Paradox blindness: How managers frame coopetition

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.06.001
Mika Yrjölä , Aleksi Niittymies , Abdollah Mohammadparast Tabas
{"title":"Paradox blindness: How managers frame coopetition","authors":"Mika Yrjölä ,&nbsp;Aleksi Niittymies ,&nbsp;Abdollah Mohammadparast Tabas","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Coopetition, characterized by the simultaneous pursuit of cooperation and competition, presents a paradoxical challenge for organizations and the individuals involved. This study explores managers' capacity to manage the inherent paradox of coopetition, focusing on the managerial framings and the various contextual factors shaping them. While the importance of coopetition-oriented mindsets, paradoxical frames, and cognitive and emotional capabilities is recognized for successful management of these challenges, more research is needed to understand how individual managers frame coopetition. The framing perspective is important, because it shows how managers make sense of and try to influence their own behavior as well as that of others. Utilizing a qualitative approach, we analyzed 26 interviews with top managers from 24 organizations within the same healthcare ecosystem. As a result, we develop a framework outlining three distinct paths to framing coopetition: conscious denial, acceptance, and unconscious denial, along with five specific framings. Our findings highlight the impact of these framings on managers' ability to manage coopetition effectively and the conditions shaping the different framings. Through these insights, this research advances our understanding of coopetition management and underscores the crucial role of context, enriching both theoretical discourse and practical application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000919/pdfft?md5=aee3ccd0ea0568b0481939c8eb614023&pid=1-s2.0-S0019850124000919-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124000919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coopetition, characterized by the simultaneous pursuit of cooperation and competition, presents a paradoxical challenge for organizations and the individuals involved. This study explores managers' capacity to manage the inherent paradox of coopetition, focusing on the managerial framings and the various contextual factors shaping them. While the importance of coopetition-oriented mindsets, paradoxical frames, and cognitive and emotional capabilities is recognized for successful management of these challenges, more research is needed to understand how individual managers frame coopetition. The framing perspective is important, because it shows how managers make sense of and try to influence their own behavior as well as that of others. Utilizing a qualitative approach, we analyzed 26 interviews with top managers from 24 organizations within the same healthcare ecosystem. As a result, we develop a framework outlining three distinct paths to framing coopetition: conscious denial, acceptance, and unconscious denial, along with five specific framings. Our findings highlight the impact of these framings on managers' ability to manage coopetition effectively and the conditions shaping the different framings. Through these insights, this research advances our understanding of coopetition management and underscores the crucial role of context, enriching both theoretical discourse and practical application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悖论盲点:管理者如何构建合作竞争
合作竞争的特点是同时追求合作与竞争,这给组织和相关个人带来了矛盾的挑战。本研究探讨了管理者管理合作竞争内在悖论的能力,重点是管理框架和影响这些框架的各种环境因素。虽然人们认识到以合作竞争为导向的思维方式、矛盾框架以及认知和情感能力对于成功应对这些挑战的重要性,但还需要更多的研究来了解管理者个人是如何构建合作竞争框架的。框架视角非常重要,因为它显示了管理者如何理解并试图影响自己和他人的行为。利用定性方法,我们分析了对同一医疗生态系统中 24 家组织的高层管理人员进行的 26 次访谈。结果,我们建立了一个框架,概述了构建合作竞争框架的三种不同途径:有意识的否认、接受和无意识的否认,以及五种具体的框架。我们的研究结果强调了这些框架对管理者有效管理合作竞争能力的影响,以及形成不同框架的条件。通过这些见解,本研究推进了我们对合作竞争管理的理解,并强调了背景的关键作用,丰富了理论论述和实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
期刊最新文献
Digital authenticity: Towards a research agenda for the AI-driven fifth phase of digitalization in business-to-business marketing Moving forward without resolution: Managing competing logics through a temporary agreement Channeling influence: The impact of downstream salesperson solution orientation within a business-to-business channel The balancing act: Organizational agility in fast-growing international ventures Exclusion and inclusion on business markets: Impacts of the Internet-Of-Things (IoT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1