Automatic cross-validation in structured models: Is it time to leave out leave-one-out?

IF 2.1 2区 数学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Spatial Statistics Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100843
Aritz Adin , Elias Teixeira Krainski , Amanda Lenzi , Zhedong Liu , Joaquín Martínez-Minaya , Håvard Rue
{"title":"Automatic cross-validation in structured models: Is it time to leave out leave-one-out?","authors":"Aritz Adin ,&nbsp;Elias Teixeira Krainski ,&nbsp;Amanda Lenzi ,&nbsp;Zhedong Liu ,&nbsp;Joaquín Martínez-Minaya ,&nbsp;Håvard Rue","doi":"10.1016/j.spasta.2024.100843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Standard techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) might not be suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of models incorporating structured random effects. In such cases, the correlation between the training and test sets could have a notable impact on the model’s prediction error. To overcome this issue, an automatic group construction procedure for leave-group-out cross validation (LGOCV) has recently emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing predictive performance measurement in structured models. The purpose of this paper is (i) to compare LOOCV and LGOCV within structured models, emphasizing model selection and predictive performance, and (ii) to provide real data applications in spatial statistics using complex structured models fitted with INLA, showcasing the utility of the automatic LGOCV method. First, we briefly review the key aspects of the recently proposed LGOCV method for automatic group construction in latent Gaussian models. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for selecting the model with the highest predictive performance by simulating extrapolation tasks in both temporal and spatial data analyses. Finally, we provide insights into the effectiveness of the LGOCV method in modeling complex structured data, encompassing spatio-temporal multivariate count data, spatial compositional data, and spatio-temporal geospatial data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48771,"journal":{"name":"Spatial Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000344/pdfft?md5=58ade5e28808d907246b86bb20b2c270&pid=1-s2.0-S2211675324000344-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spatial Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211675324000344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard techniques such as leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) might not be suitable for evaluating the predictive performance of models incorporating structured random effects. In such cases, the correlation between the training and test sets could have a notable impact on the model’s prediction error. To overcome this issue, an automatic group construction procedure for leave-group-out cross validation (LGOCV) has recently emerged as a valuable tool for enhancing predictive performance measurement in structured models. The purpose of this paper is (i) to compare LOOCV and LGOCV within structured models, emphasizing model selection and predictive performance, and (ii) to provide real data applications in spatial statistics using complex structured models fitted with INLA, showcasing the utility of the automatic LGOCV method. First, we briefly review the key aspects of the recently proposed LGOCV method for automatic group construction in latent Gaussian models. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of this method for selecting the model with the highest predictive performance by simulating extrapolation tasks in both temporal and spatial data analyses. Finally, we provide insights into the effectiveness of the LGOCV method in modeling complex structured data, encompassing spatio-temporal multivariate count data, spatial compositional data, and spatio-temporal geospatial data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结构化模型中的自动交叉验证:是时候摒弃 "leave-one-out "了吗?
留一交叉验证(LOOCV)等标准技术可能不适合评估包含结构随机效应的模型的预测性能。在这种情况下,训练集和测试集之间的相关性可能会对模型的预测误差产生显著影响。为了克服这一问题,最近出现了一种用于留空交叉验证(LGOCV)的自动建组程序,它是提高结构化模型预测性能测量的重要工具。本文的目的是:(i) 比较结构化模型中的 LOOCV 和 LGOCV,强调模型选择和预测性能;(ii) 提供空间统计学中使用 INLA 拟合的复杂结构化模型的实际数据应用,展示自动 LGOCV 方法的实用性。首先,我们简要回顾了最近提出的在潜在高斯模型中自动构建分组的 LGOCV 方法的主要方面。我们还通过模拟时间和空间数据分析中的外推任务,展示了该方法在选择预测性能最高的模型方面的有效性。最后,我们深入探讨了 LGOCV 方法在复杂结构数据建模中的有效性,包括时空多变量计数数据、空间组合数据和时空地理空间数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spatial Statistics
Spatial Statistics GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
21.70%
发文量
89
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Spatial Statistics publishes articles on the theory and application of spatial and spatio-temporal statistics. It favours manuscripts that present theory generated by new applications, or in which new theory is applied to an important practical case. A purely theoretical study will only rarely be accepted. Pure case studies without methodological development are not acceptable for publication. Spatial statistics concerns the quantitative analysis of spatial and spatio-temporal data, including their statistical dependencies, accuracy and uncertainties. Methodology for spatial statistics is typically found in probability theory, stochastic modelling and mathematical statistics as well as in information science. Spatial statistics is used in mapping, assessing spatial data quality, sampling design optimisation, modelling of dependence structures, and drawing of valid inference from a limited set of spatio-temporal data.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering hidden alignments in two-dimensional point fields Spatio-temporal data fusion for the analysis of in situ and remote sensing data using the INLA-SPDE approach Exploiting nearest-neighbour maps for estimating the variance of sample mean in equal-probability systematic sampling of spatial populations Variable selection of nonparametric spatial autoregressive models via deep learning Estimation and inference of multi-effect generalized geographically and temporally weighted regression models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1