A Better Argument for Tawḥīd?: Philosophical Discussions of Divine Attributes in the Sharḥ Al-ʿaqāid Tradition

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Sophia Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1007/s11841-024-01018-w
Mehmet Fatih Arslan
{"title":"A Better Argument for Tawḥīd?: Philosophical Discussions of Divine Attributes in the Sharḥ Al-ʿaqāid Tradition","authors":"Mehmet Fatih Arslan","doi":"10.1007/s11841-024-01018-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on al-Taftāzānī’s discussion of the ontological status of divine attributes in his <i>Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid</i> and aims to demonstrate that al-Rāzī’s (d. 606/1210) reluctantly and ambiguously proposed formula that divine attributes are possible by themselves and necessary by God, which itself is an adaptation of Avicennian formula about the ontological status of the divine intellects, received much more recognition after a more sophisticated and advanced version of it was introduced to Sunnī <i>kalām</i> tradition by al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390). His improvements generated a considerable amount of intellectual interest within the subsequent commentary and super-commentary tradition and were then refined by the later commentators, a crucial development which has been almost entirely neglected in the modern scholarship. This study further argues that the orientation of post-classical <i>kalām</i> extends to the point where it embraces a specific formula promoted by the <i>Falāsifa</i> to refine Sunnī theory about the ontological status of the divine attributes. Consequently, Sunnī theology deliberately adapted a previously rejected theory to one of its most exclusive and core subjects, that is the discussion of the divine attributes. This study will also show that dramatic transformations in the approach and the structure indicate that Sunnī <i>kalām</i>, especially in <i>Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid</i> commentaries and super-commentaries, was significantly influenced by philosophical theories and was required to adopt both the vocabulary and the framework fashioned in philosophical debates on a greater scale after its first transformation due to al-Rāzī’s influence. Because of the voluminous commentaries and super-commentaries on <i>Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid</i> and their extended coverage of a variety of subjects, the current study limits itself to al-Taftāzānī’s <i>Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid</i> and its super-commentaries by Musa Khayālī (d. 862/1457) and Ramazan Efendi al-Ḥanafī (d. 1025/1616?).</p>","PeriodicalId":44736,"journal":{"name":"Sophia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-024-01018-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on al-Taftāzānī’s discussion of the ontological status of divine attributes in his Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid and aims to demonstrate that al-Rāzī’s (d. 606/1210) reluctantly and ambiguously proposed formula that divine attributes are possible by themselves and necessary by God, which itself is an adaptation of Avicennian formula about the ontological status of the divine intellects, received much more recognition after a more sophisticated and advanced version of it was introduced to Sunnī kalām tradition by al-Taftāzānī (d. 792/1390). His improvements generated a considerable amount of intellectual interest within the subsequent commentary and super-commentary tradition and were then refined by the later commentators, a crucial development which has been almost entirely neglected in the modern scholarship. This study further argues that the orientation of post-classical kalām extends to the point where it embraces a specific formula promoted by the Falāsifa to refine Sunnī theory about the ontological status of the divine attributes. Consequently, Sunnī theology deliberately adapted a previously rejected theory to one of its most exclusive and core subjects, that is the discussion of the divine attributes. This study will also show that dramatic transformations in the approach and the structure indicate that Sunnī kalām, especially in Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid commentaries and super-commentaries, was significantly influenced by philosophical theories and was required to adopt both the vocabulary and the framework fashioned in philosophical debates on a greater scale after its first transformation due to al-Rāzī’s influence. Because of the voluminous commentaries and super-commentaries on Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid and their extended coverage of a variety of subjects, the current study limits itself to al-Taftāzānī’s Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid and its super-commentaries by Musa Khayālī (d. 862/1457) and Ramazan Efendi al-Ḥanafī (d. 1025/1616?).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更好地论证 Tawḥīd?关于《沙尔罕圣训》中神属性的哲学讨论
本研究侧重于 al-Taftāzānī 在其《Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid》中对神属性本体论地位的讨论,旨在证明 al-Rāzī(卒于 606/1210)勉强而含糊地提出的神属性自身可能而神必须的公式,其本身就是对阿维森尼关于神智本体论地位的公式的改编。塔夫塔扎尼(al-Taftāzānī,卒于 792/1390)在逊尼派卡拉姆传统中引入了一个更复杂、更先进的版本,该版本得到了更多的认可。)他的改进在后来的注释和超注释传统中引起了相当大的学术兴趣,并由后来的注释家加以完善,而这一重要发展在现代学术中几乎完全被忽视了。本研究还认为,后古典卡拉姆的取向延伸到了接受法拉西法(Falāsifa)提倡的特定公式的地步,以完善逊尼关于神属性本体论地位的理论。因此,逊尼神学有意将以前被拒绝的理论调整到其最独特、最核心的主题之一,即神属性的讨论中。本研究还将表明,方法和结构上的巨大转变表明,逊尼神学,尤其是《沙尔圣训集》注释和超级注释中的逊尼神学,受到了哲学理论的重大影响,在第一次转变之后,由于受到 al-Rāzī 的影响,需要更大规模地采用哲学辩论中形成的词汇和框架。由于 Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid 的注释和超级注释浩如烟海,涵盖的主题也多种多样,目前的研究仅限于 al-Taftāzānī 的 Sharḥ al-ʿAqāid,以及 Musa Khayālī(卒于 862/1457)和 Ramazan Efendi al-Ḥanafī(卒于 1025/1616?)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sophia
Sophia PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink!   Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.
期刊最新文献
Buddhaghosa’s Model of Temporality seen through the Prism of Bergson’s Duration What Kind of ‘God’ do Hindu Arguments for the Divine Show? Five Novel Divine Attributes of Brahman Reconstructing William Lane Craig’s Explanation of Absolute Time Based on Mulla Sadra’s Philosophy Mirabai Seeks God: A Journey of Devotional Love and Longing “Palamism” and “Barlaamism” in the Russian Name-Glorifiers Controversy of the 1910s: The Philosophical Background
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1