The Writing in the Sand. Introducing Sandtray Work in Futures Research Supervision

Marguerite Westacott, Trudi Flynn
{"title":"The Writing in the Sand. Introducing Sandtray Work in Futures Research Supervision","authors":"Marguerite Westacott, Trudi Flynn","doi":"10.1177/19467567241249714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an open inquiry that embraces curiosity and vulnerability in the anticipatory space of an art-led, Futures orientated PhD supervisory relationship. We use sandtray work to elicit an anticipatory aesthetic, recording emergent data and processes through the dialogical method of duoethnography, and the visual format of photography. We seek to generate an environment that rouses imagination, creativity and futures consciousness implicit in the Australian Research Council’s definition of research. We use a duoethnographic method to collaborate, reflect and provide dialogical ways to surface deep meanings. There is a shared equity of understanding of the research process as a vehicle for engaging with the unknown. Both supervisor and supervisee hold explicit and implicit referent knowledge in relation to person and process. Therefore, it is a collaborative, reciprocal and fluid environment, where 1 + 1 = ∞ possibilities. We use sandtray to provide the location of open inquiry, dialogical reciprocation, reflection, and improvisation. This gives voice to the meaning that is made in the meandering paths between the words and an opportunity to loosen the shackles of business as usual. The sandtray moves not-known material into conscious awareness via somatic/intuitive symbol selection, engagement with metaphor, and projection; each privileging the unconscious. Introducing sandtray process into the supervisory relationship provides an alternative and adjunct modality of non-verbal inquiry that can support the calling of an anticipatory aesthetic through the Futures Senses. While there is rich, though sparse, literature describing the facilitation of sandtray work within the context of clinical supervision of mental health professionals, the introduction of such an approach within research supervision appears rare, or unique in relation to published research.","PeriodicalId":92860,"journal":{"name":"World futures review","volume":"17 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World futures review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19467567241249714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents an open inquiry that embraces curiosity and vulnerability in the anticipatory space of an art-led, Futures orientated PhD supervisory relationship. We use sandtray work to elicit an anticipatory aesthetic, recording emergent data and processes through the dialogical method of duoethnography, and the visual format of photography. We seek to generate an environment that rouses imagination, creativity and futures consciousness implicit in the Australian Research Council’s definition of research. We use a duoethnographic method to collaborate, reflect and provide dialogical ways to surface deep meanings. There is a shared equity of understanding of the research process as a vehicle for engaging with the unknown. Both supervisor and supervisee hold explicit and implicit referent knowledge in relation to person and process. Therefore, it is a collaborative, reciprocal and fluid environment, where 1 + 1 = ∞ possibilities. We use sandtray to provide the location of open inquiry, dialogical reciprocation, reflection, and improvisation. This gives voice to the meaning that is made in the meandering paths between the words and an opportunity to loosen the shackles of business as usual. The sandtray moves not-known material into conscious awareness via somatic/intuitive symbol selection, engagement with metaphor, and projection; each privileging the unconscious. Introducing sandtray process into the supervisory relationship provides an alternative and adjunct modality of non-verbal inquiry that can support the calling of an anticipatory aesthetic through the Futures Senses. While there is rich, though sparse, literature describing the facilitation of sandtray work within the context of clinical supervision of mental health professionals, the introduction of such an approach within research supervision appears rare, or unique in relation to published research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙中书写》。在未来研究指导中引入沙画工作
本文介绍了在以艺术为主导、以未来为导向的博士生指导关系的预期空间中,拥抱好奇心和脆弱性的开放式探究。我们使用沙盘作品来激发一种预期美学,通过双人人种学的对话方法和摄影的视觉形式来记录新出现的数据和过程。我们力求创造一种环境,激发想象力、创造力和澳大利亚研究理事会对研究定义中隐含的未来意识。我们使用双人人种学方法进行合作、反思,并通过对话的方式揭示深层含义。我们对研究过程有一种共同的公平理解,认为它是接触未知世界的工具。指导者和被指导者都拥有与个人和过程相关的显性和隐性参考知识。因此,这是一个合作、互惠和多变的环境,其中 1 + 1 = ∞ 种可能性。我们利用沙盘为开放式探究、对话互惠、反思和即兴创作提供场所。这使得在字里行间蜿蜒曲折的路径中产生的意义得以表达,同时也为我们提供了一个机会,使我们能够松开一切照旧的桎梏。通过躯体/直觉符号选择、参与隐喻和投射,沙盘将不为人知的素材带入有意识的意识中;每种方式都赋予无意识以特权。在督导关系中引入沙盘过程,提供了一种非语言探究的替代和辅助方式,可以通过未来感官支持对预期美学的呼唤。虽然在心理健康专业人员的临床督导中,有大量文献(尽管数量很少)描述了沙盘推演工作的促进作用,但在研究督导中引入这种方法似乎很少见,或者说在已发表的研究中是独一无二的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Organizing Foresight Tools Exploring Art:Futures Encounters Genetic Aesthetic: The Futures of Shaping Life to Our Tastes The Writing in the Sand. Introducing Sandtray Work in Futures Research Supervision Haiku Horizons: Visions of Tomorrow, Creative Mindsets, and Artificial Intelligence-Driven Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1