Is social media B2B engagement driven by impression management strategies? Understanding corporate-driven versus individual-driven LinkedIn profiles

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Industrial Marketing Management Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.07.003
Anastasia Stathopoulou , Maria Kreuzer , Caroline Frisenberg
{"title":"Is social media B2B engagement driven by impression management strategies? Understanding corporate-driven versus individual-driven LinkedIn profiles","authors":"Anastasia Stathopoulou ,&nbsp;Maria Kreuzer ,&nbsp;Caroline Frisenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Professional social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, allow individuals to build their own personal brand with the aim to foster B2B engagement. Individuals can project both individual- and corporate-driven characteristics through LinkedIn, to create favorable impressions management (IM) strategies and attract viewers engagement. This study aims first to understand the difference between individual- versus corporate-driven elements of LinkedIn profiles. Then, using the IM theory, this paper explores the different perceptions formed by potential business partners on these elements which can lead to B2B social media engagement. A content analysis of 130 LinkedIn profiles, followed by 20 in-depth interviews with business professionals, show that perceptions are different between the individual- versus the corporate-driven profiles and these perceptions together with the IM strategies are not static, showing that IM strategies need to be assessed in combinations and over difference phases. Individual-driven profile elements seem to project the most favorable perceptions to foster B2B engagement, leaving the corporate-driven elements to only compliment what is described as the ‘ideal’ profile for B2B engagement. The findings provide valuable insights to different business partners who want to initiate contact and engage with business professionals on social media in a B2B context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51345,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Marketing Management","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 55-73"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Marketing Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019850124001056","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional social media platforms, such as LinkedIn, allow individuals to build their own personal brand with the aim to foster B2B engagement. Individuals can project both individual- and corporate-driven characteristics through LinkedIn, to create favorable impressions management (IM) strategies and attract viewers engagement. This study aims first to understand the difference between individual- versus corporate-driven elements of LinkedIn profiles. Then, using the IM theory, this paper explores the different perceptions formed by potential business partners on these elements which can lead to B2B social media engagement. A content analysis of 130 LinkedIn profiles, followed by 20 in-depth interviews with business professionals, show that perceptions are different between the individual- versus the corporate-driven profiles and these perceptions together with the IM strategies are not static, showing that IM strategies need to be assessed in combinations and over difference phases. Individual-driven profile elements seem to project the most favorable perceptions to foster B2B engagement, leaving the corporate-driven elements to only compliment what is described as the ‘ideal’ profile for B2B engagement. The findings provide valuable insights to different business partners who want to initiate contact and engage with business professionals on social media in a B2B context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社交媒体 B2B 参与度是由印象管理策略驱动的吗?了解企业驱动的 LinkedIn 简介和个人驱动的 LinkedIn 简介
LinkedIn 等专业社交媒体平台允许个人建立自己的个人品牌,以促进 B2B 参与。个人可以通过LinkedIn投射个人和企业驱动的特征,创造有利的印象管理(IM)策略,吸引观众参与。本研究旨在首先了解 LinkedIn 个人档案中由个人驱动的元素与由企业驱动的元素之间的区别。然后,本文利用 IM 理论,探讨潜在商业伙伴对这些元素形成的不同看法,这些看法可能会导致 B2B 社交媒体的参与。通过对130份LinkedIn档案的内容分析,以及对20位商业专业人士的深入访谈,我们发现,个人驱动型档案和企业驱动型档案的认知是不同的,而且这些认知和即时信息策略也不是一成不变的,这表明即时信息策略需要结合不同阶段的情况进行评估。个人驱动的特征要素似乎对促进 B2B 参与最有利,而企业驱动的要素则只能对 B2B 参与的 "理想 "特征起到补充作用。这些发现为希望在 B2B 环境中通过社交媒体与商务人士建立联系和接触的不同业务合作伙伴提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
20.40%
发文量
255
期刊介绍: Industrial Marketing Management delivers theoretical, empirical, and case-based research tailored to the requirements of marketing scholars and practitioners engaged in industrial and business-to-business markets. With an editorial review board comprising prominent international scholars and practitioners, the journal ensures a harmonious blend of theory and practical applications in all articles. Scholars from North America, Europe, Australia/New Zealand, Asia, and various global regions contribute the latest findings to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of industrial markets. This holistic approach keeps readers informed with the most timely data and contemporary insights essential for informed marketing decisions and strategies in global industrial and business-to-business markets.
期刊最新文献
Sustainable entrepreneurship: How do contextual factors play a role? How marketing and sales use digital tools for innovation ideation The value of congruence in social exchanges: A dyadic trust perspective on servitization The role of innovation capabilities upgradation and digitalization in value co-creation and PSS innovation performance Collaborative problemistic search capability and digital innovation: The moderating effects of IT capability and legal development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1