Influence of Age, Sex and Anthropometry on Inspiratory Flow Rates of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A. Adetiloye, Alexander Akor, O. Awopeju, O. Adewole, Olurotimi Badero, Gregory Erhabor
{"title":"Influence of Age, Sex and Anthropometry on Inspiratory Flow Rates of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"A. Adetiloye, Alexander Akor, O. Awopeju, O. Adewole, Olurotimi Badero, Gregory Erhabor","doi":"10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i07/1921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects millions of people with increasing global prevalence, morbidity and mortality. Inhaled medications are central to the management of COPD. Therefore, understanding the minimum Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) requirements for inhaler devices is vital for optimal drug delivery. This study assessed PIF in patients with COPD compared with controls and, the influence of age, sex and anthropometric measurements on PIF. Methodology: A total of 150 subjects (75 patients with stable COPD, and 75 controls) participated in the study. Demographic and anthropometric data were collected from the study participants. Peak inspiratory flow was assessed using the In-check peak flow meter. Lung function was assessed by spirometry. In all the statistical tests, a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The control group had higher PIF than COPD group. All of the COPD patients had clinically effective PIF for Clickhaler, Diskus, Easibreathe, and pMDI. Majority of the COPD patients had clinically effective PIF for Turbohaler, and Autohaler. The mean PIF of male patients with COPD was significantly greater than that of females for Turbohaler. For the COPD group, there was a significant negative correlation between PIF and age for Diskus, Autohaler and Easibreathe. Significant positive correlation was also noted between PIF and weight for turbohaler, autohaler and easibreathe. Conclusion: Majority of COPD patients utilizing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are able to generate effective PIF. Increasing age, female gender, low body weight and low BMI may contribute to low PIF.","PeriodicalId":94374,"journal":{"name":"International journal of innovative research in medical science","volume":"34 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of innovative research in medical science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol09-i07/1921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) affects millions of people with increasing global prevalence, morbidity and mortality. Inhaled medications are central to the management of COPD. Therefore, understanding the minimum Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) requirements for inhaler devices is vital for optimal drug delivery. This study assessed PIF in patients with COPD compared with controls and, the influence of age, sex and anthropometric measurements on PIF. Methodology: A total of 150 subjects (75 patients with stable COPD, and 75 controls) participated in the study. Demographic and anthropometric data were collected from the study participants. Peak inspiratory flow was assessed using the In-check peak flow meter. Lung function was assessed by spirometry. In all the statistical tests, a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The control group had higher PIF than COPD group. All of the COPD patients had clinically effective PIF for Clickhaler, Diskus, Easibreathe, and pMDI. Majority of the COPD patients had clinically effective PIF for Turbohaler, and Autohaler. The mean PIF of male patients with COPD was significantly greater than that of females for Turbohaler. For the COPD group, there was a significant negative correlation between PIF and age for Diskus, Autohaler and Easibreathe. Significant positive correlation was also noted between PIF and weight for turbohaler, autohaler and easibreathe. Conclusion: Majority of COPD patients utilizing dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are able to generate effective PIF. Increasing age, female gender, low body weight and low BMI may contribute to low PIF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年龄、性别和人体测量对慢性阻塞性肺病患者吸气流速的影响
导言:慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)影响着数百万人,其全球发病率、发病率和死亡率不断上升。吸入药物是慢性阻塞性肺病治疗的核心。因此,了解吸入装置的最低峰值吸入流量(PIF)要求对于优化给药至关重要。本研究评估了慢性阻塞性肺病患者与对照组相比的峰值吸入流量,以及年龄、性别和人体测量对峰值吸入流量的影响。研究方法:共有 150 名受试者(75 名慢性阻塞性肺病稳定期患者和 75 名对照组)参加了研究。研究人员收集了受试者的人口统计学和人体测量数据。使用 In-check 峰值流量计评估吸气峰值流量。肺功能通过肺活量计进行评估。在所有统计检验中,P 值小于 0.05 即为显著。结果对照组的 PIF 值高于慢性阻塞性肺病组。所有慢性阻塞性肺病患者在使用 Clickhaler、Diskus、Easibreathe 和 pMDI 时,PIF 均达到临床有效。大多数慢性阻塞性肺病患者使用涡轮吸入器和自动吸入器的 PIF 临床有效。在使用涡轮吸入器时,男性慢性阻塞性肺病患者的平均 PIF 明显高于女性。在慢性阻塞性肺病组中,Diskus、Autohaler 和 Easibreathe 的 PIF 与年龄呈显著负相关。涡轮吸入器、自动吸入器和 Easibreathe 的 PIF 与体重也呈显著正相关。结论大多数使用干粉吸入器(DPI)的慢性阻塞性肺病患者能够产生有效的 PIF。年龄增长、女性性别、低体重和低体重指数可能会导致 PIF 值偏低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Age, Sex and Anthropometry on Inspiratory Flow Rates of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Kallmann Syndrome: A Late Diagnosis Epidemiological and Clinical Aspect of Scorpion Stings in the Region of Azilal Laryngeal Osteochondromatosis, A Rare and Potentially Fatal Diagnosis Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumour of Left Vagus: A Rare Presentation in Neurofibromatosis-1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1