Sebastian Kraul , Melanie Erhard , Jens O. Brunner
{"title":"Optimizing physician schedules with resilient break assignments","authors":"Sebastian Kraul , Melanie Erhard , Jens O. Brunner","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a novel model for building biweekly rosters for physicians according to the regulations of a German teaching hospital, while also ensuring the viability of breaks. Currently, rosters are manually prepared by experienced physicians with basic spreadsheet knowledge, leading to significant costs and time consumption because of the complexity of the problem and the individual working conditions of the physicians. Unfortunately, manually generated rosters frequently prove to be non-compliant with labor regulations and ergonomic agreements, resulting in potential overtime hours and employee dissatisfaction. A particular concern is the inability of physicians to take mandatory breaks, which negatively affects both employee motivation and the hospital service level. To address these challenges, we propose a data-driven formulation of an operational physician scheduling problem, considering overstaffing and overtime hours as primary cost drivers and integrating shift preferences and break viability as ergonomic objectives. We develop and train a survival regression model to predict the viability of breaks, allowing practitioners to define break-time windows appropriately. Given the limitations of standard solvers in producing high-quality solutions within a reasonable timeframe, we adopt a Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition to reformulate the proposed model. Furthermore, we develop a branch-and-price algorithm to achieve optimal solutions and introduce a problem-specific variable selection strategy for efficient branching. To assess the algorithm’s effectiveness and examine the impact of the new break assignment constraint, we conducted a comprehensive computational study using real-world data from a German training hospital. Using our approach, healthcare institutions can streamline the rostering process, minimize the costs associated with overstaffing and overtime hours, and improve employee satisfaction by ensuring that physicians can take their legally mandated breaks. Ultimately, this contributes to better employee motivation and improves the overall level of hospital service.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103154"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001191/pdfft?md5=387db483beaf7d6446b96405cc3905cf&pid=1-s2.0-S0305048324001191-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article presents a novel model for building biweekly rosters for physicians according to the regulations of a German teaching hospital, while also ensuring the viability of breaks. Currently, rosters are manually prepared by experienced physicians with basic spreadsheet knowledge, leading to significant costs and time consumption because of the complexity of the problem and the individual working conditions of the physicians. Unfortunately, manually generated rosters frequently prove to be non-compliant with labor regulations and ergonomic agreements, resulting in potential overtime hours and employee dissatisfaction. A particular concern is the inability of physicians to take mandatory breaks, which negatively affects both employee motivation and the hospital service level. To address these challenges, we propose a data-driven formulation of an operational physician scheduling problem, considering overstaffing and overtime hours as primary cost drivers and integrating shift preferences and break viability as ergonomic objectives. We develop and train a survival regression model to predict the viability of breaks, allowing practitioners to define break-time windows appropriately. Given the limitations of standard solvers in producing high-quality solutions within a reasonable timeframe, we adopt a Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition to reformulate the proposed model. Furthermore, we develop a branch-and-price algorithm to achieve optimal solutions and introduce a problem-specific variable selection strategy for efficient branching. To assess the algorithm’s effectiveness and examine the impact of the new break assignment constraint, we conducted a comprehensive computational study using real-world data from a German training hospital. Using our approach, healthcare institutions can streamline the rostering process, minimize the costs associated with overstaffing and overtime hours, and improve employee satisfaction by ensuring that physicians can take their legally mandated breaks. Ultimately, this contributes to better employee motivation and improves the overall level of hospital service.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.