Hydrogen storage systems performance and design parameters using response surface methods and sensitivity analysis

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-29 DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114628
Saurabh Tiwari , Akshay Kumar , Nandlal Gupta , Gaurav Tiwari , Pratibha Sharma
{"title":"Hydrogen storage systems performance and design parameters using response surface methods and sensitivity analysis","authors":"Saurabh Tiwari ,&nbsp;Akshay Kumar ,&nbsp;Nandlal Gupta ,&nbsp;Gaurav Tiwari ,&nbsp;Pratibha Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.114628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Design</h3><p>Design of metal hydride-based hydrogen storage reactors is often performed using numerical/experimental modelling which is computationally/economically difficult. This paper investigates the applicability of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) coupled Local/Global Sensitivity Analysis (L/GSA) to investigate – i) the applicability of advanced RSMs in predicting the responses for storage systems efficiently, ii) the applicability of advanced RSMs to perform L/GSA to identify the sensitive input design parameters based on their effect on the Outputs of Interests (OIs), i.e., reaction fraction (i.e., <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span>) and bed temperature (i.e., <span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span>), and iii) the dependence of importance ranking of design parameters on the employed L/GSA methodology. The study is conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the most accurate <span>RSM</span> was identified among fourteen traditional and advanced RSMs, i.e., radial basis, kriging, quadratic, moving least square, support vector machine etc., employing a measure of precision, i.e., Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). RSMs were constructed based on the values of OIs estimated using finite element simulation using COMSOL software for random realizations of inputs generated via Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). In the second stage, the importance ranking of design parameters was estimated for both OIs using six different L/GSAs based on the input-output relationships estimated in stage one. All the codes of RSMs and L/GSAs were written and validated in MATLAB. Finite element simulations of the random realizations were performed using COMSOL software. For the present study, NSEs of the considered RSMs were ranging between 0.6262-0.8544 and 0.4652–0.8081 for <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span> respectively, indicating the importance of selection of appropriate RSM. RBF-augmented Compact-I and kriging were the most accurate RSMs with NSEs approximately 10%–20 % higher to those of frequently used polynomial RSM. Time (<span><math><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow></math></span>) and mass of hydrogen to be stored (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>M</mi><mi>H</mi></msub></mrow></math></span>) were the most; and external temperature (<span><math><mrow><msub><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>x</mi><mi>t</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) and porosity (<span><math><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow></math></span>) were the least sensitive inputs corresponding to <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow></math></span> and <span><math><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow></math></span>, with differences of 80–90 % in the sensitivity indices respectively. The ranking prediction was highly dependent upon the employed L/GSA methodology, with Morris's screening observed to be the least accurate. The RSM methods described in this study help to design and investigate the metal hydride reactors for various applications (space heating, hydrogen storage, storage for vehicular application, metal hydride compressor) without undergoing detailed mathematical modelling of the system. The proposed methodology may significantly assist the designers to focus (or vary) on the sensitive inputs only during the physical modelling of systems to improve their performance. This sensitivity analysis is helpful to find out the most advance sensitivity analysis method which can be used to find out the most sensitivity parameter which can be varied according to their rankings to achieve the required performance of metal hydride reactor for the particular application. The advanced RSMs assist to identify these sensitive inputs quickly by reducing the mathematical efforts in the L/GSA by providing the accurate input-OIs relationships based on the limited numerical simulations. This will significantly save the resources and time of industries required in physical modelling/numerical simulations significantly, which otherwise would have been invested on investigating the non-sensitive inputs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403212400354X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design

Design of metal hydride-based hydrogen storage reactors is often performed using numerical/experimental modelling which is computationally/economically difficult. This paper investigates the applicability of Response Surface Methodology (RSM) coupled Local/Global Sensitivity Analysis (L/GSA) to investigate – i) the applicability of advanced RSMs in predicting the responses for storage systems efficiently, ii) the applicability of advanced RSMs to perform L/GSA to identify the sensitive input design parameters based on their effect on the Outputs of Interests (OIs), i.e., reaction fraction (i.e., C) and bed temperature (i.e., T), and iii) the dependence of importance ranking of design parameters on the employed L/GSA methodology. The study is conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the most accurate RSM was identified among fourteen traditional and advanced RSMs, i.e., radial basis, kriging, quadratic, moving least square, support vector machine etc., employing a measure of precision, i.e., Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). RSMs were constructed based on the values of OIs estimated using finite element simulation using COMSOL software for random realizations of inputs generated via Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). In the second stage, the importance ranking of design parameters was estimated for both OIs using six different L/GSAs based on the input-output relationships estimated in stage one. All the codes of RSMs and L/GSAs were written and validated in MATLAB. Finite element simulations of the random realizations were performed using COMSOL software. For the present study, NSEs of the considered RSMs were ranging between 0.6262-0.8544 and 0.4652–0.8081 for C and T respectively, indicating the importance of selection of appropriate RSM. RBF-augmented Compact-I and kriging were the most accurate RSMs with NSEs approximately 10%–20 % higher to those of frequently used polynomial RSM. Time (t) and mass of hydrogen to be stored (MH) were the most; and external temperature (Text) and porosity (E) were the least sensitive inputs corresponding to C and T, with differences of 80–90 % in the sensitivity indices respectively. The ranking prediction was highly dependent upon the employed L/GSA methodology, with Morris's screening observed to be the least accurate. The RSM methods described in this study help to design and investigate the metal hydride reactors for various applications (space heating, hydrogen storage, storage for vehicular application, metal hydride compressor) without undergoing detailed mathematical modelling of the system. The proposed methodology may significantly assist the designers to focus (or vary) on the sensitive inputs only during the physical modelling of systems to improve their performance. This sensitivity analysis is helpful to find out the most advance sensitivity analysis method which can be used to find out the most sensitivity parameter which can be varied according to their rankings to achieve the required performance of metal hydride reactor for the particular application. The advanced RSMs assist to identify these sensitive inputs quickly by reducing the mathematical efforts in the L/GSA by providing the accurate input-OIs relationships based on the limited numerical simulations. This will significantly save the resources and time of industries required in physical modelling/numerical simulations significantly, which otherwise would have been invested on investigating the non-sensitive inputs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用响应面方法和敏感性分析确定储氢系统的性能和设计参数
基于金属氢化物的储氢反应器的设计通常使用数值/实验建模,这在计算/经济上都很困难。本文研究了响应面方法 (RSM) 结合局部/全局敏感性分析 (L/GSA) 的适用性,以调查 - i) 高级 RSM 在有效预测储氢系统响应方面的适用性,ii) 高级 RSM 在执行 L/GSA 方面的适用性,以根据其对相关输出 (OIs) 的影响确定敏感的输入设计参数,即反应分数(即 C)和床层温度(即 C)、(iii) 设计参数的重要性排序与所采用的 L/GSA 方法的关系。研究分两个阶段进行。在第一阶段,从 14 种传统和先进的 RSM(即径向基、克里金、二次方、移动最小平方、支持向量机等)中确定了最精确的 RSM,并采用了一种精度测量方法,即纳什-苏特克利夫效率(NSE)。RSM 是根据使用 COMSOL 软件对拉丁超立方采样(LHS)生成的随机输入现实进行有限元模拟估算的 OIs 值构建的。在第二阶段,根据第一阶段估算的输入输出关系,使用六种不同的 L/GSA 对两个 OI 估算设计参数的重要性排序。所有 RSM 和 L/GSA 的代码都是在 MATLAB 中编写和验证的。使用 COMSOL 软件对随机实现进行了有限元模拟。在本研究中,所考虑的 RSM 对 C 和 T 的 NSE 分别为 0.6262-0.8544 和 0.4652-0.8081 之间,这表明选择合适的 RSM 非常重要。RBF-augmented Compact-I 和克里金法是最精确的 RSM,其净现值比常用的多项式 RSM 高出约 10%-20%。与 C 和 T 相对应,时间 (t) 和待存储氢的质量 (MH) 是最敏感的输入;外部温度 (Text) 和孔隙度 (E) 是最不敏感的输入,敏感度指数分别相差 80%-90% 。排序预测在很大程度上取决于所采用的 L/GSA 方法,其中莫里斯筛选法的准确性最低。本研究中描述的 RSM 方法有助于设计和研究各种应用(空间加热、氢存储、车辆应用存储、金属氢化物压缩机)的金属氢化物反应器,而无需对系统进行详细的数学建模。所提出的方法可以极大地帮助设计人员在对系统进行物理建模时只关注(或改变)敏感输入,以提高系统性能。这种灵敏度分析有助于找出最先进的灵敏度分析方法,可用于找出最灵敏的参数,根据这些参数的排名进行更改,以达到特定应用所需的金属氢化物反应器性能。先进的 RSM 可以在有限的数值模拟基础上提供精确的输入-输出关系,从而减少 L/GSA 中的数学工作量,帮助快速确定这些敏感输入。这将大大节省工业界在物理建模/数值模拟方面所需的资源和时间,而这些资源和时间本可以用于研究非敏感输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
期刊最新文献
Affordable green materials for developed cool roof applications: A review Thermo-economic multi-objective optimisation of a solar cooling system Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings Rationale for adding batteries to hydropower plants and tradeoffs in hybrid system operation: A review Hourly solar radiation estimation and uncertainty quantification using hybrid models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1