The Catheter Fell Out

Peyton Mashni BS , Clare Savage MD , Michael Jax BS , Anna Maria Reiter BS , Gordon Butler MD , Joseph B. Zwischenberger MD
{"title":"The Catheter Fell Out","authors":"Peyton Mashni BS ,&nbsp;Clare Savage MD ,&nbsp;Michael Jax BS ,&nbsp;Anna Maria Reiter BS ,&nbsp;Gordon Butler MD ,&nbsp;Joseph B. Zwischenberger MD","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Accidental catheter removal or drain dislodgment, including tube thoracostomy, is a common, high-risk complication in hospitalized and ambulatory patients that often necessitates an additional procedure, increased length of stay, and increased cost.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the tensile strength of pigtail catheter fixation using a simple interrupted suture, a U-stitch suture, or 2 simple interrupted skin sutures in a standardized skin model. Catheters were sutured to the skin, penetrating the collagen layer, with 1 of the 3 suture techniques and varying suture combinations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For each trial, breakage occurred at the suture or knot. The mean breakpoint varied significantly between 2 simple interrupted sutures and both the 1 simple interrupted suture and the U-stitch technique (analysis of variance post hoc test <em>P</em> &lt; .001), with the 2 simple interrupted suture technique withholding nearly 40% more force. Using the strongest suture, 0 silk, on a deceased adult sheep to secure a pigtail thoracostomy catheter yielded identical data compared with the standardized skin model.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In conclusion, 2 simple interrupted skin sutures to secure a pigtail catheter has very low risk with a strongly positive benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 281-285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124003218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Accidental catheter removal or drain dislodgment, including tube thoracostomy, is a common, high-risk complication in hospitalized and ambulatory patients that often necessitates an additional procedure, increased length of stay, and increased cost.

Methods

The aim of this study was to compare the tensile strength of pigtail catheter fixation using a simple interrupted suture, a U-stitch suture, or 2 simple interrupted skin sutures in a standardized skin model. Catheters were sutured to the skin, penetrating the collagen layer, with 1 of the 3 suture techniques and varying suture combinations.

Results

For each trial, breakage occurred at the suture or knot. The mean breakpoint varied significantly between 2 simple interrupted sutures and both the 1 simple interrupted suture and the U-stitch technique (analysis of variance post hoc test P < .001), with the 2 simple interrupted suture technique withholding nearly 40% more force. Using the strongest suture, 0 silk, on a deceased adult sheep to secure a pigtail thoracostomy catheter yielded identical data compared with the standardized skin model.

Conclusions

In conclusion, 2 simple interrupted skin sutures to secure a pigtail catheter has very low risk with a strongly positive benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导管脱落
背景:意外拔管或引流管脱位,包括开胸管,是住院和非住院患者常见的高风险并发症,通常需要额外的手术,增加住院时间,增加费用。方法本研究的目的是比较在标准化皮肤模型中,简单间断缝合、u型缝合和2种简单间断皮肤缝合的尾纤管固定的抗拉强度。将导管缝合到皮肤上,穿透胶原蛋白层,使用3种缝合技术中的1种和不同的缝合组合。结果每次试验均发生缝合线或结处断裂。2次简单间断缝合与1次简单间断缝合和u针技术的平均断点差异显著(方差分析事后检验P <;.001), 2简单间断缝合技术多保留近40%的力。与标准化皮肤模型相比,在一只死去的成年羊身上使用最强的缝线0丝来固定辫子式胸腔造口导管,得到了相同的数据。结论单纯2次皮肤中断缝合固定辫状导管风险极低,且获益显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Contents No-Touch Saphenous Vein Graft vs Radial Artery as an I-Composite Graft From the Right Internal Mammary Artery Zero-Heat Internal Thoracic Artery Harvesting Using Water Jet: An Experimental Study Do Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery Differ by Preoperative Status and Socioeconomic Deprivation? Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in a Patient With an Occluded Abdominal Aorta Supported by Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1