Conceptualizing Student Experiences of Psychological Safety in Simulation: A Grounded Theory Study.

Carol T Kostovich, Lee A Schmidt, Kimberly J Oosterhouse
{"title":"Conceptualizing Student Experiences of Psychological Safety in Simulation: A Grounded Theory Study.","authors":"Carol T Kostovich, Lee A Schmidt, Kimberly J Oosterhouse","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240505-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based learning activities have become more prevalent in prelicensure nursing curricula. When following the Simulation Standards of Best Practice, optimal learning conditions can be achieved, including the creation of a psychologically safe learning environment. Yet, the process of how students come to feel psychologically safe during a simulation experience remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A grounded theory approach was used to conceptualize the basic social process by which nursing students feel psychologically safe during a simulation learning experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six categories emerged from the data: (1) being nervous; (2) having a good instructor; (3) learning; (4) coming together; (5) being in debriefing; and (6) leaving on a positive note. The core category of putting myself out there emerged as the basic social process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The social process of psychological safety in simulation develops within nursing students as the result of interplay among several dimensions of the learning experience. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(7):427-433.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94241,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of nursing education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of nursing education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240505-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based learning activities have become more prevalent in prelicensure nursing curricula. When following the Simulation Standards of Best Practice, optimal learning conditions can be achieved, including the creation of a psychologically safe learning environment. Yet, the process of how students come to feel psychologically safe during a simulation experience remains unknown.

Method: A grounded theory approach was used to conceptualize the basic social process by which nursing students feel psychologically safe during a simulation learning experience.

Results: Six categories emerged from the data: (1) being nervous; (2) having a good instructor; (3) learning; (4) coming together; (5) being in debriefing; and (6) leaving on a positive note. The core category of putting myself out there emerged as the basic social process.

Conclusion: The social process of psychological safety in simulation develops within nursing students as the result of interplay among several dimensions of the learning experience. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(7):427-433.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟教学中学生心理安全体验的概念化:基础理论研究。
背景:基于模拟的学习活动在执照前护理课程中越来越普遍。按照《模拟最佳实践标准》,可以实现最佳的学习条件,包括创造心理安全的学习环境。然而,学生如何在模拟体验中获得心理安全感的过程仍是未知数:方法:采用基础理论方法,对护生在模拟学习体验中感受心理安全的基本社会过程进行概念化:从数据中得出了六个类别:(1) 紧张;(2) 有一个好的指导老师;(3) 学习;(4) 团结一致;(5) 进行汇报;(6) 以积极的态度离开。把自己放在那里 "这一核心类别成为基本的社会过程:结论:护理专业学生在模拟学习中形成心理安全的社会过程,是学习体验几个方面相互作用的结果。[护理教育杂志,2024;63(7):427-433]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fulbright as Opportunity for U.S. Nursing Educators and International Nursing Schools. Outcomes of Concept-Based Curricula: An Integrative Review. Meeting Quality Improvement Learning Outcomes: Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycle. A Multimodal Learning Approach in an Undergraduate Palliative Care Nursing Unit of Study. Adopting Optimal Statistical Practices: Reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1