Zones where corner kicks are most effective in the penalty box: Is there a sweet spot?

Onur Tütüncü, Saumya Mehta, Daniel Memmert
{"title":"Zones where corner kicks are most effective in the penalty box: Is there a sweet spot?","authors":"Onur Tütüncü, Saumya Mehta, Daniel Memmert","doi":"10.1177/17479541241256223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of corner kicks, analyze the goal patterns resulting from corner kicks, and develop a model for the implementation of optimal corner kick strategies. The study used a descriptive retrospective design, and the data consisted of 455.898 corner kicks from matches played by 768 teams in 33 different leagues and an international tournament (UEFA). Six different models based on logistic regression were developed and analyzed. The results showed that more goals were scored from certain zones (1c, 2b, and 2c) inside the penalty area than from others ( p < 0.001). According to logistic regression, zones 1c and 2c increased the probability of scoring a goal by 1.12 and 1.08 times, respectively, compared to other regions. In addition, it is noticeable that the probability of scoring from the zones varies considerably depending on the type of kick. Further results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between goals scored from in-swing and out-swing corners, but significant differences were found for the other types of corners. Finally, 3.1% of all corners resulted in goals, and 69% of those goals resulted in a draw or the team taking the lead in the match. For these reasons, it is important to develop new corner-kick strategies in order to score goals and win matches.","PeriodicalId":507869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","volume":"54 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science &amp; Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241256223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of corner kicks, analyze the goal patterns resulting from corner kicks, and develop a model for the implementation of optimal corner kick strategies. The study used a descriptive retrospective design, and the data consisted of 455.898 corner kicks from matches played by 768 teams in 33 different leagues and an international tournament (UEFA). Six different models based on logistic regression were developed and analyzed. The results showed that more goals were scored from certain zones (1c, 2b, and 2c) inside the penalty area than from others ( p < 0.001). According to logistic regression, zones 1c and 2c increased the probability of scoring a goal by 1.12 and 1.08 times, respectively, compared to other regions. In addition, it is noticeable that the probability of scoring from the zones varies considerably depending on the type of kick. Further results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between goals scored from in-swing and out-swing corners, but significant differences were found for the other types of corners. Finally, 3.1% of all corners resulted in goals, and 69% of those goals resulted in a draw or the team taking the lead in the match. For these reasons, it is important to develop new corner-kick strategies in order to score goals and win matches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
角球在禁区内最有效的区域:是否存在最佳位置?
本研究旨在评估角球的有效性,分析角球造成的进球模式,并为实施最佳角球策略建立模型。研究采用了描述性回顾设计,数据包括来自 33 个不同联赛和一项国际赛事(欧足联)的 768 支球队所踢比赛的 455.898 个角球。在逻辑回归的基础上建立并分析了六个不同的模型。结果显示,禁区内某些区域(1c、2b 和 2c)的进球数多于其他区域(P < 0.001)。根据逻辑回归,与其他区域相比,1c 区和 2c 区的进球概率分别增加了 1.12 倍和 1.08 倍。此外,值得注意的是,根据踢球类型的不同,各区的进球概率也有很大差异。进一步的结果表明,在统计上,摆入角球和摆出角球的进球数没有显著差异,但在其他类型的角球中发现了显著差异。最后,3.1% 的角球导致了进球,其中 69% 的进球导致了平局或球队在比赛中领先。因此,为了进球和赢得比赛,制定新的角球战术非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soccer—The disrupted game: Perturbations as a cause for scoring success An evaluation of the impact of the Irish Rugby Football Union Coach Education Framework on the coach–athlete dyad across the age and stage spectrum in rugby union Zones where corner kicks are most effective in the penalty box: Is there a sweet spot? Spatial partitioning of the football pitch based on successful passing paths Weekly accumulative external load based on participation in football matches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1