Evaluation of patient perception and intraoperative bleeding in labial frenectomy: A comparision of diode laser and conventional scalpel techniques

Mutthineni Ramesh Babu, Arpita Paul, Amula Vinay Sagar, Mandem Harshini Sai
{"title":"Evaluation of patient perception and intraoperative bleeding in labial frenectomy: A comparision of diode laser and conventional scalpel techniques","authors":"Mutthineni Ramesh Babu, Arpita Paul, Amula Vinay Sagar, Mandem Harshini Sai","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": High frenal attachments are abnormalities corrected by surgical procedure called frenectomies. The scalpel technique is associated with pain, bleeding and postoperative discomfort. To overcome these shortcomings, in the recent times, diode lasers are gaining popularity due to less bleeding, pain during the procedure, healing outcome, and need for analgesics: To compare the bleeding during the procedure and postoperative pain in patients requiring labial frenectomy using conventional scalpel and diode laser techniques. Twenty patients with high labial frenum attachment requiring frenectomy were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into Group A: scalpel group and Group B: diode laser group. Pain assessment using VAS, severity of intraoperative bleeding and number of analgesics used were recorded: The analysis showed that VAS score for pain was significantly lower in the laser group as compared to the scalpel group Bleeding was mild in laser group, where as in scalpel group showed moderate or severe bleeding scores Post operative use of analgesics was more in scalpel group than laser group Laser was found to be an effective alternate to scalpel in performing frenectomy procedures, more importantly it showed less bleeding, less pain perception and more patient acceptance during the procedure.","PeriodicalId":495898,"journal":{"name":"IP international journal of periodontology and implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP international journal of periodontology and implantology","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2024.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: High frenal attachments are abnormalities corrected by surgical procedure called frenectomies. The scalpel technique is associated with pain, bleeding and postoperative discomfort. To overcome these shortcomings, in the recent times, diode lasers are gaining popularity due to less bleeding, pain during the procedure, healing outcome, and need for analgesics: To compare the bleeding during the procedure and postoperative pain in patients requiring labial frenectomy using conventional scalpel and diode laser techniques. Twenty patients with high labial frenum attachment requiring frenectomy were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into Group A: scalpel group and Group B: diode laser group. Pain assessment using VAS, severity of intraoperative bleeding and number of analgesics used were recorded: The analysis showed that VAS score for pain was significantly lower in the laser group as compared to the scalpel group Bleeding was mild in laser group, where as in scalpel group showed moderate or severe bleeding scores Post operative use of analgesics was more in scalpel group than laser group Laser was found to be an effective alternate to scalpel in performing frenectomy procedures, more importantly it showed less bleeding, less pain perception and more patient acceptance during the procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估唇缘切除术中患者的感觉和术中出血量:二极管激光与传统手术刀技术的比较
:肾前区高位附着是一种异常现象,可通过外科手术矫正,这种手术被称为肾前区切除术(frenectomies)。手术刀技术会带来疼痛、出血和术后不适。为了克服这些缺点,近来,二极管激光因出血少、术中疼痛轻、愈合效果好、无需镇痛药而越来越受欢迎:比较使用传统手术刀和二极管激光技术进行唇系带切除术的患者术中出血量和术后疼痛情况。本研究纳入了 20 名唇系膜高位附着、需要进行唇系膜切除术的患者。患者被随机分为 A 组:手术刀组和 B 组:二极管激光组。分析结果表明,与手术刀组相比,激光组患者的疼痛VAS评分明显较低。 激光组患者的出血量较轻,而手术刀组患者的出血量为中度或重度。术后,手术刀组患者的镇痛剂使用量高于激光组患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of patient perception and intraoperative bleeding in labial frenectomy: A comparision of diode laser and conventional scalpel techniques Treatment of periodontal osseous defect with bio-oss xenograft and biodegradable IGF fibers: A case report Biomarkers in periodontal health and diseases Management of Miller’s Class-III multiple recession defects in mandibular anterior teeth using vista technique and PRF membrane: A case report Challenges and solutions in plasma cell gingivitis: A clinical case analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1