Taking Science Fiction seriously: Unveiling its relationship with employee’s Innovative Work Behavior

IF 11.1 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103071
Francesca Zoccarato , Emanuele Lettieri , Giovanni Radaelli , Antonio Ghezzi , Giovanni Toletti
{"title":"Taking Science Fiction seriously: Unveiling its relationship with employee’s Innovative Work Behavior","authors":"Francesca Zoccarato ,&nbsp;Emanuele Lettieri ,&nbsp;Giovanni Radaelli ,&nbsp;Antonio Ghezzi ,&nbsp;Giovanni Toletti","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While existing literature acknowledges the role of science fiction in foreseeing technological advancements, a notable gap persists in understanding the underlying factors that drive or hinder individuals from the intention to generate and promote ideas gathered through science fiction. Our research model aims to shed novel light on what factors influence employees’ propensity to generate and promote ideas inspired by science fiction, through the lenses of institutional theory. Purposefully, we frame science fiction methodologies inside the Innovative Work Behavior discourse, as science fiction could be a fruitful tool to generate and promote ideas, and we investigate the interplay of rational and institutional influences on such behaviors. The findings provide valuable insights that can be leveraged to design and implement effective methodologies within organizational settings. Our study, based on data from 480 employees, employs Structural Equation Modeling to reveal the pivotal role of normative influence in idea generation, while idea promotion exhibits a robust association with cultural-cognitive influence, pinpointing the dual phase of science fiction methodologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001214/pdfft?md5=4ae11d46a94032215b58af5bc0af43ec&pid=1-s2.0-S0166497224001214-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001214","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While existing literature acknowledges the role of science fiction in foreseeing technological advancements, a notable gap persists in understanding the underlying factors that drive or hinder individuals from the intention to generate and promote ideas gathered through science fiction. Our research model aims to shed novel light on what factors influence employees’ propensity to generate and promote ideas inspired by science fiction, through the lenses of institutional theory. Purposefully, we frame science fiction methodologies inside the Innovative Work Behavior discourse, as science fiction could be a fruitful tool to generate and promote ideas, and we investigate the interplay of rational and institutional influences on such behaviors. The findings provide valuable insights that can be leveraged to design and implement effective methodologies within organizational settings. Our study, based on data from 480 employees, employs Structural Equation Modeling to reveal the pivotal role of normative influence in idea generation, while idea promotion exhibits a robust association with cultural-cognitive influence, pinpointing the dual phase of science fiction methodologies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认真对待科幻小说:揭示科幻小说与员工创新工作行为的关系
虽然现有文献承认科幻小说在预见技术进步方面的作用,但在理解推动或阻碍个人产生和推广通过科幻小说收集到的想法的潜在因素方面仍存在明显差距。我们的研究模型旨在通过制度理论的视角,揭示哪些因素会影响员工产生和推广由科幻小说激发的想法的倾向。我们有目的地将科幻小说方法论纳入创新工作行为论述,因为科幻小说可能是产生和推广创意的一个富有成效的工具,我们还研究了理性和制度对此类行为的相互影响。研究结果提供了宝贵的见解,可用于在组织环境中设计和实施有效的方法。我们的研究以 480 名员工的数据为基础,采用结构方程模型揭示了规范性影响在创意产生中的关键作用,而创意推广则与文化-认知影响密切相关,从而精确定位了科幻小说方法论的双重阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Are consumers willing to pay more for green innovations? Insights from the air transport industry Does customer concentration matter in business model value: Threshold effects of carbon emissions and dynamic capabilities? Divergent trajectories on frontier innovations: A comparison of international venture capital-invested ventures between China and the United States Editorial Board Measuring process innovation outputs and understanding their implications for firms and workers: Evidence from Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1