The feasibility of a social media-based foot self-management education and support program for adults with diabetes: A partially randomized preference trial

Helen Ngozichukwuka Obilor , Olena Veryha , Tom Weisz , Mariam Botros , Rosemary Wilson , Joan Tranmer , Kevin Woo
{"title":"The feasibility of a social media-based foot self-management education and support program for adults with diabetes: A partially randomized preference trial","authors":"Helen Ngozichukwuka Obilor ,&nbsp;Olena Veryha ,&nbsp;Tom Weisz ,&nbsp;Mariam Botros ,&nbsp;Rosemary Wilson ,&nbsp;Joan Tranmer ,&nbsp;Kevin Woo","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the feasibility of Diabetic Foot Care Group (DFCG), a social media-based self-management education and support intervention, for people with diabetes (PWD) empowerment in diabetes-related foot ulceration prevention.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A partially randomized preference trial was conducted among 32 PWD. DFCG was implemented through Facebook. Participants in the intervention group joined the DFCG in addition to their usual care, while the control group received usual care. Data were collected online using questionnaires on participants' DFCG acceptance, engagement and preliminary efficacy on nine diabetes foot care-related outcomes at baseline, one, and three months post-intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The participants' study intervention acceptability and engagement rates were 84.2% and 55.2%, respectively. DFCG efficacy rate compared to usual care was 88.9% to 22.2%. Three diabetes foot care-related outcomes increased significantly in the intervention group three-month post-intervention: foot self-care adherence (<em>p</em> = 0.001, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.35), preventive foot self-care practice (<em>p</em> = 0.002, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.33), and physical health status (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.02, η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.23).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DFCG is feasible and could effectively improve diabetes foot care-related outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>Social media is an innovative approach healthcare professionals could utilize to virtually support PWD in ongoing learning and engagement in optimal foot self-care activities.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg>, Identifier: <span>NCT04395521</span><svg><path></path></svg></p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000554/pdfft?md5=27e98188586029606364a84fdc40e941&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000554-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To assess the feasibility of Diabetic Foot Care Group (DFCG), a social media-based self-management education and support intervention, for people with diabetes (PWD) empowerment in diabetes-related foot ulceration prevention.

Methods

A partially randomized preference trial was conducted among 32 PWD. DFCG was implemented through Facebook. Participants in the intervention group joined the DFCG in addition to their usual care, while the control group received usual care. Data were collected online using questionnaires on participants' DFCG acceptance, engagement and preliminary efficacy on nine diabetes foot care-related outcomes at baseline, one, and three months post-intervention.

Results

The participants' study intervention acceptability and engagement rates were 84.2% and 55.2%, respectively. DFCG efficacy rate compared to usual care was 88.9% to 22.2%. Three diabetes foot care-related outcomes increased significantly in the intervention group three-month post-intervention: foot self-care adherence (p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.35), preventive foot self-care practice (p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.33), and physical health status (p < 0.02, ηp2 = 0.23).

Conclusion

DFCG is feasible and could effectively improve diabetes foot care-related outcomes.

Innovation

Social media is an innovative approach healthcare professionals could utilize to virtually support PWD in ongoing learning and engagement in optimal foot self-care activities.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT04395521

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于社交媒体的成人糖尿病足自我管理教育和支持计划的可行性:部分随机偏好试验
目的评估糖尿病足护理小组(DFCG)的可行性,该小组是一项基于社交媒体的自我管理教育和支持干预措施,旨在增强糖尿病患者预防糖尿病足溃疡的能力。通过 Facebook 实施了 DFCG。干预组的参与者除接受常规护理外,还参加了 DFCG,而对照组则接受常规护理。在基线、干预后一个月和三个月,通过问卷在线收集参与者对 DFCG 的接受度、参与度以及对九项糖尿病足护理相关结果的初步疗效等数据。与常规护理相比,DFCG的有效率为88.9%比22.2%。干预后三个月,干预组的三个糖尿病足护理相关结果显著增加:足部自我护理依从性(p = 0.001,ηp2 = 0.35)、预防性足部自我护理实践(p = 0.002,ηp2 = 0.33)和身体健康状况(p < 0.02,ηp2 = 0.23)。创新社交媒体是一种创新方法,医护人员可以利用它来虚拟支持残疾人持续学习和参与最佳足部自我护理活动。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,Identifier:NCT04395521
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1