Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling

Shako Mohammed, Rashid Shams, Chukuebuka C Nweke, T. Buckreis, Monica D Kohler, Y. Bozorgnia, Jonathan P Stewart
{"title":"Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling","authors":"Shako Mohammed, Rashid Shams, Chukuebuka C Nweke, T. Buckreis, Monica D Kohler, Y. Bozorgnia, Jonathan P Stewart","doi":"10.1177/87552930241267749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A source of ground-motion recordings in urban Los Angeles that has seen limited prior application is the Community Seismic Network (CSN), which uses low-cost, micro–electro–mechanical system (MEMS) sensors that are deployed at much higher densities than stations for other networks. We processed CSN data for the 29 earthquakes with M > 4 between July 2012 and January 2023 that produced CSN recordings, including selection of high- and low-pass corner frequencies ( fcHP and fcLP, respectively). Each record was classified as follows: (1) Broadband Record (BBR)—relatively broad usable frequency range from fcHP < 0.5 to fcLP > 10 Hz; (2) Narrowband Record (NBR)—limited usable frequency range relative to those for BBR; and (3) Rejected Record (REJ)—noise-dominated. We compare recordings from proximate (within 3 km) CSN and non-CSN stations (screened to only include cases of similar surface geology and favorable CSN instrument housing). We find similar high- to medium-frequency ground motions (i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA) and Sa for T < 5 s) from CSN BBR and non-CSN stations, whereas NBRs have lower amplitudes. We examine PGA distributions for BBR and REJ records and find them to be distinguished, on average across the network, at 0.005 g, whereas 0.0015 g was found to be the threshold between usable records (BBR and NBR) and pre-event noise. Recordings with amplitudes near or below these thresholds are generally noise-dominated, reflecting environmental and anthropogenic ground vibrations and instrument noise. We find nominally higher noise levels in areas of high-population density and lower noise levels by a factor of about 1.5 in low-population density areas. By applying the 0.0015 g threshold, limiting distances for the network-average site condition, based on the expected fifth-percentile ground-motion levels, are 89, 210, 280, and 370 km for M 5, 6, 7, and 8 events, respectively.","PeriodicalId":505879,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Spectra","volume":"7 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Spectra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87552930241267749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A source of ground-motion recordings in urban Los Angeles that has seen limited prior application is the Community Seismic Network (CSN), which uses low-cost, micro–electro–mechanical system (MEMS) sensors that are deployed at much higher densities than stations for other networks. We processed CSN data for the 29 earthquakes with M > 4 between July 2012 and January 2023 that produced CSN recordings, including selection of high- and low-pass corner frequencies ( fcHP and fcLP, respectively). Each record was classified as follows: (1) Broadband Record (BBR)—relatively broad usable frequency range from fcHP < 0.5 to fcLP > 10 Hz; (2) Narrowband Record (NBR)—limited usable frequency range relative to those for BBR; and (3) Rejected Record (REJ)—noise-dominated. We compare recordings from proximate (within 3 km) CSN and non-CSN stations (screened to only include cases of similar surface geology and favorable CSN instrument housing). We find similar high- to medium-frequency ground motions (i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA) and Sa for T < 5 s) from CSN BBR and non-CSN stations, whereas NBRs have lower amplitudes. We examine PGA distributions for BBR and REJ records and find them to be distinguished, on average across the network, at 0.005 g, whereas 0.0015 g was found to be the threshold between usable records (BBR and NBR) and pre-event noise. Recordings with amplitudes near or below these thresholds are generally noise-dominated, reflecting environmental and anthropogenic ground vibrations and instrument noise. We find nominally higher noise levels in areas of high-population density and lower noise levels by a factor of about 1.5 in low-population density areas. By applying the 0.0015 g threshold, limiting distances for the network-average site condition, based on the expected fifth-percentile ground-motion levels, are 89, 210, 280, and 370 km for M 5, 6, 7, and 8 events, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区地震网络记录在地动建模中的可用性
社区地震网络(Community Seismic Network,CSN)是洛杉矶城市地动记录的一个来源,但之前的应用非常有限,该网络使用低成本的微机电系统(MEMS)传感器,其部署密度远远高于其他网络的站点。我们处理了 2012 年 7 月至 2023 年 1 月期间发生的 29 次 M > 4 的地震的 CSN 数据,包括选择高通和低通角频率(分别为 fcHP 和 fcLP)。每条记录分类如下(1)宽带记录(BBR)--相对较宽的可用频率范围,从 fcHP 10 Hz 开始;(2)窄带记录(NBR)--相对于宽带记录的可用频率范围有限;(3)拒收记录(REJ)--以噪声为主。我们比较了邻近(3 公里以内)CSN 站和非 CSN 站的记录(经过筛选,只包括地表地质类似和有利 CSN 仪器安装的情况)。我们发现 CSN BBR 站和非 CSN 站的中高频地面运动(即峰值地面加速度 (PGA) 和 T < 5 s 的 Sa)相似,而 NBR 的振幅较低。我们检查了 BBR 和 REJ 记录的 PGA 分布,发现它们在整个网络中的平均值为 0.005 g,而 0.0015 g 是可用记录(BBR 和 NBR)与事件前噪声之间的临界值。振幅接近或低于这些临界值的记录一般以噪声为主,反映了环境和人为地面振动以及仪器噪声。我们发现,在人口密度高的地区,噪声水平名义上较高,而在人口密度低的地区,噪声水平则低约 1.5 倍。通过应用 0.0015 g 临界值,根据预期的第五百分位数地动水平,M 5、6、7 和 8 事件的网络平均站点条件的极限距离分别为 89、210、280 和 370 公里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability of Community Seismic Network recordings for ground-motion modeling Impact of ground motion uncertainty evolution from post-earthquake data on building damage assessment Predicting the seismic ground-motion parameters: 3D physics-based numerical simulations combined with artificial neural networks Database of tall pre-Northridge steel moment frames for earthquake performance evaluations Comparing subduction ground-motion models to observations for Cascadia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1