FBMC vs. PAM and DMT for High-Speed Wireline Communication

IF 2.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE open journal of circuits and systems Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1109/OJCAS.2024.3410020
Jeremy Cosson-Martin;Jhoan Salinas;Hossein Shakiba;Ali Sheikholeslami
{"title":"FBMC vs. PAM and DMT for High-Speed Wireline Communication","authors":"Jeremy Cosson-Martin;Jhoan Salinas;Hossein Shakiba;Ali Sheikholeslami","doi":"10.1109/OJCAS.2024.3410020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates the first silicon-verified FBMC encoder and decoder designed to emulate beyond \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$224Gb/s$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n wireline communication. It also compares the performance of FBMC to PAM and DMT in three steps. First, the digital power and area consumption are compared using measured results from the manufactured test chip. Second, the data rate is determined using lab-measured results. And third, the performance when subject to notched channels is analyzed using simulation results. Finally, we present a method to emulate wireline links while reducing the emulator complexity and simulation time by one to two orders of magnitude over conventional over-sampled techniques. Our analysis indicates that given a smooth channel and an SNR which enables an average spectral efficiency of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$4bits/sec/Hz$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n at a bit-error rate of 10-3, both DMT and FBMC perform similarly to a conventional PAM-4 link. However, when noise is reduced and a spectral notch is applied, thereby achieving an average spectral efficiency of \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$4.6bits/sec/Hz$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, DMT and FBMC can outperform PAM by 2.1 and 2.3 times, respectively. In addition, we estimate FBMC’s encoder and decoder power consumption at \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$1.53pJ/b$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$1.98pJ/b$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, respectively, and area requirement at \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$0.07mm^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$0.17mm^{2}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n, respectively, which is similar to DMT. These values are competitive with similar \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$22nm$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n PAM transceivers, suggesting that DMT and FBMC are viable alternatives to PAM for next-generation high-speed wireline applications.","PeriodicalId":93442,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of circuits and systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10549936","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of circuits and systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10549936/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the first silicon-verified FBMC encoder and decoder designed to emulate beyond $224Gb/s$ wireline communication. It also compares the performance of FBMC to PAM and DMT in three steps. First, the digital power and area consumption are compared using measured results from the manufactured test chip. Second, the data rate is determined using lab-measured results. And third, the performance when subject to notched channels is analyzed using simulation results. Finally, we present a method to emulate wireline links while reducing the emulator complexity and simulation time by one to two orders of magnitude over conventional over-sampled techniques. Our analysis indicates that given a smooth channel and an SNR which enables an average spectral efficiency of $4bits/sec/Hz$ at a bit-error rate of 10-3, both DMT and FBMC perform similarly to a conventional PAM-4 link. However, when noise is reduced and a spectral notch is applied, thereby achieving an average spectral efficiency of $4.6bits/sec/Hz$ , DMT and FBMC can outperform PAM by 2.1 and 2.3 times, respectively. In addition, we estimate FBMC’s encoder and decoder power consumption at $1.53pJ/b$ and $1.98pJ/b$ , respectively, and area requirement at $0.07mm^{2}$ and $0.17mm^{2}$ , respectively, which is similar to DMT. These values are competitive with similar $22nm$ PAM transceivers, suggesting that DMT and FBMC are viable alternatives to PAM for next-generation high-speed wireline applications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于高速有线通信的 FBMC 与 PAM 和 DMT 的比较
本文展示了首个经过硅验证的 FBMC 编码器和解码器,设计用于模拟超过 224Gb/s$ 的有线通信。它还分三步比较了 FBMC 与 PAM 和 DMT 的性能。首先,利用制造的测试芯片的测量结果比较数字功耗和面积消耗。其次,利用实验室测量结果确定数据传输率。第三,利用仿真结果分析受缺口信道影响时的性能。最后,我们提出了一种仿真有线链路的方法,同时将仿真器的复杂性和仿真时间降低了一到两个数量级,超过了传统的过采样技术。我们的分析表明,在平滑信道和信噪比(SNR)条件下,当误码率为 10-3 时,平均频谱效率为 $4bits/sec/Hz$,DMT 和 FBMC 的性能与传统 PAM-4 链路类似。然而,当降低噪声并应用频谱陷波,从而实现平均 4.6 比特/秒/赫兹的频谱效率时,DMT 和 FBMC 的性能分别是 PAM 的 2.1 倍和 2.3 倍。此外,我们估计 FBMC 的编码器和解码器功耗分别为 1.53pJ/b$ 和 1.98pJ/b$,面积要求分别为 0.07mm^{2}$ 和 0.17mm^{2}$,与 DMT 相似。这些数值与类似的 22nm$ PAM 收发器相比具有竞争力,表明 DMT 和 FBMC 是下一代高速有线应用中 PAM 的可行替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Companding Technique to Reduce Peak-to-Average Ratio in Discrete Multitone Wireline Receivers Low-Power On-Chip Energy Harvesting: From Interface Circuits Perspective A 10 GHz Dual-Loop PLL With Active Cycle-Jitter Correction Achieving 12dB Spur and 29% Jitter Reduction A 45Gb/s Analog Multi-Tone Receiver Utilizing a 6-Tap MIMO-FFE in 22nm FDSOI FBMC vs. PAM and DMT for High-Speed Wireline Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1