Towards a Consensus Method for the Isolation of Microplastics from Freshwater Sediments

Daniel E. Enenche, Christine M. Davidson, John J. Liggat
{"title":"Towards a Consensus Method for the Isolation of Microplastics from Freshwater Sediments","authors":"Daniel E. Enenche, Christine M. Davidson, John J. Liggat","doi":"10.3390/environments11070146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental pollution caused by plastic waste is of global concern. There is growing interest in the study of microplastics in freshwater systems. However, the lack of harmonized analytical methodology makes it difficult to compare results obtained by different laboratories. This work compared methods for the recovery of microplastics from freshwater sediments based on density separation by flotation followed by digestion of organic matter. Simulated sediment was spiked with virgin polypropylene, polystyrene, polyamide (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) pellets, and post-consumer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fragments. Density separation was carried out using distilled water and NaCl, CaCl2, ZnCl2, and NaI solutions, both for intact pellets/fragments and following grinding and sieving to three size fractions (<1 mm, 1–2 mm, and >2 mm). Digestions with HNO3, NaOH, and Fenton’s reagent were compared. Only NaI quantitatively recovered all types of polymers. However, CaCl2 and ZnCl2 recovered all but PVF and PTFE. Different flotation patterns were observed for different size fractions of the same polymer, highlighting the fact that density is not the only factor affecting recovery. Digestion efficiencies were 6–78% in HNO3, 4–45% in NaOH, and 49–80% in Fenton’s reagent. Overall, CaCl2 is recommended for density separation and Fenton’s reagent for organic matter removal.","PeriodicalId":11886,"journal":{"name":"Environments","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental pollution caused by plastic waste is of global concern. There is growing interest in the study of microplastics in freshwater systems. However, the lack of harmonized analytical methodology makes it difficult to compare results obtained by different laboratories. This work compared methods for the recovery of microplastics from freshwater sediments based on density separation by flotation followed by digestion of organic matter. Simulated sediment was spiked with virgin polypropylene, polystyrene, polyamide (PA), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyvinyl fluoride (PVF) pellets, and post-consumer polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) fragments. Density separation was carried out using distilled water and NaCl, CaCl2, ZnCl2, and NaI solutions, both for intact pellets/fragments and following grinding and sieving to three size fractions (<1 mm, 1–2 mm, and >2 mm). Digestions with HNO3, NaOH, and Fenton’s reagent were compared. Only NaI quantitatively recovered all types of polymers. However, CaCl2 and ZnCl2 recovered all but PVF and PTFE. Different flotation patterns were observed for different size fractions of the same polymer, highlighting the fact that density is not the only factor affecting recovery. Digestion efficiencies were 6–78% in HNO3, 4–45% in NaOH, and 49–80% in Fenton’s reagent. Overall, CaCl2 is recommended for density separation and Fenton’s reagent for organic matter removal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从淡水沉积物中分离微塑料的共识方法
塑料废物造成的环境污染是全球关注的问题。人们对淡水系统中微塑料的研究兴趣与日俱增。然而,由于缺乏统一的分析方法,很难对不同实验室获得的结果进行比较。这项研究比较了基于浮选密度分离法和有机物消化法从淡水沉积物中回收微塑料的方法。模拟沉积物中添加了原生聚丙烯、聚苯乙烯、聚酰胺(PA)、聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET)和聚氟乙烯(PVF)颗粒以及消费后聚四氟乙烯(PTFE)碎片。使用蒸馏水和 NaCl、CaCl2、ZnCl2 和 NaI 溶液对完整的颗粒/碎片以及研磨和筛分成三种尺寸的碎片(2 毫米)进行密度分离。比较了用 HNO3、NaOH 和 Fenton 试剂进行的消解。只有 NaI 能定量回收所有类型的聚合物。然而,CaCl2 和 ZnCl2 除回收 PVF 和 PTFE 外,还回收了其他所有聚合物。同一聚合物的不同粒度馏分具有不同的浮选模式,这说明密度并不是影响回收率的唯一因素。在 HNO3 中的消化效率为 6-78%,在 NaOH 中的消化效率为 4-45%,在 Fenton 试剂中的消化效率为 49-80%。总之,建议用 CaCl2 进行密度分离,用 Fenton 试剂去除有机物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ultimate Fate of Reactive Dyes Absorbed onto Polymer Beads: Feasibility and Optimization of Sorbent Bio-Regeneration Under Alternated Anaerobic–Aerobic Phases Initial Insights into Teleworking’s Effect on Air Quality in Madrid City Zinc Accumulation Pattern in Native Cortaderia nitida in High Andes (Ecuador) and Potential for Zinc Phytoremediation in Soil Steam Stripping for Recovery of Ammonia from Wastewater Using a High-Gravity Rotating Packed Bed Life Cycle Assessment of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Remediation Technologies: A Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1