deformed during autoclaving, leading us to choose Nylon12 as the most suitable material for bioreactor fabrication. This study represents a step forward in the use of 3D printing for the rapid, low-cost fabrication of custom-designed bioreactors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37770,"journal":{"name":"Bioprinting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405886624000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has the potential to be used for rapid-prototyping and inexpensive fabrication of bioreactors for advanced cell and tissue culture. However, the suitability of materials used for 3D printing these bioreactors that will be in direct contact with cells and culture media remains to be established. Many of the most common low-cost materials have not been thoroughly tested under stringent cell culture conditions, especially not with highly sensitive human cell types, such as induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). This study aims to characterize some 3D printed plastics, such as thermoplastics and photopolymers, focusing on the toxicity/cytocompatibility of the materials as assessed by hiPSC viability, retention of pluripotency, and cardiogenic differentiation potential. Experiments were conducted in a manner that simulates contact between 3D printed plastics and cell culture media, as found in a 3D printed bioreactor. Both photopolymers tested here reduced the viability of hiPSCs, but not of primary human fibroblasts, highlighting the importance of carrying out these tests with the cells of interest. The thermoplastics did not adversely affect stem cell viability, pluripotency, or cardiac differentiation potential. However, except for Nylon12, all thermoplastics deformed during autoclaving, leading us to choose Nylon12 as the most suitable material for bioreactor fabrication. This study represents a step forward in the use of 3D printing for the rapid, low-cost fabrication of custom-designed bioreactors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于生物反应器的 3D 打印塑料的生物相容性
三维(3D)打印技术可用于快速成型和廉价制造用于先进细胞和组织培养的生物反应器。然而,用于三维打印这些与细胞和培养基直接接触的生物反应器的材料的适用性仍有待确定。许多最常见的低成本材料还没有在严格的细胞培养条件下进行过全面测试,特别是没有与诱导多能干细胞(hiPSC)等高敏感人类细胞类型进行过测试。本研究旨在描述一些3D打印塑料(如热塑性塑料和光聚合物)的特性,重点是通过hiPSC的存活率、多能性保持率和心源性分化潜能来评估材料的毒性/细胞相容性。实验以模拟 3D 打印生物反应器中 3D 打印塑料与细胞培养基接触的方式进行。这里测试的两种光聚合物都降低了hiPSCs的存活率,但没有降低原代人类成纤维细胞的存活率,这凸显了用相关细胞进行这些测试的重要性。热塑性塑料不会对干细胞的活力、多能性或心脏分化潜能产生不利影响。不过,除尼龙12外,所有热塑性塑料在高压灭菌时都会变形,因此我们选择尼龙12作为最适合生物反应器制造的材料。这项研究表明,利用三维打印技术快速、低成本地制造定制设计的生物反应器向前迈进了一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioprinting
Bioprinting Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Bioprinting is a broad-spectrum, multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of 3D fabrication technology involving biological tissues, organs and cells for medical and biotechnology applications. Topics covered include nanomaterials, biomaterials, scaffolds, 3D printing technology, imaging and CAD/CAM software and hardware, post-printing bioreactor maturation, cell and biological factor patterning, biofabrication, tissue engineering and other applications of 3D bioprinting technology. Bioprinting publishes research reports describing novel results with high clinical significance in all areas of 3D bioprinting research. Bioprinting issues contain a wide variety of review and analysis articles covering topics relevant to 3D bioprinting ranging from basic biological, material and technical advances to pre-clinical and clinical applications of 3D bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
3D and 4D printed materials for cardiac transplantation: Advances in biogenerative engineering Evolution of toxicity testing platforms from 2D to advanced 3D bioprinting for safety assessment of drugs Robust design optimization of Critical Quality Indicators (CQIs) of medical-graded polycaprolactone (PCL) in bioplotting Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: A review of applications and challenges Optimizing biomaterial inks: A study on the printability of Carboxymethyl cellulose-Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels and dental pulp stem cells bioprinting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1