Quickcent: a fast and frugal heuristic for harmonic centrality estimation on scale-free networks

IF 3.3 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Computing Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s00607-024-01303-z
Francisco Plana, Andrés Abeliuk, Jorge Pérez
{"title":"Quickcent: a fast and frugal heuristic for harmonic centrality estimation on scale-free networks","authors":"Francisco Plana, Andrés Abeliuk, Jorge Pérez","doi":"10.1007/s00607-024-01303-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We present a simple and quick method to approximate network centrality indexes. Our approach, called <i>QuickCent</i>, is inspired by so-called <i>fast and frugal</i> heuristics, which are heuristics initially proposed to model some human decision and inference processes. The centrality index that we estimate is the <i>harmonic</i> centrality, which is a measure based on shortest-path distances, so infeasible to compute on large networks. We compare <i>QuickCent</i> with known machine learning algorithms on synthetic network datasets, and some empirical networks. Our experiments show that <i>QuickCent</i> can make estimates that are competitive in accuracy with the best alternative methods tested, either on synthetic scale-free networks or empirical networks. QuickCent has the feature of achieving low error variance estimates, even with a small training set. Moreover, <i>QuickCent</i> is comparable in efficiency—accuracy and time cost—to more complex methods. We discuss and provide some insight into how QuickCent exploits the fact that in some networks, such as those generated by preferential attachment, local density measures such as the in-degree, can be a good proxy for the size of the network region to which a node has access, opening up the possibility of approximating expensive indices based on size such as the harmonic centrality. This same fact may explain some evidence we provide that QuickCent would have a superior performance on empirical information networks, such as citations or the internet. Our initial results show that simple heuristics are a promising line of research in the context of network measure estimations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10718,"journal":{"name":"Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-024-01303-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a simple and quick method to approximate network centrality indexes. Our approach, called QuickCent, is inspired by so-called fast and frugal heuristics, which are heuristics initially proposed to model some human decision and inference processes. The centrality index that we estimate is the harmonic centrality, which is a measure based on shortest-path distances, so infeasible to compute on large networks. We compare QuickCent with known machine learning algorithms on synthetic network datasets, and some empirical networks. Our experiments show that QuickCent can make estimates that are competitive in accuracy with the best alternative methods tested, either on synthetic scale-free networks or empirical networks. QuickCent has the feature of achieving low error variance estimates, even with a small training set. Moreover, QuickCent is comparable in efficiency—accuracy and time cost—to more complex methods. We discuss and provide some insight into how QuickCent exploits the fact that in some networks, such as those generated by preferential attachment, local density measures such as the in-degree, can be a good proxy for the size of the network region to which a node has access, opening up the possibility of approximating expensive indices based on size such as the harmonic centrality. This same fact may explain some evidence we provide that QuickCent would have a superior performance on empirical information networks, such as citations or the internet. Our initial results show that simple heuristics are a promising line of research in the context of network measure estimations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quickcent:无标度网络谐波中心性估算的快速节俭启发式方法
我们提出了一种近似网络中心性指数的简单快速方法。我们的方法被称为 QuickCent,其灵感来源于所谓的快速和节俭启发式方法,这些启发式方法最初是为了模拟某些人类决策和推理过程而提出的。我们估算的中心性指数是谐波中心性,它是一种基于最短路径距离的度量,因此在大型网络中计算并不可行。我们在合成网络数据集和一些经验网络上将 QuickCent 与已知的机器学习算法进行了比较。实验结果表明,无论是在合成无标度网络还是在经验网络上,QuickCent 的估计值在准确性上都能与测试过的最佳替代方法相媲美。QuickCent 具有误差方差估计值低的特点,即使训练集很小。此外,QuickCent 在效率--准确性和时间成本方面与更复杂的方法不相上下。我们讨论了 QuickCent 如何利用以下事实并提出了一些见解:在某些网络中,例如由优先附着产生的网络,内度等局部密度度量可以很好地代表节点所能访问的网络区域的大小,从而为基于大小的近似昂贵指数(如谐波中心性)提供了可能性。同样的事实也可以解释我们所提供的一些证据,即 QuickCent 在经验信息网络(如引用或互联网)中具有更优越的性能。我们的初步结果表明,在网络度量估计方面,简单的启发式方法是一个很有前途的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computing
Computing 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Computing publishes original papers, short communications and surveys on all fields of computing. The contributions should be written in English and may be of theoretical or applied nature, the essential criteria are computational relevance and systematic foundation of results.
期刊最新文献
Mapping and just-in-time traffic congestion mitigation for emergency vehicles in smart cities Fog intelligence for energy efficient management in smart street lamps Contextual authentication of users and devices using machine learning Multi-objective service composition optimization problem in IoT for agriculture 4.0 Robust evaluation of GPU compute instances for HPC and AI in the cloud: a TOPSIS approach with sensitivity, bootstrapping, and non-parametric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1