An Intermittent Fasting Intervention for Black Adults Can Be Feasibly Implemented in Black Churches: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jand.2024.07.003
Karen H Kim Yeary, Detric Johnson, Narseary Harris, Han Yu, Frances G Saad-Harfouche, Cassy Dauphin, Elizabeth DiCarlo, Tessa Flores, Song Yao, Krista Varady, Li Tang
{"title":"An Intermittent Fasting Intervention for Black Adults Can Be Feasibly Implemented in Black Churches: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.","authors":"Karen H Kim Yeary, Detric Johnson, Narseary Harris, Han Yu, Frances G Saad-Harfouche, Cassy Dauphin, Elizabeth DiCarlo, Tessa Flores, Song Yao, Krista Varady, Li Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive lifestyle interventions, including modest reductions in daily caloric intake (ie, continuous calorie energy reduction [CER]), are recommended by US national professional health organizations (eg, American Heart Association). However, they are less effective in Black communities. A burgeoning literature has reported the promise of intermittent fasting (IF) as an alternative strategy for weight loss. However, IF studies have been conducted with White participants predominately and provided participant resources not readily available in real-world situations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Weight-loss and weight-related outcomes of a scalable (ie, able to be widely disseminated and implemented) IF intervention developed with and for Black adults were compared with a CER intervention for the purpose of determining IF's feasibility (ie, initial effectiveness, adherence, and acceptance) in a Black community.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cluster randomized controlled pilot study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>A total of 42 Black adults with a body mass index (calculated as kg / m<sup>2</sup>) ≥25 were recruited from 5 Black churches (3 IF and 2 CER) in Western New York State from September 2021 to May 2022. Participants were free of medical conditions that might have contraindicated participation in a weight-reduction program and other factors that might affect weight loss.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Community health workers delivered the 6-month, 16-session, faith-based IF and CER interventions.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was feasibility, consisting of initial effectiveness on body weight (ie, percent body weight lost from baseline to 6-month follow-up), adherence, and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models accounting for within-church clustering were used. A baseline covariate corresponding to the outcome variable was included in the model. Intent-to-treat analysis was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was statistically significant weight loss within both arms (IF: -3.5 kg; 95% CI -6 to -0.9 kg, CER: -2.9 kg; 95% CI -5.1 to -0.8 kg) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Compared with CER, IF led to significantly lower daily energy intake (414.2 kcal; 95% CI 55.2 to 773.2 kcal) and fat intake (16.1 g; 95% CI 2.4 to 29.8 g). IF may result in lower fruit and vegetable intake (-103.2 g; 95% CI -200.9 to -5.5 g) and fiber intake -5.4 g; 95% CI -8.7 to -2 g) compared with CER. Participants in the IF arm completed a mean (SE) of 3.8 (1.4) more self-monitoring booklets compared with those in the CER arm (P = .02). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An IF intervention developed with and for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches. Larger studies need to be conducted to ascertain the extent IF can serve as a viable weight-loss alternative to CER interventions in Black communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":"172-187.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2024.07.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive lifestyle interventions, including modest reductions in daily caloric intake (ie, continuous calorie energy reduction [CER]), are recommended by US national professional health organizations (eg, American Heart Association). However, they are less effective in Black communities. A burgeoning literature has reported the promise of intermittent fasting (IF) as an alternative strategy for weight loss. However, IF studies have been conducted with White participants predominately and provided participant resources not readily available in real-world situations.

Objective: Weight-loss and weight-related outcomes of a scalable (ie, able to be widely disseminated and implemented) IF intervention developed with and for Black adults were compared with a CER intervention for the purpose of determining IF's feasibility (ie, initial effectiveness, adherence, and acceptance) in a Black community.

Design: A cluster randomized controlled pilot study was conducted.

Participants/setting: A total of 42 Black adults with a body mass index (calculated as kg / m2) ≥25 were recruited from 5 Black churches (3 IF and 2 CER) in Western New York State from September 2021 to May 2022. Participants were free of medical conditions that might have contraindicated participation in a weight-reduction program and other factors that might affect weight loss.

Interventions: Community health workers delivered the 6-month, 16-session, faith-based IF and CER interventions.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was feasibility, consisting of initial effectiveness on body weight (ie, percent body weight lost from baseline to 6-month follow-up), adherence, and acceptability.

Statistical analyses performed: Descriptive statistics and linear mixed models accounting for within-church clustering were used. A baseline covariate corresponding to the outcome variable was included in the model. Intent-to-treat analysis was used.

Results: There was statistically significant weight loss within both arms (IF: -3.5 kg; 95% CI -6 to -0.9 kg, CER: -2.9 kg; 95% CI -5.1 to -0.8 kg) from baseline to 6-month follow-up. Compared with CER, IF led to significantly lower daily energy intake (414.2 kcal; 95% CI 55.2 to 773.2 kcal) and fat intake (16.1 g; 95% CI 2.4 to 29.8 g). IF may result in lower fruit and vegetable intake (-103.2 g; 95% CI -200.9 to -5.5 g) and fiber intake -5.4 g; 95% CI -8.7 to -2 g) compared with CER. Participants in the IF arm completed a mean (SE) of 3.8 (1.4) more self-monitoring booklets compared with those in the CER arm (P = .02). Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the program.

Conclusions: An IF intervention developed with and for Black adults can be feasibly implemented in Black churches. Larger studies need to be conducted to ascertain the extent IF can serve as a viable weight-loss alternative to CER interventions in Black communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对黑人成年人的间歇性禁食干预可以在黑人教堂中实施:集群随机对照试点研究。
背景:美国国家专业健康组织(如美国心脏协会)建议采取强化生活方式干预措施,包括适度减少每日卡路里摄入量(即持续减少卡路里能量(CER))。然而,这些方法在黑人社区的效果较差。大量文献报道了间歇性禁食(IF)作为减肥替代策略的前景。然而,间歇性禁食研究主要是针对白人参与者进行的,为参与者提供的资源在现实世界中并不容易获得:目的:将一项针对黑人成年人开发的可扩展(能够广泛传播和实施)中频干预措施的减肥效果和体重相关结果与 CER 干预措施进行比较,以确定中频在黑人社区的可行性(初始效果、坚持性和接受度):设计:进行分组随机对照试验研究:从 2021 年 9 月到 2022 年 5 月,从纽约州西部的 5 个黑人教堂(3 个 IF 教堂,2 个 CER 教堂)共招募了 42 名体重指数≥25 的黑人成年人。参与者不存在可能妨碍参加减重计划的疾病,也不存在可能影响减重的其他因素:干预措施:社区卫生工作者提供为期 6 个月、共 16 节课的基于信仰的 IF 和 CER 干预措施:主要结果是可行性,包括对体重的初步效果(从基线到 6 个月随访期间体重减轻的百分比)、依从性和可接受性:采用了描述性统计和线性混合模型,并考虑了教会内部的聚类。模型中包括与结果变量相对应的基线协变量。采用意向治疗分析:从基线到 6 个月的随访结果显示,两组的体重均有明显下降[IF:-3.5 (-6, -0.9)公斤];[CER:-2.9 (-5.1, -0.8)公斤]。与 CER 相比,IF 可显著降低每日能量摄入量 [414.2 (55.2, 773.2) 千卡] 和脂肪摄入量 [16.1 (2.4, 29.8) 克]。与 CER 相比,IF 可能会导致水果和蔬菜摄入量[-103.2 (-200.9, -5.5) g]和纤维摄入量[-5.4 (-8.7, -2)]降低。与 CER 组相比,IF 组的参与者多完成了 3.8 (1.4) 本自我监测手册(P=0.02)。参与者对该计划的满意度很高:为黑人成年人开发的 IF 干预方案可以在黑人教堂中实施。需要进行更大规模的研究,以确定在黑人社区,IF在多大程度上可以作为CER干预的可行减肥替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
649
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.
期刊最新文献
Measured and Predicted Resting Metabolic Rate of Dutch and Norwegian Paralympic Athletes. Socioeconomic Characteristics and the Home Food Environment Are Associated With Feeding Healthful and Discretionary Foods During the First Year of Life in the Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study. A Narrative Review of Intermittent Fasting With Exercise. An Intermittent Fasting Intervention for Black Adults Can Be Feasibly Implemented in Black Churches: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Are People Consuming the Diets They Say They Are? Self-Reported vs Estimated Adherence to Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2018.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1