Individual capacity growth over time in leadership courses: an intra-individual multilevel model approach

Robert C. Klein, D. Rosch
{"title":"Individual capacity growth over time in leadership courses: an intra-individual multilevel model approach","authors":"Robert C. Klein, D. Rosch","doi":"10.1108/jole-01-2024-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOur study was designed to investigate the longitudinal trajectories of student leader development capacities in a sample of students enrolled in multiple leadership-focused courses across several semesters. Our goal was to assess the degree to which course enrollment was associated with growth over the time that students engage as undergraduates in academic leadership programs, and if so, to assess the shape and speed of capacity change.Design/methodology/approachWe utilized a multilevel intra-individual modeling approach assessing students’ motivation to lead, leader self-efficacy, and leadership skills across multiple data collection points for students in a campus major or minor focused on leadership studies. We compared an unconditional model, a fixed effect model, a random intercept model, a random slope model, and a random slope and intercept model to determine the shape of score trajectories. Our approach was not to collect traditional pre-test and post-test data – choosing to collect data only at the beginning of each semester – to reduce time cues typically inherent within pre-test and post-test collections.FindingsOur results strongly suggested that individual students differ greatly in the degree to which they report the capacity to lead when initially enrolling in their first class. Surprisingly, the various models were unable to predict a pattern of longitudinal leader development through repeated course enrollment in our sample.Originality/valueOur investigation employed statistical methods that are not often utilized in leadership education quantitative research, and also included a data collection effort designed to avoid a linear pre-test/post-test score comparison.","PeriodicalId":517471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership Education","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jole-01-2024-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeOur study was designed to investigate the longitudinal trajectories of student leader development capacities in a sample of students enrolled in multiple leadership-focused courses across several semesters. Our goal was to assess the degree to which course enrollment was associated with growth over the time that students engage as undergraduates in academic leadership programs, and if so, to assess the shape and speed of capacity change.Design/methodology/approachWe utilized a multilevel intra-individual modeling approach assessing students’ motivation to lead, leader self-efficacy, and leadership skills across multiple data collection points for students in a campus major or minor focused on leadership studies. We compared an unconditional model, a fixed effect model, a random intercept model, a random slope model, and a random slope and intercept model to determine the shape of score trajectories. Our approach was not to collect traditional pre-test and post-test data – choosing to collect data only at the beginning of each semester – to reduce time cues typically inherent within pre-test and post-test collections.FindingsOur results strongly suggested that individual students differ greatly in the degree to which they report the capacity to lead when initially enrolling in their first class. Surprisingly, the various models were unable to predict a pattern of longitudinal leader development through repeated course enrollment in our sample.Originality/valueOur investigation employed statistical methods that are not often utilized in leadership education quantitative research, and also included a data collection effort designed to avoid a linear pre-test/post-test score comparison.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
领导力课程中个人能力随时间的增长:个人内部多层次模型方法
目的我们的研究旨在调查学生领导力发展能力的纵向轨迹,样本学生在几个学期中选修了多门以领导力为重点的课程。我们采用了一种多层次的个体内部建模方法,通过多个数据收集点来评估学生的领导动机、领导者自我效能感和领导技能。我们比较了无条件模型、固定效应模型、随机截距模型、随机斜率模型以及随机斜率和截距模型,以确定得分轨迹的形状。我们的方法是不收集传统的前测和后测数据,只在每个学期开始时收集数据,以减少前测和后测收集中通常固有的时间线索。令人惊讶的是,在我们的样本中,各种模型都无法通过重复选课来预测领导力的纵向发展模式。原创性/价值我们的调查采用了领导力教育定量研究中不常用的统计方法,还包括旨在避免前测/后测分数线性比较的数据收集工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring undergraduate students’ understanding of global leadership through short-term study abroad leadership courses Individual capacity growth over time in leadership courses: an intra-individual multilevel model approach “A part of who I Am:” a phenomenological study of emerging adult leader identity through family storytelling Unveiling the impact: A mixed-method inquiry into the impact of leadership development programs Leadership communication behaviors and attachment styles: theory for educating leaders to meet communication challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1