Spillover effects of online comments on high-involvement product sales: evidence from the Chinese automobile industry

Shutian Wang, Yan Lin, Lu Yan, Guoqing Zhu
{"title":"Spillover effects of online comments on high-involvement product sales: evidence from the Chinese automobile industry","authors":"Shutian Wang, Yan Lin, Lu Yan, Guoqing Zhu","doi":"10.1108/imds-01-2024-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeOnline comments significantly impact consumer choice and product sales. Existing research focuses on the direct effects of online comments on product sales, whereas studies on the spillover effects of online comments are relatively limited, especially for high-involvement products. This study explores the impact of online comments of competing products on focal product sales in high-involvement products.Design/methodology/approachData mining techniques are used to collect 72,367 online comments from the Autohome platform, and sentiment analysis algorithms are used to quantify the textual information for subsequent analysis. Specifically, two panel two-way fixed-effects models are constructed to explore the impact of the average valence and quantity of online comments of competing cars on focal car sales, and analyse this impact in terms of heterogeneity across car price levels, while the moderating effect of online comments of competing cars is explored.FindingsThe results show that the average quantity of online comments of competing cars has a significant effect on the sales of the focal car in the overall sample, while the average valence of online comments of competing cars does not have a significant spillover effect. Moreover, the spillover effect varies by car price level. For high-priced cars, the average quantity of online comments of competing cars significantly and negatively affects focal car sales, and the average valence of online comments of competing cars significantly and negatively moderates the effect of the valence of focal car online comments on its sales. For lower-priced cars, online comments of competing cars don’t significantly affect focal car sales.Originality/valueThis study not only enriches the theory of online comments and high-involvement product sales, but also provides reference and guidance for exploring spillover effects of online comments for other products.","PeriodicalId":508405,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","volume":"31 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Management & Data Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-01-2024-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeOnline comments significantly impact consumer choice and product sales. Existing research focuses on the direct effects of online comments on product sales, whereas studies on the spillover effects of online comments are relatively limited, especially for high-involvement products. This study explores the impact of online comments of competing products on focal product sales in high-involvement products.Design/methodology/approachData mining techniques are used to collect 72,367 online comments from the Autohome platform, and sentiment analysis algorithms are used to quantify the textual information for subsequent analysis. Specifically, two panel two-way fixed-effects models are constructed to explore the impact of the average valence and quantity of online comments of competing cars on focal car sales, and analyse this impact in terms of heterogeneity across car price levels, while the moderating effect of online comments of competing cars is explored.FindingsThe results show that the average quantity of online comments of competing cars has a significant effect on the sales of the focal car in the overall sample, while the average valence of online comments of competing cars does not have a significant spillover effect. Moreover, the spillover effect varies by car price level. For high-priced cars, the average quantity of online comments of competing cars significantly and negatively affects focal car sales, and the average valence of online comments of competing cars significantly and negatively moderates the effect of the valence of focal car online comments on its sales. For lower-priced cars, online comments of competing cars don’t significantly affect focal car sales.Originality/valueThis study not only enriches the theory of online comments and high-involvement product sales, but also provides reference and guidance for exploring spillover effects of online comments for other products.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络评论对高参与度产品销售的溢出效应:来自中国汽车行业的证据
目的 在线评论对消费者的选择和产品销售有重大影响。现有研究主要关注在线评论对产品销售的直接影响,而对在线评论溢出效应的研究相对有限,尤其是对高卷入度产品的研究。本研究探讨了竞品的在线评论对高卷入度产品中的焦点产品销售的影响。设计/方法/方法使用数据挖掘技术从汽车之家平台收集了 72367 条在线评论,并使用情感分析算法对文本信息进行量化,以便进行后续分析。具体而言,构建了两个面板双向固定效应模型,以探讨竞品汽车在线评论的平均价值和数量对焦点汽车销量的影响,并从不同汽车价格水平的异质性角度分析这种影响,同时探讨竞品汽车在线评论的调节效应。结果结果表明,在总体样本中,竞品汽车在线评论的平均数量对焦点汽车的销量有显著影响,而竞品汽车在线评论的平均价值没有显著的溢出效应。此外,溢出效应因汽车价格水平而异。对于高价位汽车,竞品汽车的平均在线评论量对焦点汽车的销量有显著的负面影响,而竞品汽车的平均在线评论价值对焦点汽车在线评论价值对其销量的影响有显著的负面调节作用。对于低价汽车,竞争汽车的在线评论对焦点汽车的销售没有显著影响。原创性/价值这项研究不仅丰富了在线评论与高卷入度产品销售的理论,而且为探索其他产品的在线评论溢出效应提供了参考和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interactive vs transactional: how social media ads engage consumers with disparate regulatory orientation and lay rationalism Strategy for sustainable supply chain transformation: a resource orchestration perspective Spillover effects of online comments on high-involvement product sales: evidence from the Chinese automobile industry The impact of digital transformation on firm performance Value co-creation on social attachment toward social platforms: evidence from developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1