Recommendations to promote fairness and inclusion in biomedical AI research and clinical use

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104693
Ashley C. Griffin , Karen H. Wang , Tiffany I. Leung , Julio C. Facelli
{"title":"Recommendations to promote fairness and inclusion in biomedical AI research and clinical use","authors":"Ashley C. Griffin ,&nbsp;Karen H. Wang ,&nbsp;Tiffany I. Leung ,&nbsp;Julio C. Facelli","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Understanding and quantifying biases when designing and implementing actionable approaches to increase fairness and inclusion is critical for artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedical applications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this Special Communication, we discuss how bias is introduced at different stages of the development and use of AI applications in biomedical sciences and health care. We describe various AI applications and their implications for fairness and inclusion in sections on 1) Bias in Data Source Landscapes, 2) Algorithmic Fairness, 3) Uncertainty in AI Predictions, 4) Explainable AI for Fairness and Equity, and 5) Sociological/Ethnographic Issues in Data and Results Representation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We provide recommendations to address biases when developing and using AI in clinical applications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These recommendations can be applied to informatics research and practice to foster more equitable and inclusive health care systems and research discoveries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104693"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Understanding and quantifying biases when designing and implementing actionable approaches to increase fairness and inclusion is critical for artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedical applications.

Methods

In this Special Communication, we discuss how bias is introduced at different stages of the development and use of AI applications in biomedical sciences and health care. We describe various AI applications and their implications for fairness and inclusion in sections on 1) Bias in Data Source Landscapes, 2) Algorithmic Fairness, 3) Uncertainty in AI Predictions, 4) Explainable AI for Fairness and Equity, and 5) Sociological/Ethnographic Issues in Data and Results Representation.

Results

We provide recommendations to address biases when developing and using AI in clinical applications.

Conclusion

These recommendations can be applied to informatics research and practice to foster more equitable and inclusive health care systems and research discoveries.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物医学人工智能研究和临床应用中的公平性和包容性:技术和社会视角。
目标在设计和实施提高公平性和包容性的可行方法时,了解和量化偏见对于生物医学应用中的人工智能(AI)至关重要:在本特别通讯中,我们将讨论在生物医学和医疗保健领域开发和使用人工智能应用的不同阶段是如何引入偏见的。我们介绍了各种人工智能应用及其对公平性和包容性的影响,分别涉及:1)数据源景观中的偏见;2)算法公平性;3)人工智能预测中的不确定性;4)可解释人工智能的公平性和公正性;5)数据和结果表示中的社会学/人口学问题:结果:我们提供了在临床应用中开发和使用人工智能时解决偏见问题的建议:这些建议可应用于信息学研究和实践,以促进更公平、更包容的医疗保健系统和研究发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Early multi-cancer detection through deep learning: An anomaly detection approach using Variational Autoencoder. Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data. Cross-Modal self-supervised vision language pre-training with multiple objectives for medical visual question answering Machine learning approaches for the discovery of clinical pathways from patient data: A systematic review MultiADE: A Multi-domain benchmark for Adverse Drug Event extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1