Psychosocial Risk Assessment for Heart Transplantation: Evaluating for Bias and Impact on Post-transplant Outcomes

IF 8.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.016
YOAV HAMMER MD , KEERTHI GONDI MD , JOHN LARSON MD , MONICA M. COLVIN MD, MS , THOMAS M. CASCINO MD, MSc , PHILIPPA CLARKE PhD , RUTH HALBEN MSW , MATHEOS YOSEF PhD , SHOKOUFEH KHALATBARI MS , KEITH D. AARONSON MD, PhD
{"title":"Psychosocial Risk Assessment for Heart Transplantation: Evaluating for Bias and Impact on Post-transplant Outcomes","authors":"YOAV HAMMER MD ,&nbsp;KEERTHI GONDI MD ,&nbsp;JOHN LARSON MD ,&nbsp;MONICA M. COLVIN MD, MS ,&nbsp;THOMAS M. CASCINO MD, MSc ,&nbsp;PHILIPPA CLARKE PhD ,&nbsp;RUTH HALBEN MSW ,&nbsp;MATHEOS YOSEF PhD ,&nbsp;SHOKOUFEH KHALATBARI MS ,&nbsp;KEITH D. AARONSON MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pretransplant psychosocial risk (PSR) assessment is subjective, so we investigated potential biases and the relationship between assessed PSR and post-transplant outcomes at our heart transplant center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Between 05/2004 and 01/2021, 479 heart transplant (HT) recipients had a pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation, at which a social worker collected information about 25 characteristics and categorized the candidate's PSR for post-transplant death. Relationships between PSR and post-transplant outcomes (death, hospitalization and rejection) were evaluated. Possible biases in PSR evaluation were examined by assessing the independent relationships among race, sex, psychosocial characteristics, additional socioeconomic characteristics imputed from U.S. census data, and the PSR categorization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Psychosocial risk was categorized as low (399), medium (57) or high (23). Medium- or high-risk patients were younger and more likely to have psychosocial risk factors and live in less affluent neighborhoods. Race and sex were not found to influence the PSR categorization (both <em>P</em> = 0.4). Neighborhood affluence score (OR 0.30; <em>P</em> = 0.009) and family/social support (OR 500; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) were strongly and independently associated with PSR categorization; less affluent patients and those without family/social support were more likely to be classified as being at medium or high risk. Medium- or high-risk categorization was not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates after HT (<em>P</em> = 0.5 and 0.3, respectively), but it was associated with increased risk for experiencing rejection (HR 1.7, CI 1.02–2.90).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Medium or high PSR was associated with a greater risk of rejection but not of hospitalization or death. There was no indication of race or sex bias in our program's preoperative psychosocial evaluations, but patients’ affluence may have influenced decision making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071916425001411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pretransplant psychosocial risk (PSR) assessment is subjective, so we investigated potential biases and the relationship between assessed PSR and post-transplant outcomes at our heart transplant center.

Methods

Between 05/2004 and 01/2021, 479 heart transplant (HT) recipients had a pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation, at which a social worker collected information about 25 characteristics and categorized the candidate's PSR for post-transplant death. Relationships between PSR and post-transplant outcomes (death, hospitalization and rejection) were evaluated. Possible biases in PSR evaluation were examined by assessing the independent relationships among race, sex, psychosocial characteristics, additional socioeconomic characteristics imputed from U.S. census data, and the PSR categorization.

Results

Psychosocial risk was categorized as low (399), medium (57) or high (23). Medium- or high-risk patients were younger and more likely to have psychosocial risk factors and live in less affluent neighborhoods. Race and sex were not found to influence the PSR categorization (both P = 0.4). Neighborhood affluence score (OR 0.30; P = 0.009) and family/social support (OR 500; P < 0.001) were strongly and independently associated with PSR categorization; less affluent patients and those without family/social support were more likely to be classified as being at medium or high risk. Medium- or high-risk categorization was not associated with increased mortality or hospitalization rates after HT (P = 0.5 and 0.3, respectively), but it was associated with increased risk for experiencing rejection (HR 1.7, CI 1.02–2.90).

Conclusion

Medium or high PSR was associated with a greater risk of rejection but not of hospitalization or death. There was no indication of race or sex bias in our program's preoperative psychosocial evaluations, but patients’ affluence may have influenced decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏移植的社会心理风险评估:评估偏倚和对移植后结果的影响。
背景:由于移植前社会心理风险(PSR)评估是主观的,我们调查了潜在的偏差以及在我们的心脏移植中心评估的PSR与移植后结果之间的关系。方法:479名心脏移植(HT)受者(2004年5月- 2021年1月)接受了移植前社会心理评估,社会工作者收集了25项特征信息,并将候选者的PSR分类为移植后死亡。评估PSR与移植后结局(死亡、住院和排斥)之间的关系。通过评估种族、性别、心理社会特征、来自美国人口普查数据的附加社会经济特征和PSR分类之间的独立关系,研究了PSR评估中可能存在的偏差。结果:心理社会风险分为低(399)、中(57)和高(23)。中等或高风险患者更年轻,更有可能有社会心理风险因素,生活在不太富裕的社区。种族和性别未发现影响PSR分类(均p=0.4)。社区富裕评分(OR 0.30, p=0.009)和家庭/社会支持(OR 500, p)。结论:中等或较高的PSR与更大的排斥风险相关,但与住院或死亡风险无关。在我们项目的术前社会心理评估中没有种族或性别偏见的迹象,但患者的富裕程度可能影响了决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Incentivizing a Safety Net Cardiac Recovery Pathway via the Heart Transplant Allocation System. Remote Patient Care of Patients with Heart Failure A Focused Review on the HearLogic-System. Temporal Dynamics of Clinical Benefit in DIGIT-HF: The Impact of Treatment Persistence. Microaxial Flow Pump Use in Different Phenotypes of Cardiogenic Shock - a Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. The Association of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Scores and Patient Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1