An evaluation of the impact of the Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework on the coach–athlete dyad across the age and stage spectrum in rugby union

Kevin Smith, Con Burns, Cian O’Neill, Noreen Quinn, Nick Winkelman, Matthew Wilkie, Edward K. Coughlan
{"title":"An evaluation of the impact of the Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework on the coach–athlete dyad across the age and stage spectrum in rugby union","authors":"Kevin Smith, Con Burns, Cian O’Neill, Noreen Quinn, Nick Winkelman, Matthew Wilkie, Edward K. Coughlan","doi":"10.1177/17479541241258702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to evaluate the implementation of the novel Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework (CEF) on coach–athlete interactions and perceptions. Participants were coaches (n = 4) and athletes (n = 54) from two rugby union teams. Coaches were observed pre-intervention and post-intervention of an education workshop based on the CEF and had nine training sessions video-recorded and analysed using the Coach Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Their perceptions of their relationship with their athletes were measured using the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Athlete perceptions of their coaches’ behaviours were measured using the Coaching Behaviour Scale for Sport (CBS-S). CAIS results revealed coaches increased the use of ‘Management’ and ‘Feedback’ behaviours ( p < 0.05) post-CEF, without altering prominent high-volume behaviours (e.g. ‘Instruction’). Coaches utilised similar time proportions for CAIS ‘Practice’, ‘Playing’ and ‘Management’ states, respectively, with no significant change post-CEF. CART-Q and CBS-S results revealed predominantly positive perceptions between coaches and athletes for both pre-CEF and post-CEF. Coach education is a non-linear learning process requiring consistent application over long periods of time, however, the alteration in coach behaviours post-CEF, coupled with the largely positive perceptions of both agents of the coach–athlete dyad, is an encouraging step forward for the further implementation of the CEF.","PeriodicalId":507869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","volume":"23 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241258702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the implementation of the novel Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework (CEF) on coach–athlete interactions and perceptions. Participants were coaches (n = 4) and athletes (n = 54) from two rugby union teams. Coaches were observed pre-intervention and post-intervention of an education workshop based on the CEF and had nine training sessions video-recorded and analysed using the Coach Analysis and Intervention System (CAIS). Their perceptions of their relationship with their athletes were measured using the Coach–Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q). Athlete perceptions of their coaches’ behaviours were measured using the Coaching Behaviour Scale for Sport (CBS-S). CAIS results revealed coaches increased the use of ‘Management’ and ‘Feedback’ behaviours ( p < 0.05) post-CEF, without altering prominent high-volume behaviours (e.g. ‘Instruction’). Coaches utilised similar time proportions for CAIS ‘Practice’, ‘Playing’ and ‘Management’ states, respectively, with no significant change post-CEF. CART-Q and CBS-S results revealed predominantly positive perceptions between coaches and athletes for both pre-CEF and post-CEF. Coach education is a non-linear learning process requiring consistent application over long periods of time, however, the alteration in coach behaviours post-CEF, coupled with the largely positive perceptions of both agents of the coach–athlete dyad, is an encouraging step forward for the further implementation of the CEF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估爱尔兰橄榄球联盟教练教育框架对橄榄球联盟中不同年龄和阶段的教练-运动员组合的影响
本研究的目的是评估爱尔兰橄榄球联盟教练教育框架(CEF)在教练与运动员互动和认知方面的实施情况。参与者为两支橄榄球队的教练员(4 人)和运动员(54 人)。对教练员进行了基于 CEF 的教育研讨会的干预前和干预后观察,并使用教练员分析和干预系统 (CAIS) 对九节训练课进行了录像和分析。使用教练与运动员关系问卷(CART-Q)测量了他们对自己与运动员关系的看法。运动员对教练员行为的看法采用体育教练行为量表(CBS-S)进行测量。CAIS 的结果显示,CEF 后,教练增加了 "管理 "和 "反馈 "行为的使用(P < 0.05),而没有改变突出的大容量行为(如 "指导")。教练分别在 CAIS "练习"、"比赛 "和 "管理 "状态下使用的时间比例相似,在 CEF 后没有发生显著变化。CART-Q和CBS-S结果表明,无论是在CEF前还是在CEF后,教练员和运动员对CART-Q和CBS-S的看法都以正面为主。教练员教育是一个非线性的学习过程,需要长期坚持不懈的应用,然而,教练员行为在继续教育课程后的改变,以及教练员和运动员双方对继续教育课程的积极看法,都为继续实施继续教育课程迈出了令人鼓舞的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soccer—The disrupted game: Perturbations as a cause for scoring success An evaluation of the impact of the Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework on the coach–athlete dyad across the age and stage spectrum in rugby union Zones where corner kicks are most effective in the penalty box: Is there a sweet spot? Spatial partitioning of the football pitch based on successful passing paths Weekly accumulative external load based on participation in football matches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1