An Evolving Landscape of the Psychology of Judgment and Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Administrative Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.3390/admsci14080162
Sakkaphat T. Ngamake, Jirapattara Raveepatarakul, Sukanlaya Sawang
{"title":"An Evolving Landscape of the Psychology of Judgment and Decision-Making: A Bibliometric Analysis","authors":"Sakkaphat T. Ngamake, Jirapattara Raveepatarakul, Sukanlaya Sawang","doi":"10.3390/admsci14080162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a discipline with an expansive and intricate landscape, the field of judgment and decision-making (JDM) has evolved significantly since the beginning of the 2020s. The extensive and intricate nature of this field might pose challenges for scholars and researchers in designing course content and curricula as well as in defining research boundaries. Several techniques from a bibliometric study, such as co-word analysis and co-citation analysis, can provide insights into the scopes and directions of the field. Previous bibliometric studies on the psychology of JDM have primarily analyzed published documents restricted either by content areas or by journal outlets. The present study attempts to analyze a collection of published documents with broad search terms (i.e., “judgment*” or “decision mak*”) within the purview of the psychology subject area, separately by years of publication (from 2020 to 2022) using the bibliometrix package in the R environment. The most relevant journals and the most frequent keywords have suggested established areas of study, uncovering common themes, patterns, and trends. Beyond that, two science mapping techniques (i.e., keyword co-occurrence network and reference co-citation network) revealed 12 prominent themes that cut across the three-year period. These themes, alongside other intellectually stimulating issues, were discussed based on a comparison with outstanding book chapters and reviews. Implications for pedagogical purposes were also provided with a handful of notable resources.","PeriodicalId":30376,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14080162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a discipline with an expansive and intricate landscape, the field of judgment and decision-making (JDM) has evolved significantly since the beginning of the 2020s. The extensive and intricate nature of this field might pose challenges for scholars and researchers in designing course content and curricula as well as in defining research boundaries. Several techniques from a bibliometric study, such as co-word analysis and co-citation analysis, can provide insights into the scopes and directions of the field. Previous bibliometric studies on the psychology of JDM have primarily analyzed published documents restricted either by content areas or by journal outlets. The present study attempts to analyze a collection of published documents with broad search terms (i.e., “judgment*” or “decision mak*”) within the purview of the psychology subject area, separately by years of publication (from 2020 to 2022) using the bibliometrix package in the R environment. The most relevant journals and the most frequent keywords have suggested established areas of study, uncovering common themes, patterns, and trends. Beyond that, two science mapping techniques (i.e., keyword co-occurrence network and reference co-citation network) revealed 12 prominent themes that cut across the three-year period. These themes, alongside other intellectually stimulating issues, were discussed based on a comparison with outstanding book chapters and reviews. Implications for pedagogical purposes were also provided with a handful of notable resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
判断与决策心理学不断发展的前景:文献计量分析
自 20 世纪 20 年代初以来,判断与决策(JDM)作为一门具有广阔而复杂前景的学科,已经取得了长足的发展。这一领域的广泛性和复杂性可能会给学者和研究人员设计课程内容和课程设置以及界定研究边界带来挑战。文献计量学研究中的一些技术,如合词分析和合引分析,可以帮助人们深入了解该领域的范围和方向。以往有关 JDM 心理学的文献计量学研究主要是分析受内容领域或期刊渠道限制的出版文献。本研究尝试使用 R 环境中的 bibliometrix 软件包,按出版年份(2020 年至 2022 年)分别分析心理学学科领域内使用宽泛搜索词(即 "判断*"或 "决策*")的已发表文献集。最相关的期刊和最常见的关键词表明了研究的既定领域,揭示了共同的主题、模式和趋势。此外,两种科学图谱技术(即关键词共现网络和参考文献共引网络)揭示了贯穿三年期的 12 个突出主题。在与优秀书籍章节和评论进行比较的基础上,对这些主题以及其他具有启发性的问题进行了讨论。此外,还提供了一些值得注意的教学资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Care: Management Implications, Ethical Challenges, and Policy Considerations Understanding and Mitigating Leadership Fear-Based Behaviors on Employee and Organizational Success The Effect of Payment Delay on Consumer Purchase Intention The Role of the Agglomeration Economy and Innovation Ecosystem in the Process of Competency Development and Growth of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Preferences of Generations of Customers in Slovakia in the Field of Marketing Communication and Their Impact on Consumer Behaviour
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1