Database of tall pre-Northridge steel moment frames for earthquake performance evaluations

Francisco A Galvis, G. Deierlein, C. Molina Hutt
{"title":"Database of tall pre-Northridge steel moment frames for earthquake performance evaluations","authors":"Francisco A Galvis, G. Deierlein, C. Molina Hutt","doi":"10.1177/87552930241256982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a detailed database of tall steel moment frame buildings that are representative of the construction practices in San Francisco prior to the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The database contains design details that affect the structural performance of steel moment frames, including frame geometry, member cross-section sizes, and gravity system characteristics. This database also captures irregularities that might impact seismic response, such as podiums, setbacks, mass concentrations (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) floors), interrupted column lines, and atriums. The database includes information on 89 moment frame buildings, 14 of which were built before 1960 and are constructed with riveted connections, while the remaining 75 have welded flange connections like those that suffered brittle fracture during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The buildings are further distinguished between space frame, perimeter frame, and partial space frame systems. For about half (41/89) of the buildings in the database, section sizes of representative structural members were collected, which enabled the evaluation of the seismic design, elastic, and inelastic response using computational workflows. The design diagnostics indicate that most of the buildings meet the minimum seismic strength and strong-column weak-beam requirements of modern building codes, even though they were not necessarily designed with this intent. On the contrary, about one-third of the buildings do not meet the seismic design drift limit of current codes, and about half of them have weak beam-column panel zones. This database, associated structural analysis models, and processing scripts are published at DesignSafe https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-wjad-r340 to facilitate collaboration and continued development of open-source data for high-resolution simulations to inform risk mitigation strategies on a regional scale.","PeriodicalId":505879,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":"136 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241256982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article describes a detailed database of tall steel moment frame buildings that are representative of the construction practices in San Francisco prior to the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The database contains design details that affect the structural performance of steel moment frames, including frame geometry, member cross-section sizes, and gravity system characteristics. This database also captures irregularities that might impact seismic response, such as podiums, setbacks, mass concentrations (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) floors), interrupted column lines, and atriums. The database includes information on 89 moment frame buildings, 14 of which were built before 1960 and are constructed with riveted connections, while the remaining 75 have welded flange connections like those that suffered brittle fracture during the 1994 Northridge earthquake. The buildings are further distinguished between space frame, perimeter frame, and partial space frame systems. For about half (41/89) of the buildings in the database, section sizes of representative structural members were collected, which enabled the evaluation of the seismic design, elastic, and inelastic response using computational workflows. The design diagnostics indicate that most of the buildings meet the minimum seismic strength and strong-column weak-beam requirements of modern building codes, even though they were not necessarily designed with this intent. On the contrary, about one-third of the buildings do not meet the seismic design drift limit of current codes, and about half of them have weak beam-column panel zones. This database, associated structural analysis models, and processing scripts are published at DesignSafe https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-wjad-r340 to facilitate collaboration and continued development of open-source data for high-resolution simulations to inform risk mitigation strategies on a regional scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于地震性能评估的北岭地震前高层钢弯矩框架数据库
本文介绍了一个详细的高层钢弯矩框架建筑数据库,该数据库代表了 1994 年北岭地震前旧金山的建筑实践。该数据库包含影响钢弯矩框架结构性能的设计细节,包括框架几何形状、构件截面尺寸和重力系统特征。该数据库还收集了可能影响地震响应的不规则情况,如裙房、后退、质量集中(机械、电气和管道 (MEP) 楼层)、柱线中断和中庭。该数据库包含 89 座弯矩框架建筑的信息,其中 14 座建于 1960 年之前,采用铆接连接,其余 75 座采用焊接翼缘连接,如在 1994 年北岭地震中发生脆性断裂的建筑。这些建筑还分为空间框架、周边框架和部分空间框架系统。数据库中约有一半的建筑(41/89)收集了代表性结构构件的截面尺寸,从而可以利用计算工作流对抗震设计、弹性和非弹性响应进行评估。设计诊断结果表明,大多数建筑物符合现代建筑规范的最低抗震强度和强柱弱梁要求,尽管它们在设计时并不一定考虑到这一点。相反,约有三分之一的建筑不符合现行规范的抗震设计漂移限值,约有一半的建筑存在弱梁柱板区。该数据库、相关结构分析模型和处理脚本发布在 DesignSafe https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-wjad-r340 网站上,以促进合作,并继续开发用于高分辨率模拟的开源数据,为区域范围内的风险缓解战略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling Impact of ground motion uncertainty evolution from post-earthquake data on building damage assessment Predicting the seismic ground-motion parameters: 3D physics-based numerical simulations combined with artificial neural networks Database of tall pre-Northridge steel moment frames for earthquake performance evaluations Comparing subduction ground-motion models to observations for Cascadia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1