The twin peaks of learning neural networks

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine Learning Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/ad524d
Elizaveta Demyanenko, Christoph Feinauer, Enrico M Malatesta, Luca Saglietti
{"title":"The twin peaks of learning neural networks","authors":"Elizaveta Demyanenko, Christoph Feinauer, Enrico M Malatesta, Luca Saglietti","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad524d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent works demonstrated the existence of a double-descent phenomenon for the generalization error of neural networks, where highly overparameterized models escape overfitting and achieve good test performance, at odds with the standard bias-variance trade-off described by statistical learning theory. In the present work, we explore a link between this phenomenon and the increase of complexity and sensitivity of the function represented by neural networks. In particular, we study the Boolean mean dimension (BMD), a metric developed in the context of Boolean function analysis. Focusing on a simple teacher-student setting for the random feature model, we derive a theoretical analysis based on the replica method that yields an interpretable expression for the BMD, in the high dimensional regime where the number of data points, the number of features, and the input size grow to infinity. We find that, as the degree of overparameterization of the network is increased, the BMD reaches an evident peak at the interpolation threshold, in correspondence with the generalization error peak, and then slowly approaches a low asymptotic value. The same phenomenology is then traced in numerical experiments with different model classes and training setups. Moreover, we find empirically that adversarially initialized models tend to show higher BMD values, and that models that are more robust to adversarial attacks exhibit a lower BMD.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":"375 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad524d","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent works demonstrated the existence of a double-descent phenomenon for the generalization error of neural networks, where highly overparameterized models escape overfitting and achieve good test performance, at odds with the standard bias-variance trade-off described by statistical learning theory. In the present work, we explore a link between this phenomenon and the increase of complexity and sensitivity of the function represented by neural networks. In particular, we study the Boolean mean dimension (BMD), a metric developed in the context of Boolean function analysis. Focusing on a simple teacher-student setting for the random feature model, we derive a theoretical analysis based on the replica method that yields an interpretable expression for the BMD, in the high dimensional regime where the number of data points, the number of features, and the input size grow to infinity. We find that, as the degree of overparameterization of the network is increased, the BMD reaches an evident peak at the interpolation threshold, in correspondence with the generalization error peak, and then slowly approaches a low asymptotic value. The same phenomenology is then traced in numerical experiments with different model classes and training setups. Moreover, we find empirically that adversarially initialized models tend to show higher BMD values, and that models that are more robust to adversarial attacks exhibit a lower BMD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习神经网络的双峰
最近的研究表明,神经网络的泛化误差存在双下降现象,即高度过参数化的模型既能摆脱过拟合,又能获得良好的测试性能,这与统计学习理论所描述的标准偏差-方差权衡是不一致的。在本研究中,我们探讨了这一现象与神经网络所代表函数的复杂性和灵敏度增加之间的联系。我们特别研究了布尔平均维度 (BMD),这是一种在布尔函数分析中开发的度量方法。我们以随机特征模型的简单师生设置为重点,推导出了基于复制法的理论分析,在数据点数量、特征数量和输入大小增长到无穷大的高维系统中,该分析得出了布尔平均维度的可解释表达式。我们发现,随着网络过参数化程度的增加,BMD 在插值阈值处达到一个明显的峰值,与泛化误差峰值相对应,然后慢慢接近一个较低的渐近值。在使用不同模型类别和训练设置的数值实验中,我们也发现了同样的现象。此外,我们还根据经验发现,对抗性初始化的模型往往显示出更高的 BMD 值,而对对抗性攻击更具鲁棒性的模型则显示出更低的 BMD 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net. Optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning DiffLense: a conditional diffusion model for super-resolution of gravitational lensing data Equivariant tensor network potentials Masked particle modeling on sets: towards self-supervised high energy physics foundation models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1