Exploring publication networks with a local cohesion-maximizing algorithm

IF 4.1 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Quantitative Science Studies Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1162/qss_a_00314
Matthias Held, Jochen Gläser
{"title":"Exploring publication networks with a local cohesion-maximizing algorithm","authors":"Matthias Held, Jochen Gläser","doi":"10.1162/qss_a_00314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Global algorithms have taken precedence in bibliometrics as approaches to the reconstruction of topics from networks of publications. They partition a large set of publications and the resulting disjoint clusters are then interpreted as individual topics. This is at odds with a sociological understanding of topics as formed by the participants working on and being influenced by them, an understanding that is best operationalized by algorithms prioritizing cohesion rather than separation, by using local information and by allowing topics to overlap. Thus, a different kind of algorithm is needed for topic reconstruction to be successful. Local algorithms represent a promising solution. In this paper, we present for consideration a new Multilayered, Adjustable, Local Bibliometric Algorithm (MALBA), which is in line with sociological definitions of topics and reconstructs dense regions in bibliometric networks locally. MALBA grows a subgraph from a publications seed either by interacting with a fixed network dataset, or by querying an online database to obtain up-to-date linkage information. New candidates for addition are evaluated by assessing the links in two data models. Experiments with publications on the h-index and with ground truth data positioned in a dataset of AMO physics illustrate the properties of MALBA and its potential.\n \n \n https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00314\n","PeriodicalId":34021,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Science Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Science Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global algorithms have taken precedence in bibliometrics as approaches to the reconstruction of topics from networks of publications. They partition a large set of publications and the resulting disjoint clusters are then interpreted as individual topics. This is at odds with a sociological understanding of topics as formed by the participants working on and being influenced by them, an understanding that is best operationalized by algorithms prioritizing cohesion rather than separation, by using local information and by allowing topics to overlap. Thus, a different kind of algorithm is needed for topic reconstruction to be successful. Local algorithms represent a promising solution. In this paper, we present for consideration a new Multilayered, Adjustable, Local Bibliometric Algorithm (MALBA), which is in line with sociological definitions of topics and reconstructs dense regions in bibliometric networks locally. MALBA grows a subgraph from a publications seed either by interacting with a fixed network dataset, or by querying an online database to obtain up-to-date linkage information. New candidates for addition are evaluated by assessing the links in two data models. Experiments with publications on the h-index and with ground truth data positioned in a dataset of AMO physics illustrate the properties of MALBA and its potential. https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00314
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用局部内聚力最大化算法探索出版网络
作为从出版物网络中重建主题的方法,全局算法在文献计量学中占据了主导地位。它们对大量出版物进行分区,然后将由此产生的不相连的聚类解释为单个主题。这与社会学对主题的理解相悖,社会学认为主题是由研究主题并受其影响的参与者形成的,而这种理解的最佳操作方式是算法优先考虑内聚而非分离,使用本地信息并允许主题重叠。因此,要想成功进行话题重构,需要一种不同的算法。本地算法是一种很有前途的解决方案。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的多层、可调整、本地文献计量算法(MALBA)供大家参考,该算法符合社会学对主题的定义,可在本地重建文献计量网络中的密集区域。MALBA 通过与固定的网络数据集交互,或通过查询在线数据库以获取最新的链接信息,从出版物种子中生成子图。通过评估两个数据模型中的链接来评估新的候选添加子图。利用 h 指数上的出版物和 AMO 物理数据集中的地面实况数据进行的实验说明了 MALBA 的特性及其潜力。https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer-review/10.1162/qss_a_00314。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Science Studies
Quantitative Science Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The development of a research intelligence tool for rare disease research in the Netherlands Real influence: A novel approach to characterize the visibility of journals and publications Research funding in different SCI disciplines: A comparison analysis based on Web of Science Exploring publication networks with a local cohesion-maximizing algorithm Latent Variable Modeling of Scientific Impact: Estimation of the Q Model Parameters with Structural Equation Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1