Determination of borehole tiltmeter orientation using earth tides

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01878-7
Xiaojie Zhu, Jean Chéry, Michel Cattoen, Salvatore Gambino, Jiankun He, Michel Peyret, Laura Privitera, Han Cheng Seat
{"title":"Determination of borehole tiltmeter orientation using earth tides","authors":"Xiaojie Zhu, Jean Chéry, Michel Cattoen, Salvatore Gambino, Jiankun He, Michel Peyret, Laura Privitera, Han Cheng Seat","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01878-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate orientation of geodetic instruments is fundamental for understanding deformation processes within the Earth's interior. Misalignment can lead to significant errors in data interpretation, affecting various geophysical applications. However, accurate alignment of standalone instruments like seismometers, strainmeters and tiltmeters remains a challenge in field geodesy. While numerous seismic-wave-based orientation methods have been successfully applied to seismometers, they are often inapplicable to tiltmeters due to their high-frequency filtering behavior and the requirement for a neighboring, pre-oriented instrument. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel orientation calibration method for borehole tiltmeters based on maximizing the correlation between recorded tilt data and theoretical tides by adjusting azimuthal angles. Our study encompasses two kinds of borehole tiltmeters and four datasets from three different field sites. Using solid and ocean tides modeling together with local topography and cavity disturbances, we obtain coefficient correlations ranging between 0.831 and 0.963, and 95% confidence intervals of azimuthal angles below 3.3°. The correlation-based method demonstrates robustness across various tidal-signal extraction techniques, including different averaging window sizes and band-pass filters. Moreover, it yields azimuthal results in agreement with direct compass measurements for known orientations, while exhibiting a moderate sensitivity to factors such as ocean tides and site-specific topography for the studied cases. This method appears to be advantageous when direct measurements are either unavailable or challenging, and emerges as an accurate tool for determining borehole tiltmeter orientation. Its potential applicability may extend beyond tiltmeters to other instruments that can also record tidal phenomena, such as strainmeters and broadband seismometers. Additionally, its utility could be extended to environments like the seafloor, in order to refine the precision of azimuthal angle estimation and simplify methods for azimuthal angle determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01878-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate orientation of geodetic instruments is fundamental for understanding deformation processes within the Earth's interior. Misalignment can lead to significant errors in data interpretation, affecting various geophysical applications. However, accurate alignment of standalone instruments like seismometers, strainmeters and tiltmeters remains a challenge in field geodesy. While numerous seismic-wave-based orientation methods have been successfully applied to seismometers, they are often inapplicable to tiltmeters due to their high-frequency filtering behavior and the requirement for a neighboring, pre-oriented instrument. In response to these challenges, we propose a novel orientation calibration method for borehole tiltmeters based on maximizing the correlation between recorded tilt data and theoretical tides by adjusting azimuthal angles. Our study encompasses two kinds of borehole tiltmeters and four datasets from three different field sites. Using solid and ocean tides modeling together with local topography and cavity disturbances, we obtain coefficient correlations ranging between 0.831 and 0.963, and 95% confidence intervals of azimuthal angles below 3.3°. The correlation-based method demonstrates robustness across various tidal-signal extraction techniques, including different averaging window sizes and band-pass filters. Moreover, it yields azimuthal results in agreement with direct compass measurements for known orientations, while exhibiting a moderate sensitivity to factors such as ocean tides and site-specific topography for the studied cases. This method appears to be advantageous when direct measurements are either unavailable or challenging, and emerges as an accurate tool for determining borehole tiltmeter orientation. Its potential applicability may extend beyond tiltmeters to other instruments that can also record tidal phenomena, such as strainmeters and broadband seismometers. Additionally, its utility could be extended to environments like the seafloor, in order to refine the precision of azimuthal angle estimation and simplify methods for azimuthal angle determination.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用地球潮汐确定钻孔倾斜仪方位
大地测量仪器的精确定位是了解地球内部变形过程的基础。对准不准会导致数据解读出现重大误差,影响各种地球物理应用。然而,地震仪、应变仪和倾斜仪等独立仪器的精确对准仍然是野外大地测量中的一项挑战。虽然许多基于地震波的定向方法已成功应用于地震仪,但由于倾斜仪的高频滤波行为和对邻近预定向仪器的要求,这些方法往往不适用于倾斜仪。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一种新颖的井眼倾角仪方位校准方法,通过调整方位角,最大限度地提高记录的倾角数据与理论潮汐之间的相关性。我们的研究包括两种钻孔倾斜仪和来自三个不同野外地点的四个数据集。利用固体潮汐和海洋潮汐模型以及当地地形和空洞扰动,我们获得了介于 0.831 和 0.963 之间的系数相关性,方位角的 95% 置信区间低于 3.3°。基于相关性的方法在各种潮汐信号提取技术(包括不同的平均窗口大小和带通滤波器)中都表现出稳健性。此外,该方法得出的方位角结果与罗盘对已知方位的直接测量结果一致,同时对研究案例中的海洋潮汐和特定地点地形等因素表现出适度的敏感性。在无法进行直接测量或测量难度很大的情况下,这种方法似乎很有优势,是确定钻孔倾角仪方位的精确工具。它的潜在适用范围可能会从倾角仪扩展到其他也能记录潮汐现象的仪器,如应变仪和宽带地震仪。此外,其用途还可扩展到海底等环境,以提高方位角估算的精度,简化方位角确定方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1