From new venture idea to viable business: Breakthrough innovation capability in established firms

IF 10.9 1区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Technovation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103186
Erwin Danneels , Gina Colarelli-O'Connor
{"title":"From new venture idea to viable business: Breakthrough innovation capability in established firms","authors":"Erwin Danneels ,&nbsp;Gina Colarelli-O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breakthrough innovation (BI) is critical to the long-term growth and renewal of large established firms. Therefore, these firms could benefit greatly from possessing a capability for breakthrough innovation, the ability to achieve breakthrough innovation intentionally, repeatedly, and reliably. While previous research has provided extensive insights into facilitators of breakthrough innovation, we still know little about what firms and their managers do to act upon those. In particular, we lack detailed understanding of the specific activities that jointly constitute a BI capability. Because we are able to build on an extensive (but fragmented and incomplete) literature on BI, we use the extended case method to “extend” – that is elaborate – existing theory. We iterate between interview data on a large set of incumbent firms and related literatures on exploitation-exploration, uncertainty, and innovation more generally to build a detailed and integrative framework of practices used to achieve BI – what managers actually do, with what goals, and assessed by which metrics. We find these practices in turn underpin three sub-competences: conceptualization, experimentation, and scaling (CES), which together constitute a BI capability. Conceptualization is the generation, elaboration, and articulation of business concepts, experimentation is exploring and validating these concepts, and scaling is growing a viable business. Taking a Practice-Based View, we present fine-grained insights into distinct goals, metrics, and practices that support these competences, and we explain how these work together.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49444,"journal":{"name":"Technovation","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 103186"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497225000185","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breakthrough innovation (BI) is critical to the long-term growth and renewal of large established firms. Therefore, these firms could benefit greatly from possessing a capability for breakthrough innovation, the ability to achieve breakthrough innovation intentionally, repeatedly, and reliably. While previous research has provided extensive insights into facilitators of breakthrough innovation, we still know little about what firms and their managers do to act upon those. In particular, we lack detailed understanding of the specific activities that jointly constitute a BI capability. Because we are able to build on an extensive (but fragmented and incomplete) literature on BI, we use the extended case method to “extend” – that is elaborate – existing theory. We iterate between interview data on a large set of incumbent firms and related literatures on exploitation-exploration, uncertainty, and innovation more generally to build a detailed and integrative framework of practices used to achieve BI – what managers actually do, with what goals, and assessed by which metrics. We find these practices in turn underpin three sub-competences: conceptualization, experimentation, and scaling (CES), which together constitute a BI capability. Conceptualization is the generation, elaboration, and articulation of business concepts, experimentation is exploring and validating these concepts, and scaling is growing a viable business. Taking a Practice-Based View, we present fine-grained insights into distinct goals, metrics, and practices that support these competences, and we explain how these work together.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从新的创业想法到可行的业务:成熟企业的突破性创新能力
突破性创新(BI)对大型老牌企业的长期增长和更新至关重要。因此,拥有突破性创新能力,即有意识地、反复地、可靠地实现突破性创新的能力,可以使这些企业受益匪浅。虽然之前的研究已经对突破性创新的促进因素提供了广泛的见解,但我们对企业及其管理者如何根据这些因素采取行动知之甚少。特别是,我们缺乏对共同构成BI能力的特定活动的详细理解。因为我们能够建立在广泛的(但零散和不完整的)BI文献的基础上,所以我们使用扩展案例方法来“扩展”——也就是详细阐述——现有的理论。我们在大量现有公司的访谈数据和有关开发-探索、不确定性和创新的相关文献之间进行迭代,以建立一个用于实现BI的详细和综合的实践框架——经理们实际做了什么,有什么目标,并通过哪些指标进行评估。我们发现这些实践反过来支撑了三个子能力:概念化、实验和扩展(CES),它们共同构成了BI能力。概念化是业务概念的生成、细化和表达,实验是探索和验证这些概念,扩展是发展一个可行的业务。采用基于实践的视图,我们呈现了对支持这些能力的不同目标、度量标准和实践的细粒度洞察,并解释了它们是如何协同工作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technovation
Technovation 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
11.20%
发文量
208
审稿时长
91 days
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary journal Technovation covers various aspects of technological innovation, exploring processes, products, and social impacts. It examines innovation in both process and product realms, including social innovations like regulatory frameworks and non-economic benefits. Topics range from emerging trends and capital for development to managing technology-intensive ventures and innovation in organizations of different sizes. It also discusses organizational structures, investment strategies for science and technology enterprises, and the roles of technological innovators. Additionally, it addresses technology transfer between developing countries and innovation across enterprise, political, and economic systems.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in trauma and emergency surgery: A quantitative study of perceived technology acceptance The role of AI for sustainability and economic performance: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry Data-driven high-tech entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence from China AI investment decision in digital home-based elderly care service: A mean field game analysis Knowledge spillovers from local innovative industrial clusters: A business group network perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1