Examining Heart Failure Outcomes Amid Housing Insecurity

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.005
MARTINE WEBB MD , NICHOLAS K. BROWNELL MD , SONYA GABRIELIAN MD , GREGG C. FONAROW MD , BOBACK ZIAEIAN MD, PhD
{"title":"Examining Heart Failure Outcomes Amid Housing Insecurity","authors":"MARTINE WEBB MD ,&nbsp;NICHOLAS K. BROWNELL MD ,&nbsp;SONYA GABRIELIAN MD ,&nbsp;GREGG C. FONAROW MD ,&nbsp;BOBACK ZIAEIAN MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>How housing insecurity might affect patients with heart failure (HF) is not well characterized. Housing insecurity increases risks related to both communicable and noncommunicable diseases. For patients with HF, housing insecurity is likely to increase the risk for worse outcomes and rehospitalizations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>We analyzed hospitalizations due to HF in the United States by using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Readmissions Database to evaluate the impacts of housing insecurity on HF outcomes and hospital use. Individuals were identified as having housing insecurity by using diagnostic International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between patients with HF with and without housing insecurity. An adjusted logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationships between housing insecurity and socioeconomic status on in-hospital mortality. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, patients with HF and without housing insecurity were evaluated for the risk of all-cause and HF-specific readmissions over time. Of the 1,003,270 hospitalizations for HF in the U.S. in 2020, 16,150 were identified as having housing insecurity (1.6%), and 987,120 were identified as having no housing insecurity (98.4%). The median age of patients with housing insecurity who were hospitalized for HF was 57, as compared to 73 in the population with no housing insecurity. A higher proportion of patients in the housing-insecurity group were Black (35% vs 20.1%) or Hispanic (11.1% vs 7.3%). Patients with housing insecurity were more likely to carry a diagnosis of alcohol-use disorder (15.2% vs 3.3%) or substance-use disorder (70.2% vs 17.8%) but were less likely to use tobacco (18.3% vs 28.7%). Patients with housing insecurity were over 4.5 times more likely to have Medicaid (52.4% vs 11.3%). Median length of stay did not differ between patients with housing insecurity vs those without it. Patients with housing insecurity were more likely to discharge against medical advice (11.4% vs 2.03%). After adjusting for patients’ characteristics, housing insecurity was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.92). Housing insecurity was associated with a higher risk of all-cause readmissions at 180 days (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.12–1.14). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of HF-specific readmissions at 180 days (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.998–1.14)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with HF and housing insecurity have distinct demographic characteristics. They are also more likely to be readmitted after their initial hospitalization when compared to those without housing insecurity. Identifying and addressing specific comorbid conditions for patients with housing insecurity who are hospitalized for HF may allow clinicians to provide more focused care, with the goal of preventing morbidity, mortality and unnecessary readmissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 3","pages":"Pages 511-520"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916424002276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

How housing insecurity might affect patients with heart failure (HF) is not well characterized. Housing insecurity increases risks related to both communicable and noncommunicable diseases. For patients with HF, housing insecurity is likely to increase the risk for worse outcomes and rehospitalizations.

Methods and Results

We analyzed hospitalizations due to HF in the United States by using the 2020 National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Readmissions Database to evaluate the impacts of housing insecurity on HF outcomes and hospital use. Individuals were identified as having housing insecurity by using diagnostic International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 codes. Demographics and comorbidities were compared between patients with HF with and without housing insecurity. An adjusted logistic regression was performed to evaluate the relationships between housing insecurity and socioeconomic status on in-hospital mortality. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, patients with HF and without housing insecurity were evaluated for the risk of all-cause and HF-specific readmissions over time. Of the 1,003,270 hospitalizations for HF in the U.S. in 2020, 16,150 were identified as having housing insecurity (1.6%), and 987,120 were identified as having no housing insecurity (98.4%). The median age of patients with housing insecurity who were hospitalized for HF was 57, as compared to 73 in the population with no housing insecurity. A higher proportion of patients in the housing-insecurity group were Black (35% vs 20.1%) or Hispanic (11.1% vs 7.3%). Patients with housing insecurity were more likely to carry a diagnosis of alcohol-use disorder (15.2% vs 3.3%) or substance-use disorder (70.2% vs 17.8%) but were less likely to use tobacco (18.3% vs 28.7%). Patients with housing insecurity were over 4.5 times more likely to have Medicaid (52.4% vs 11.3%). Median length of stay did not differ between patients with housing insecurity vs those without it. Patients with housing insecurity were more likely to discharge against medical advice (11.4% vs 2.03%). After adjusting for patients’ characteristics, housing insecurity was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39–0.92). Housing insecurity was associated with a higher risk of all-cause readmissions at 180 days (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.12–1.14). However, there was no significant difference in the risk of HF-specific readmissions at 180 days (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.998–1.14)

Conclusions

Patients with HF and housing insecurity have distinct demographic characteristics. They are also more likely to be readmitted after their initial hospitalization when compared to those without housing insecurity. Identifying and addressing specific comorbid conditions for patients with housing insecurity who are hospitalized for HF may allow clinicians to provide more focused care, with the goal of preventing morbidity, mortality and unnecessary readmissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在住房无保障的情况下研究心力衰竭的后果
背景:住房不安全会对心力衰竭(HF)患者产生怎样的影响尚未得到很好的描述。住房无保障会增加与传染性和非传染性疾病相关的风险。对于心力衰竭患者来说,住房无保障可能会增加病情恶化和再次住院的风险:我们利用 2020 年全国住院病人样本(NIS)和全国再入院数据库(NRD)分析了美国高血压住院病例,以评估住房无保障对高血压预后和住院使用的影响。使用 ICD-10 诊断代码确定个人是否存在住房不安全问题。对住房无保障和住房无保障的高频患者的人口统计学和合并症进行了比较。为评估住房无保障和社会经济地位与院内死亡率之间的关系,进行了调整后的逻辑回归。使用 Cox 比例危险模型,评估了住房无保障和住房无保障的高血压患者随着时间推移发生全因再住院和高血压特异性再住院的风险。2020 年,美国有 1,003,270 人因高血压住院,其中 16,150 人被认定为住房无保障(1.6%),987,120 人被认定为无住房保障(98.4%)。因住房无保障而住院治疗的高血压患者的中位年龄为 57 岁,而无住房无保障人群的中位年龄为 73 岁。住房无保障组中黑人(35% 对 20.1%)或西班牙裔(11.1% 对 7.3%)患者的比例更高。住房无保障患者更有可能被诊断为酒精使用障碍(15.2% 对 3.3%)或药物使用障碍(70.2% 对 17.8%),但使用烟草的可能性较小(18.3% 对 28.7%)。住房无保障的患者享受医疗补助的可能性是其他患者的 4.5 倍(52.4% 对 11.3%)。住房无保障患者与无住房保障患者的住院时间中位数没有差异。住房无保障的患者更有可能按照医嘱出院(11.4% 对 2.03%)。对患者特征进行调整后,住房无保障与较低的院内死亡率相关(OR 0.60,95% CI 0.39 - 0.92)。住房不安全与 180 天内全因再入院风险较高有关(HR 1.13,95% CI 1.12 - 1.14)。然而,180 天后高血压特异性再入院风险没有明显差异(HR 1.07,95% CI 0.998 - 1.14):心房颤动和住房不安全患者具有不同的人口统计学特征。与住房无保障的患者相比,他们在首次住院后再次入院的可能性更大。识别并解决因高血压住院的住房无保障患者的特定合并症,可使临床医生提供更有针对性的护理,从而达到预防发病、死亡和不必要的再入院的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial risk assessment for heart transplantation: evaluating for bias and impact on posttransplant outcomes. Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices. Patient Focus: Teamwork to make the heart work: An explanation of "Impact of Embedded Interdisciplinary Heart Failure Teams on Achieving Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Within Community-Based Cardiology Practices''. Activation of neutrophil extracellular trap formation in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Weighing the Benefits of Wearable Devices in Heart Failure Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1