Affective valence predictors from real-world based short sprint interval training

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2024.07.003
Stefano Benítez-Flores , Flávio A. de S. Castro , Eduardo Caldas Costa , Daniel Boullosa , Todd A. Astorino
{"title":"Affective valence predictors from real-world based short sprint interval training","authors":"Stefano Benítez-Flores ,&nbsp;Flávio A. de S. Castro ,&nbsp;Eduardo Caldas Costa ,&nbsp;Daniel Boullosa ,&nbsp;Todd A. Astorino","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Affective valence is typically positive at exercise intensities below the lactate threshold, yet more aversive responses occur at supra-threshold intensities. Nevertheless, the physiological and psychological predictors of affective valence during supramaximal intensities including short sprint interval training (sSIT) have not yet been elucidated. Seventeen (7 women/10 men) moderately active young adults (age ​= ​[28.2 ​± ​5.6] years; <span><math><mrow><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover></mrow></math></span>O<sub>2max</sub> [maximum oxygen consumption] ​= ​[52.9 ​± ​8.1] mL·kg<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>·min<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>; BMI [body mass index] ​= ​[24 ​± ​2] kg·m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>) completed four low-volume running sSIT sessions (10 ​× ​4 ​s efforts with 30 ​s of passive recovery). We recorded participants’ heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences of normal RR intervals (RMSSD), heart rate recovery (HRR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), feeling scale (FS), intention and self-efficacy during, and after each session. Overall, no significant correlation (<em>p</em> ​&gt; ​0.05) was found between FS and baseline clinical outcomes. No significant correlation (<em>p</em> ​&gt; ​0.05) was detected between FS and any training parameter. No significant correlations were noted between FS and exercise task self-efficacy and intentions (<em>p</em> ​&gt; ​0.05). The regression model was significant (<em>F</em><sub><em>3,61</em></sub> ​= ​5.57; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.002) and only three variables significantly entered the generated model: ΔHRR<sub>end-120s end</sub> (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.002; <em>VIF</em> ​= ​2.58; 40.8%), time ≥ 90% HR<sub>peak</sub> (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.001; <em>VIF</em> ​= ​1.26; 31.6%), and RMSSD<sub>end</sub> (<em>p</em> ​= ​0.025; <em>VIF</em> ​= ​2.23; 27.6%). These findings suggest that HR-based measures, particularly those related to in-task stress (time ≥ 90% HR<sub>peak</sub>) and acute recovery (ΔHRR<sub>end-120s end</sub>, and RMSSD<sub>end</sub>), may predict affective valence during real-world sSIT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"7 3","pages":"Pages 190-201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Affective valence is typically positive at exercise intensities below the lactate threshold, yet more aversive responses occur at supra-threshold intensities. Nevertheless, the physiological and psychological predictors of affective valence during supramaximal intensities including short sprint interval training (sSIT) have not yet been elucidated. Seventeen (7 women/10 men) moderately active young adults (age ​= ​[28.2 ​± ​5.6] years; V˙O2max [maximum oxygen consumption] ​= ​[52.9 ​± ​8.1] mL·kg1·min1; BMI [body mass index] ​= ​[24 ​± ​2] kg·m2) completed four low-volume running sSIT sessions (10 ​× ​4 ​s efforts with 30 ​s of passive recovery). We recorded participants’ heart rate (HR), root mean square of successive differences of normal RR intervals (RMSSD), heart rate recovery (HRR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), feeling scale (FS), intention and self-efficacy during, and after each session. Overall, no significant correlation (p ​> ​0.05) was found between FS and baseline clinical outcomes. No significant correlation (p ​> ​0.05) was detected between FS and any training parameter. No significant correlations were noted between FS and exercise task self-efficacy and intentions (p ​> ​0.05). The regression model was significant (F3,61 ​= ​5.57; p ​= ​0.002) and only three variables significantly entered the generated model: ΔHRRend-120s end (p ​= ​0.002; VIF ​= ​2.58; 40.8%), time ≥ 90% HRpeak (p ​= ​0.001; VIF ​= ​1.26; 31.6%), and RMSSDend (p ​= ​0.025; VIF ​= ​2.23; 27.6%). These findings suggest that HR-based measures, particularly those related to in-task stress (time ≥ 90% HRpeak) and acute recovery (ΔHRRend-120s end, and RMSSDend), may predict affective valence during real-world sSIT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从基于真实世界的短跑间歇训练中预测情感价位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of high-intensity intermittent cross-training on maximal oxygen uptake Physical activity, exercise, and mental health of healthy adolescents: A review of the last 5 ​years Mechanisms of muscle repair after peripheral nerve injury by electrical stimulation combined with blood flow restriction training An integrative review of the effects of high-intensity interval training on the autonomic nervous system Affective valence predictors from real-world based short sprint interval training
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1