Effectiveness of Participatory Research Interventions on Obesity and Obesity-Related Behaviors in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae067
Judit Queral, Annemieke Wargers, Elisabet Llauradó, Wilma Jansen, Rosa Solà, Lucia Tarro, Famke J M Mölenberg
{"title":"Effectiveness of Participatory Research Interventions on Obesity and Obesity-Related Behaviors in Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Judit Queral, Annemieke Wargers, Elisabet Llauradó, Wilma Jansen, Rosa Solà, Lucia Tarro, Famke J M Mölenberg","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Adolescence is an optimal period to promote healthy lifestyles because behavior patterns are established in this stage. It has been suggested that engaging youth increases the effectiveness of interventions, but an overview is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of participatory research (PR) interventions, where adolescents (11-18 years old) from high-income countries had a significant role in the intervention development and/or delivery, compared with no (PR) intervention control groups on obesity-related outcomes and healthy lifestyle behaviors (HLBs).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Eight databases (Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar were searched from 1990 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs (in English).</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Two researchers independently performed the data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Data analysis: </strong>Sixteen studies were included and outcomes have been narratively described. Seven studies evaluated youth-led interventions, 3 studies evaluated co-created interventions, and 6 studies evaluated the combination of both. Six studies focused on physical activity (PA), 2 on nutrition, and 8 on a combination of PA, nutrition, and/or obesity-related outcomes. Ten studies presented at least 1 significant effect on PA, nutrition, or obesity-related outcomes in favor of the intervention group. Additionally, 12 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis. Whereas a small desired effect was found for fruit consumption, a small undesired effect was found for vegetable consumption. The pooled analysis found no significant effects on moderate-vigorous PA, total PA, and PA self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found some evidence that youth empowerment in research may have positive effects on obesity-related HLBs, specifically an increased fruit consumption. However, the overall evidence was inconclusive due to limited studies and the heterogeneity of the studies included. This overview may guide future public health interventions that aim to engage and empower adolescents.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration Nº CRD42021254135.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae067","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Adolescence is an optimal period to promote healthy lifestyles because behavior patterns are established in this stage. It has been suggested that engaging youth increases the effectiveness of interventions, but an overview is lacking.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of participatory research (PR) interventions, where adolescents (11-18 years old) from high-income countries had a significant role in the intervention development and/or delivery, compared with no (PR) intervention control groups on obesity-related outcomes and healthy lifestyle behaviors (HLBs).

Data sources: Eight databases (Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar were searched from 1990 to 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs (in English).

Data extraction: Two researchers independently performed the data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment.

Data analysis: Sixteen studies were included and outcomes have been narratively described. Seven studies evaluated youth-led interventions, 3 studies evaluated co-created interventions, and 6 studies evaluated the combination of both. Six studies focused on physical activity (PA), 2 on nutrition, and 8 on a combination of PA, nutrition, and/or obesity-related outcomes. Ten studies presented at least 1 significant effect on PA, nutrition, or obesity-related outcomes in favor of the intervention group. Additionally, 12 studies were pooled in a meta-analysis. Whereas a small desired effect was found for fruit consumption, a small undesired effect was found for vegetable consumption. The pooled analysis found no significant effects on moderate-vigorous PA, total PA, and PA self-efficacy.

Conclusion: We found some evidence that youth empowerment in research may have positive effects on obesity-related HLBs, specifically an increased fruit consumption. However, the overall evidence was inconclusive due to limited studies and the heterogeneity of the studies included. This overview may guide future public health interventions that aim to engage and empower adolescents.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration Nº CRD42021254135.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与式研究干预对青少年肥胖及肥胖相关行为的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:青春期是推广健康生活方式的最佳时期,因为行为模式在这一阶段已经形成。有观点认为,让青少年参与其中可提高干预措施的效果,但目前尚缺乏相关概述:本研究旨在评估参与式研究(PR)干预措施的效果,与无参与式研究(PR)干预措施的对照组相比,高收入国家的青少年(11-18 岁)在干预措施的制定和/或实施中发挥了重要作用,这些干预措施对肥胖相关结果和健康生活方式行为(HLBs)的影响:从 1990 年到 2024 年,我们检索了八个数据库(Embase、Medline ALL、Web of Science Core Collection、PsycINFO、ERIC、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)和谷歌学术(Google Scholar)中的随机对照试验(RCT)和非 RCT(英文)数据:两名研究人员独立进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估:数据分析:共纳入 16 项研究,并对研究结果进行了叙述性描述。7 项研究评估了青少年主导的干预措施,3 项研究评估了共同创建的干预措施,6 项研究评估了两者的结合。6 项研究关注体育锻炼(PA),2 项研究关注营养,8 项研究关注体育锻炼、营养和/或肥胖相关结果的组合。有 10 项研究表明,干预组在体育锻炼、营养或肥胖相关结果方面至少有一项显着效果。此外,还对 12 项研究进行了荟萃分析。在水果消费方面发现了微小的预期效果,而在蔬菜消费方面则发现了微小的非预期效果。汇总分析发现,对中等-剧烈运动、总运动量和运动自我效能没有明显影响:我们发现一些证据表明,在研究中增强青少年的能力可能会对与肥胖相关的 HLBs 产生积极影响,特别是增加水果的食用量。然而,由于研究有限且所纳入研究的异质性,总体证据并不确定。本综述可为未来旨在吸引青少年参与并增强其能力的公共卫生干预措施提供指导:系统综述注册:PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021254135。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Beneficial Effects of Berry Extracts on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Animal Models. Health Benefits From Diets High in Salicylates May Arise From Improved Utilization of Dietary Copper. The Longitudinal Evidence on Social Ties and Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Aging Adults: A Systematic Review. The psychological basis of hunger and its dysfunctions. Correction to: Menatetrenone (Vitamin K2) and Bone Quality in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1