R. Dill, L. Stumpe, J. Saynisch-Wagner, M. Thomas, H. Dobslaw
{"title":"Benefits of refined 10-day effective angular momentum forecasts for earth rotation parameter prediction","authors":"R. Dill, L. Stumpe, J. Saynisch-Wagner, M. Thomas, H. Dobslaw","doi":"10.1007/s00190-025-01941-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Effective angular momentum (EAM) forecasts are widely used as an important input for predicting both polar motion and dUT1. So far, model predictions for atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere utilized in Earth rotation research reach only 6-days into the future. GFZ’s oceanic and land-surface model forecasts are forced with operational 6-day high-resolution deterministic numerical weather predictions provided by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts. Those atmospheric forecasts extend also further into the future with a reduced sampling rate of just 6 h but the prediction skill decreases rapidly after roughly one week. To decide about publishing 10-day instead of 6-day model-based EAM forecasts, we generated a test set of 454 individual 10-day forecasts and used it with GFZ’s EAM Predictor method to calculate Earth rotation predictions. Using 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts leads to slight improvements in y-pole and dUT1 predictions for 10 to 30 days ahead. By introducing additional neural network models trained on the errors of the EAM forecasts when compared to their subsequently available analysis runs, Earth rotation prediction can be enhanced even further. A reduction of the mean absolute errors for polar motion and length-of-day prediction at a forecast horizon of 10 days of 26.8% in x-pole, 15.5% in y-pole, 27.6% in dUT1, and 47.1% in <span>\\(\\Delta \\)</span>LOD is achieved. This test application successfully demonstrates the potential of the extended EAM forecasts for Earth rotation prediction although the success rate has to be further improved to arrive at robust routine predictions. GFZ publishes from October 2024 onwards raw uncorrected 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts at www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/esmdata for the individual contributions of atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere. Users interested in the summarized effect of all subsystems are advised to use the 90-day combined EAM forecast product that also makes use of the presented corrections to the EAM forecasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01941-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective angular momentum (EAM) forecasts are widely used as an important input for predicting both polar motion and dUT1. So far, model predictions for atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere utilized in Earth rotation research reach only 6-days into the future. GFZ’s oceanic and land-surface model forecasts are forced with operational 6-day high-resolution deterministic numerical weather predictions provided by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts. Those atmospheric forecasts extend also further into the future with a reduced sampling rate of just 6 h but the prediction skill decreases rapidly after roughly one week. To decide about publishing 10-day instead of 6-day model-based EAM forecasts, we generated a test set of 454 individual 10-day forecasts and used it with GFZ’s EAM Predictor method to calculate Earth rotation predictions. Using 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts leads to slight improvements in y-pole and dUT1 predictions for 10 to 30 days ahead. By introducing additional neural network models trained on the errors of the EAM forecasts when compared to their subsequently available analysis runs, Earth rotation prediction can be enhanced even further. A reduction of the mean absolute errors for polar motion and length-of-day prediction at a forecast horizon of 10 days of 26.8% in x-pole, 15.5% in y-pole, 27.6% in dUT1, and 47.1% in \(\Delta \)LOD is achieved. This test application successfully demonstrates the potential of the extended EAM forecasts for Earth rotation prediction although the success rate has to be further improved to arrive at robust routine predictions. GFZ publishes from October 2024 onwards raw uncorrected 10-day instead of 6-day EAM forecasts at www.gfz-potsdam.de/en/esmdata for the individual contributions of atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial hydrosphere. Users interested in the summarized effect of all subsystems are advised to use the 90-day combined EAM forecast product that also makes use of the presented corrections to the EAM forecasts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as:
-Positioning
-Reference frame
-Geodetic networks
-Modeling and quality control
-Space geodesy
-Remote sensing
-Gravity fields
-Geodynamics