Genetic Aesthetic: The Futures of Shaping Life to Our Tastes

Timothy E. Dolan
{"title":"Genetic Aesthetic: The Futures of Shaping Life to Our Tastes","authors":"Timothy E. Dolan","doi":"10.1177/19467567241261613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The domestication of plants and animals differs from symbiotic relationships in its literal redesign of one lifeform by another. The shaping of lifeforms with the domestication of both animals and plants from canines to corn via selective breeding, hybridization and now genetic engineering confirms how evolution is governed more by culture and less nature. The focus here is on the theme of design in which we are fully involved as witnessed in our developing numerous breeds for our ends ranging from food to flowers. We created unnatural colors, floppy ears, and no procreation without intervention each of which run counter to what was heretofore natural order. Each of these alterations and innumerably more are artificial and entirely unnatural from a standard Darwinian perspective with market forces now determining the directions that were the province of evolutionary forces. The patenting of life forms, genetic mapping and gene splicing have only accelerated what was already a process of artificial selection. The piece concludes with discussion on the biases that have implications for life on this planet from our meddling with myriad species everywhere. Our preferences for the warm and furry over the cold and slimy is addressed suggesting that futurists should take the lead along with environmental scientists and bioethicists in critically assessing these biases in the context of the enormous complexity which comprises the web of life.","PeriodicalId":92860,"journal":{"name":"World futures review","volume":"3 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World futures review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19467567241261613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The domestication of plants and animals differs from symbiotic relationships in its literal redesign of one lifeform by another. The shaping of lifeforms with the domestication of both animals and plants from canines to corn via selective breeding, hybridization and now genetic engineering confirms how evolution is governed more by culture and less nature. The focus here is on the theme of design in which we are fully involved as witnessed in our developing numerous breeds for our ends ranging from food to flowers. We created unnatural colors, floppy ears, and no procreation without intervention each of which run counter to what was heretofore natural order. Each of these alterations and innumerably more are artificial and entirely unnatural from a standard Darwinian perspective with market forces now determining the directions that were the province of evolutionary forces. The patenting of life forms, genetic mapping and gene splicing have only accelerated what was already a process of artificial selection. The piece concludes with discussion on the biases that have implications for life on this planet from our meddling with myriad species everywhere. Our preferences for the warm and furry over the cold and slimy is addressed suggesting that futurists should take the lead along with environmental scientists and bioethicists in critically assessing these biases in the context of the enormous complexity which comprises the web of life.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因美学按照我们的口味塑造生命的未来
动植物的驯化不同于共生关系,它是一种生命形式对另一种生命形式的重新设计。通过选择性育种、杂交以及现在的基因工程,从犬科动物到玉米,动物和植物的驯化对生命形式的塑造证实了进化如何更多地受到文化而不是自然的支配。这里的重点是 "设计 "这一主题,我们完全参与其中,这一点在我们为了从食物到花卉等各种目的而培育众多品种的过程中得到了证明。我们创造了不自然的颜色、松软的耳朵,以及没有干预就不能生育,这些都违背了之前的自然秩序。从标准的达尔文观点来看,这些改变都是人为的,完全不符合自然规律。生命形式的专利化、基因图谱和基因拼接只是加速了本已是人工选择的过程。文章最后讨论了我们对世界各地无数物种的干预对地球生命产生影响的偏见。文章讨论了我们对温暖、毛茸茸而非冰冷、黏糊糊的物种的偏好,认为未来学家应与环境科学家和生物伦理学家一起,在构成生命之网的巨大复杂性背景下,带头批判性地评估这些偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizing Foresight Tools Exploring Art:Futures Encounters Genetic Aesthetic: The Futures of Shaping Life to Our Tastes The Writing in the Sand. Introducing Sandtray Work in Futures Research Supervision Haiku Horizons: Visions of Tomorrow, Creative Mindsets, and Artificial Intelligence-Driven Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1